Skip to main content
Log in

Stridulation and hearing in the noctuid mothThecophora fovea (Tr.)

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

MaleThecophora fovea (Tr.) (Noctuidae) ‘sing’ continuously for several minutes by rubbing the 1. tarsal segment of the metathoracic leg against a stridulatory swelling on the hindwing. In Northern Yugoslavia (Slovenia) the males emerge in late October and start stridulating about a week later when the females emerge.

The sounds are pulse trains consisting of 10–12 ms long sound pulses with main energy around 32 kHz and a PRR of 20 pulses/s. The mechanics of the sound producing apparatus was studied by activating the stridulatory swelling with short sound impulses. The impulse response of the swelling was recorded by laser vibrometry and amplitude spectra of the vibrations showed maximum velocities between 25 and 35 kHz. Hence, it seems likely that the stridulatory swelling is driven as a mechanical oscillator with a resonance frequency which determines the carrier frequency of the sounds.

Audiograms of both males and females showed peak sensitivities at 25–30 kHz. The median threshold at the BF was 36 dB SPL. The peak intensity of the sound pulses was 83 dB SPL at 1 m, which should enable the moths to hear each other at distances of around 30 m. Therefore sound production inT. fovea might function in long distance calling. It is argued thatT. fovea can survive making such a noise in spite of being palatable to bats because it flies so late in the year that it is temporally isolated from bats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PRR :

pulse repetition rate

SPL :

sound pressure level

BF :

best frequency

References

  • Andersen BB, Miller LA (1977) A portable ultrasonic detection system for recording bat cries in the field. J Mammal 58:226–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchler ER, Childs SB (1982) Orientation to distant sounds by foraging big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Anim Behav 29:428–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumortier B (1963) Morphology of sound emission apparatus in Arthropoda. In: Busnel RG (ed) Acoustic behaviour of animals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 277–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott DJH, Koch UT (1985) The clockwork cricket. Naturwissenschaften 72:150–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton MB, Fullard JH (1981) Moth hearing and the feeding strategies of bats. Am Sci 69:266–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullard JH (1979) Behavioral analyses of auditory sensitivity inCycnia tenera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). J Comp Physiol 129:79–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne D, Edwards ED (1986) Ultrasound production by genital stridulation inSyntonarcha iriastis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): Long distance signalling by male moths? Zool J Linn Soc (in press)

  • Hannemann HJ (1956) Über ptero-tarsale Stridulation und einige andere Arten der Lauterzeugung bei Lepidopteren. Dtsch Entomol Z 3:14–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan KHC (1921) On the replacement of a lost vein in connection with a stridulating organ in a new agaristid moth from Madagascar, with descriptions of two new genera. Nov Zool 28:68–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Markl H (1983) Vibrational communication. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 332–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen A, Larsen ON (1978) Biophysics of the ensiferan ear. I. Tympanal vibrations in bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae) studied with laser vibrometry. J Comp Physiol 123:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocke H (1971) Biophysik der Schallerzeugung durch die Vorderflügel der Grillen. Z Vergl Physiol 74:272–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquinelly F, Busnel M-C (1955) Études préliminaires sur les mécanismes de la production des sons par les Orthoptères. L'Acoustique des Orthoptères INRA, Paris, pp 145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter K (1912) Versuche über das Hörvermögen eines Schmetterlings (Endrosa v. ramosa). Biol Zentralbl 32:724–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeder KD (1966) Acoustic sensitivity of the noctuid tympanic organ and its range for the cries of bats. J Insect Physiol 12:843–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangler HG, Greenfield MD, Takessian A (1984) Ultrasonic mate calling in the lesser wax moth. Physiol Entomol 9:87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Surlykke A (1984) Hearing in notodontid moths. A hearing organ with only a single auditory neurone. J Exp Biol 113:323–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Surlykke A (1986) Moth hearing on the Faroe Islands; An area without bats. Physiol Entomol 11:221–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Surlykke A, Miller LA (1985) The influence of arctiid moth clicks on bat echolocation; Jamming or warning? J Comp Physiol A 156:831–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigglesworth VB (1965) The principles of insect physiology. 6th edition. Methuen & Co, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Surlykke, A., Gogala, M. Stridulation and hearing in the noctuid mothThecophora fovea (Tr.). J. Comp. Physiol. 159, 267–273 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612309

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612309

Keywords

Navigation