Skip to main content
Log in

Echolocation in the noctule (Nyctalus noctula) and horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum)

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    When catching flying prey under laboratory conditionsRhinolophus ferrumequinum typically emit FM-CF-FM signals (Fig. 2). Except for the last two sounds during approach and final buzz the FM-parts are fainter than the CF-component by a factor of 0.76+-14 (Fig. 1). The final FM-part was undetectable in some signals emitted during approach (Fig. 3).

  2. 2.

    In obstacle avoidance flights both, preceding and final FM-parts are prominent and louder than the CF-part by a factor of 1.14 to 1.63 (Fig. 1 and 3). Bandwidths of the FM-components increased from ca. 3.5 to 12 kHz for the starting and from 12 to 20 kHz on the average for the final FM-sweep (Table 1).

  3. 3.

    In the open field during cruising flightsNyctalus noctula emits pure tones of 22.5 to 25.0 kHz without any frequency modulated components and a duration of 10 to 50 ms (Fig. 4). Brief frequency modulated signals sweeping from ca. 50 to 20 kHz in about 1–2 ms are emitted during pursuit of prey (Fig. 4).

  4. 4.

    Under laboratory conditionsNyctalus noctula does not emit pure tones and is not able to catch flying prey in a flight chamber 10.5×3.5×2.15 m in size. During flights towards a landing platformNyctalus noctula invariably emits brief frequency modulated pulses. During an individual flight the structure is not changed (Fig. 5).

  5. 5.

    InNyctalus noctula specific features of the echolocation pulses, e.g. frequency range swept through, presence of harmonics and double pulses (Fig. 6) are maintained during an individual flight. These specific characteristics of the signal may be used to identify echoes belonging to its own emitted echolocation pulse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CF :

constant frequency

FM :

frequency modulated

SPL :

sound pressure level

References

  • Ahlen I (1981) Identification of Scandinavian bats by their sounds. Swed Univ Agricult Sci Dept Wildlife Ecol Report 6, Uppsala

  • Griffin DR, Webster FA, Michael CR (1960) The echolocation of flying insects by bats. J Anim Behav 8:141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Habersetzer J (1981) Adaptive echolocation sounds in the batRhinopoma hardwickei. J Comp Physiol 144:559–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Habersetzer J, Vogler B (1983) Discrimination of surface structured targets by the echolocating batMyotis myotis during flight. J Comp Physiol 152:275–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnischfeger G (1980) Brainstem units of echolocating bats code binaural time differences in the microsecond range. Naturwissenschaften 67:314–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller LA, Degn HJ (1981) The acoustic behaviour of four species of vespertilionid bats studied in the field. J Comp Physiol 142:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G, Bruns V, Schuller G (1980) Ears adapted for the detection of motion, or how echolocating bats have exploited the capacities of the mammalian auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 68:741–753

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill WE, Suga N (1982) Encoding of target range and its representation in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat. J Neurosci 2:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye JD (1972) Bimodal distribution of constant frequencies in some hipposiderid bats. J Zool 166:323–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye JD (1978) Some preliminary observations on flexible echolocation systems. In: Olembo RJ, Castelino JB, Mutere FA (eds) Proc Fourth Int Bat Res Conf, Lit. Bureau Nairobi, Kenya, pp 127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler HU (1968) Die Ultraschallortungslaute der Hufeisenfledermäuse in verschiedenen Ortungssituationen. Z Vergl Physiol 57:376–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler HU, Henson OW (1980) Performance of airborne animal sonar systems: I. Echolocation of microchiropteran bats. In: Busnel RG, Fish J (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York, pp 109–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1973) The resolution of target range by echolocating bats. J Acoust Soc Am 54:157–173

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vogler, B., Neuweiler, G. Echolocation in the noctule (Nyctalus noctula) and horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum). J. Comp. Physiol. 152, 421–432 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606247

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606247

Keywords

Navigation