Abstract
In 1590, or thereabouts, Galileo wrote the manuscript De Motu (Galileo 1590). In this text he attempted to demonstrate the errors of Aristotelian natural philosophy and began his lifelong attempt to construct a science of motion. The chief device in De Motu was his wide ranging use of the balance. The balance was a simple machine, familiar to all, that Galileo could describe using principles of equilibrium.
In this paper we suggest an empirical thesis: Galileo understood something important when he used the balance as the basic equilibrium model in order to understand all the phenomena of motion. Galileo used the balance model to make intelligible problems of dynamics as well as kinematics (as we anachronistically call them).
We believe that using the Galilean balance equilibrium model today in physics classes at the secondary and college levels (and probably even at the elementary school level) would provide students with a model of intelligibility that would unify their thinking about motion and, at the same time, provide them with a general procedural schema for solving motion problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beiser, A.: 1986, Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Galileo: 1586 (1961), La Balancitta (The balance) included in L. Fermi and Gilberto Bernardini, Galileo and the Scientific Revolution, Fawcet, Greenwich, Connecticut.
Galileo: 1590 (1960), De Motu (On Motion), Translated S. Drake, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Galileo: 1600 (1960), On Mechanics (Le Meccaniche), Translated L. Drabkin, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Galileo: 1632 (1967), Dialogues Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, Translated S. Drake, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Galileo: 1640 (1974), Discourses on the Two New Sciences, Translated S. Drake, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Giancoli, D.: 1984, General Physics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Giancoli, D.: 1985, Physics: Principles with Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Halliday, D. & Resnick, R.: 1981, The Fundamentals of Physics (Extended Version), John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Hewitt, P.: 1989, Conceptual Physics, Scott, Foresman, and Company, Glenview, IL.
Holton, G: 1972, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Huyghens 1660 (1977), Christian Huygens’ The Motion of Colliding Bodies, translated Richard J. Blackwell, Isis 68, 574–597.
Johnson-Laird, P.: 1983, Mental Models, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Kuhn, T.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Edition, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Lakoff, G: 1987, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E. & Pribram, K.: 1960, Plans and the Structure of Behavior, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Neisser, U: 1976, Cognition and Reality, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
Pepper, S.: 1948, World Hypotheses, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B.: 1966 (1969), The Psychology of the Child, Translated H. Weaver, Basic Books, New York.
Rosch, E.: 1975, ‘Cognitive Reference Points’, Cognitive Psychology 7, 532–47.
Rutherford, F. J., Holton, G. & Watson, F.: 1981, Project Physics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sears, F., Zemansky, M. & Young, H.: 1986, College Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Toulmin, S: 1961, Foresight and Understanding, Harper, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Machamer, P., Woody, A. A model of intelligibility in science: Using Galileo's balance as a model for understanding the motion of bodies. Sci Educ 3, 215–244 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540155
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540155