Abstract
This paper reports preclinical data that may predict the amount of state-dependent learning likely to be produced in humans by various psychoactive drugs. In a T-maze, rats were required to turn right when drugged and left when not drugged to escape from electric shock. The number of training sessions required to learn this drug versus no drug discrimination was used as an indicator of the degree of discriminability of the training drug. Using this procedure, the discriminability of more than 100 common psychoactive drugs was determined at one or more doses. Sessions to criterion usually decreased as dosage was increased. Maximum discriminability occurred at the highest usable dose in most cases, and differed considerably for drugs of various types. The results suggest that the majority of psychoactive drugs can be investigated by use of the drug discrimination technique, and that state-dependent learning effects will not accompany clinical use of most psychoactive drugs unless intoxicating doses are used.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger B, Stein L (1969) Asymmetrical dissociation of learning between scopolamine and Wy4036, a new benzodiazepine tranquilizer. Psychopharmacologia 14:351–358
Edwards AL (1967) Statistical methods. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
Girden E, Culler EA (1937) Conditioned responses in curarized striate muscle in dogs. J Comp Psychol 23:261–274
Harris RT, Balster RL (1971) An analysis of the function of drugs in the stimulus control of operant behavior. In: Thompson T, Pickens R (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, pp 111–132
Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. Wiley and Sons, New York
Hill HE, Jones BE, Bell EC (1971) State-dependent control of discrimination by morphine and pentobarbital. Psychopharmacologia 22:305–313
Jarbe TUC (1976) Methaqualone discrimination in gerbils: Interactions with bemegride and imidazoline (DH-524). Med Biol 54:364–368
Jarbe TUC,(1977) Alcohol-discrimination in gerbils: Interactions with bemegride, DH-524, amphetamine, and delta-9-THC. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 227:118–129
Jarbe TUC, Johansson JO (1976) Drug discrimination in rats: Effects of mixtures of Ditran and cholinesterase inhibitors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 4:151–157
Jarbe TUC, Johansson JO, Henriksson BG (1976) Characteristics of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-produced discrimination in rats. Psychopharmacology 48:181–187
Johansson JO, Jarbe TUC (1975) Diazepam as a discriminative cue: Its antagonism by bemegride. Eur J Pharmacol 30:372–375
Johansson JO, Jarbe TUC (1976) Physostigmine as a discriminative cue in rats. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 219:97–102
Krimmer EC (1974) Drugs as discriminative stimuli. Ph. D. Thesis, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh
McKim WA (1976) The effects of pre-exposure to scopolamine on subsequent drug state discrimination. Psychopharmacology 47:153–155
Overton DA (1964) State-dependent or “dissociated” learning produced with pentobarbital. J Comp Physiol Psychol 57:3–12
Overton DA (1966) State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psychopharmacologia 10:6–31
Overton DA (1969) Control of T-maze choice by nicotinic, antinicotinic and antimuscarinic drugs. Proc Am Psychol Assoc 4:869–870
Overton DA (1971) Discriminative control of behavior by drug states. In: Thompson T, Pickens R (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, pp 87–110
Overton DA (1973) State-dependent learning produced by addicting drugs. In: Fisher S, Freedman AM (eds) Opiate addiction: Origins and treatment. Winston and Sons, Washington DC, pp 61–75
Overton DA (1974) Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning. Fed Proc 33:1800–1813
Overton DA (1975) A comparison of the discriminable CNS effects of ketamine, phencyclidine and pentobarbital. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 215:180–189
Overton DA (1976) Discriminable effects of benzodiazepines. Psychopharmacol Commun 2:339–343
Overton DA (1977a) Comparison of ethanol, pentobarbital and phenobarbital using drug vs drug discrimination training. Psychopharmacology 53:195–199
Overton DA (1978b) Discriminable effects of antimuscarinics: Dose response and substitution test studies. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:659–666
Overton DA (1978a) Major theories of state dependent learning. In: Ho BT, Richards III DW, Chute DL (eds) Drug discrimination and state-dependent learning. Academic, New York, pp 283–318
Overton DA (1978b) Discriminable effects of antihistamine drugs. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 232:221–226
Overton DA (1978c) Status of research on state-dependent learning: In: Colpaert FC, Rosecrans JA (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs: Ten years of progress. Elservier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 559–562
Overton DA (1979) Influence of shaping procedures and schedules of reinforcement on performance in the two-bar drug discrimination task: A methodological report. Psychopharmacology 65:291–298
Overton DA, Batta SK (1977) Relationship between abuse liability of drugs and their degree of discriminability in the rat. In: Thompson T, Unna KR (eds) Predicting dependence liability of stimulant and depressant drugs. University Park, Baltimore, pp 125–135
Overton DA, Batta SK (1979) Investigation of narcotics and antitussives using drug discrimination techniques. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 211:401–408
Pusakulich RL, Nielson HC (1976) Cue use in state-dependent learning. Physiol Psychol 4:421–428
Sachs E (1967) Dissociation of learning in rats and its similarities to dissociative states in man. In: Zubin J, Hunt H (eds) Comparative psychopathology. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 249–304
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Overton, D.A. Comparison of the degree of discriminability of various drugs using the T-maze drug discrimination paradigm. Psychopharmacology 76, 385–395 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449130
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449130