Skip to main content
Log in

On the active principles of the spurge family (Euphorbiaceae)

IV. Skin irritant and tumor promoting diterpene esters from Euphorbia ingens E. Mey

  • Original Papers
  • Experimental Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The irritant and tumor-promoting principles of the latex of Euphorbia ingens E. Mey have been isolated together with several nonirritant compounds. The Euphorbia factors I1, I5, and I6 are esters of ingenane-type polyfunctional diterpene alcohols.

Euphorbia factor I1 is characterized as the 3-hexadecanoate of the polyfunctional parent alcohol ingenol and Euphorbia factor I6 as the 3-deca-2.4.6-trienoic acid ester of ingenol. Euphorbia factor I5 is the 16-angelate-3-deca-2.4.6-trienoate of 16-hydroxyingenol.

Nonirritant diterpenes of the latex are I2, the ingenol-20-hexadecanoate — an isomer of Euphorbia factor I1-and I4, the 3.7.12-triacetate-8-nicotinate of the macrocyclic lathyrane-type polyfunctional diterpene alcohol ingol.

The diterpene alcohols ingenol and 16-hydroxyingenol are inactive as irritants and tumor promoters of mouse skin. Compared to croton oil factor A1 (TPA), the Euphorbia factor I1 exhibits about 1/10 of the irritant and tumor-promoting activity in mouse skin. I1 shows no reasonable tumorigenic activity. Compared with I1, Euphorbia factors I5 and I6 are more potent irritants and less potent tumor promoters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolf W (1970) Diterpene aus Samen und Latex der Springwolfsmilch (Euphorbia lathyris L). Dissertation Universität Heidelberg

  • Adolf W, Hecker E (1975) On the active Principles of the spurge familiy. III. Skin irritant and cocarcinogenic factors from the Caper spurge. Z Krebsforsch 84:325–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adolf W, Hecker E (1977) Diterpenoid irritants and cocarcinogens in Euphorbiaceae and Thymelaeaceae: Structural relationship in view of their biogenesis. Isr J Chem 16:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Adolf W, Opferkuch HJ, Hecker E (1968) Diterpene aus dem Samenöl von Euphorbia lathyris und ihre tumorpromovierende Wirkung. Fette, Seifen, Anstrichmittel. Ernährungsindustrie 70:825

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour JB, Warren FL, Wood DA (1951) The Euphorbia resins. Part VII. The characterization of the groups in Euphorbol. J Chem Soc: 2537–2539

  • Buchanan RA, Otey FH, Russell CR, Cull IM (1978) JAOCS 55:657–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin M (1976) Hydrocarbons via Photosynthesis. ACS Rubber Div Mtg San Francisco, Cal, October 4–6. Report prepared under contract W-7405-ENG-48 for the US Energy Research and Development Administration

  • Calvin M (1977) Hydrocarbons via photosynthesis. Int J Energy Res 1:299–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin M (1978) Chemistry, population, resources. Pure Appl Chem 50:407–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin M (1980) Hydrocarbons from plants. Naturwissenschaften 67:523–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenberger G, Hecker E (1972) Zum Wirkungsmechanismus cocarcinogener Pflanzeninhaltsstoffe. Planta Med 22:241–266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaerdes J (1966/67) Über südwestafrikanische Pfeilgifte. In: Journal. Windhoek, South West Africa (Vol 21, pp 33–89)

  • Gschwendt M, Hecker E (1973) Über die Wirkstoffe der Euphorbiaceen I. Hautreizende und cocarcinogene Faktoren aus Euphorbia cooperi NEBr. Z Krebsforsch 80:335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gschwendt M, Hecker E (1974) Über die Wirkstoffe der Euphorbiaceen II. Hautreizende und cocarcinogene Faktoren aus Euphorbia triangularis Desf. Z Krebsfosch 81:193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker E (1955) Verteilungsverfahren im Laboratorium. Monographie Nr 67 zu „Angewandte Chemie” und „Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik”. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim/Bergstraße

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecker E (1963) Der Mechanismus multiplikativer Verteilungsverfahren. Naturwissenschaften 50:165–171, 240–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecker E (1968) Cocarcinogenic principles from the seed oil of croton tiglium and from other Euphorbiaceae. Cancer Res 28:2338–2348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker E (1971) Isolation and characterization of the cocarcinogenic principles from croton oil. In: Bush H (ed) Methods in cancer research. Academic Press, New York, London (Vol 6, pp 439–484)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecker E (1972) Aktuelle Probleme der Krebsentstehung. Z Krebsforsch 78:99–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker E, Schmidt R (1974) Phorbol esters, the irritants and cocarcinogens of Croton tiglium L. Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products 31:377–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juritz CF (1925) The problem of Noors honey. J Dep Agric: 334–337

  • Karimi M (1973) The arrow poisons. East African Literature Bureau, Nairobi, Dar es Salaam, Kampala

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotter H, Opferkuch HJ, Hecker E (1979) Crystal structure and stereochemistry of ingol-3.7.8.12-tetraacetate. Tetrahedron Letters: 77–78

  • McDonald AD, Warren FL, Williams JM (1949) The Euphorbia resins. Part I. Euphol. J Chem Soc: 155–157

  • Matthews JS (1963) Steroids. CXXIII. Color reagent for steroids in thin layer chromatography. Biochem Biophys Acta 69:163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menard E, Wyler H, Hiestand A, Agrigoni A, Jäger C, Ruzicka L (1955) Triterpenes. CLXXXVIII. Proof of the constitution and configuration of tirucallol, euphol, euphorbol, elemadienol- and elemadienoic acid. Helv Chim Acta 38:1517

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemethy EK, Otvos JW, Calvin M (1979) Analysis of extractables from one Euphorbia. JOACS 56:957–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbold GT, Spring FS (1944) Isolation of euphol and euphorbol from euphorbium. J Chem Soc: 249

  • Opferkuch HJ (1973) Diterpenenoide Inhaltsstoffe aus dem Latex von Euphorbia ingens. Dissertation Universität Heidelberg

  • Opferkuch HJ, Hecker E (1971) Über ein neues Carcinogen aus Euphorbia ingens. In: Lettrè H, Wagner G (eds) Aktuelle Probleme aus dem Gebiet der Cancerologie III. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Opferkuch HJ, Hecker E (1973) Ingol—a new macrocyclic diterpene alcohol from Euphorbia ingens. Tetrahedron Letters:3611–3614

  • Opferkuch HJ, Hecker E (1974) New diterpenoid irritants from Euphorbia ingens. Tetrahedron Letters:261–264

  • Opferkuch HJ, Adolf W, Sorg B, Kusumoto S, Hecker E (1981) Zur Chemie des Ingenols I. Ingenol und einige seiner Derivate. Z Naturforsch 36b:878–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe FJC (1960) Some newly discovered tumor-promoting substances. Akademie-Verlag-Berlin, Berliner Symposium über Fragen der Carcinogenese, 11.–16.12. 1959, Abhandlungen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse für Medizin, Jahrgang 1960, Nr 3, 1960 (S. 36–52)

  • Roe FJC, Peirce WEH (1961) Tumor promotion by Euphorbia latices. Cancer Res 21:338–344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watt JM, Breyer-Brandwijk MG (1962) The medicinal and poisonous plants of Southern and Eastern Africa. Livingstone, Edingburgh London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister K, Brandl F, Hoppe W, Hecker E, Opferkuch HJ, Adolf W (1970) Structure determination of the new tetracyclic diterpene ingenoltriacetate with triple product methods. Tetrahedron Letters: 4075–4078

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

See part III, Adolf and Hecker (1975)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Opferkuch, H.J., Hecker, E. On the active principles of the spurge family (Euphorbiaceae). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 103, 255–268 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00409701

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00409701

Key words

Navigation