Skip to main content
Log in

Cost of reproduction: parental survival and production of recruits in the Willow Tit Parus montanus

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Brood sizes of the Willow Tit were altered experimentally by subtracting or adding two nestlings in 1986 and 1987 in the vicinity of Oulu, northern Finland. The manipulated broods were within the normal range observed in natural conditions. Unaltered broods were used as controls. Data from natural broods from 1978–1985 were available for comparison. When the nestlings were 13 days old they were ringed and weighed and their tarsus, wing, and tail lengths were measured. On the same day the parents were caught, weighed, and measured. In 1986 there were no differences in nestling mortality between the reduced, control, or enlarged broods; i.e. parents were able to fledge the two extra young. In 1987 starvation was most pronounced in the enlarged broods. This resulted in the number of fledglings being practically the same in each manipulation category. Especially the body weight, but also the other indices of body size, decreased as a function of the brood size category, suggesting that there may be quality differences between the young reared in different experimental groups. In 1986 there was a non-significant trend towards lower body weight of the parents attending reduced, control, or enlarged broods, in that order. In 1987 the differences were much smaller. These results were not due to size differences between the groups, so possibly the increased reproductive effort of raising extra young was responsible for the trend observed in 1986. There were no significant differences in parental survival associated with the manipulation category, although the trend in the females was consistent with the hypothesis of reproductive cost. It is possible that environmental conditions in 1986 were so favourable that the tits were not unduly stressed even when attending two extra young. Correlative data from 1978–1985 did not support the cost hypothesis either. A non-significant trend towards reduced post-fledging survival and recruitment of the young was observed with increased brood size. The average fitness value of parents, incorporating parental survival and number of recruits, showed that the success of the adults raising enlarged broods may be lower than that of others. It seems that the reproductive cost, if it exists, decreases individual fitness value by reducing the chances of recruiting descendants into the next generation. The reproductive stress may be insufficient to reduce the subsequent survival of parents. More data are however needed to confirm these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo RV, Lundberg A (1986) Heritability and selection on tarsus length in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). Evolution 40:574–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Alerstam T, Högstedt G (1984) How important is clutch size dependent adult mortality? Oikos 43:253–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Askenmo C (1977) Effects of addition and removal of nestlings on nestling weight, nestling survival, and female weight loss in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca (Pallas). Ornis Scand 8:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Askenmo C (1979) Reproductive effort and return rate of male pied flycatchers. Am Nat 114:748–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Askenmo C (1982) Clutch size flexibility in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ardea 70:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Balen JH van (1973) A comparative study of the breeding ecology of the Great Tit Parus major in different habitats. Ardea 61:1–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson H, Rydén O (1983) Parental feeding rate in relation to begging behavior in asynchronously hatched broods of the Great Tit Parus major. An experimental study. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:243–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer-Hazewinkel J den (1987) On the cost of reproduction: parental survival and production of second clutches in the great tit. Ardea 75:99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS, Perrins CM (1987) Optimizing great tit clutch size in a fluctuating enviroment. Ecology 68:142–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant DM (1975) Breeding biology of House Martins Delichon urbica in relation to aerial insect abundance. Ibis 117:180–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant DM (1979) Reproductive costs in house martin (Delichon urbica). J Anim Ecol 48:655–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant DM, Westerterp KR (1983) Time and energy limits to brood size in house martins (Delichon urbica). J Anim Ecol 52:905–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse P, Kania W (1970) Akcja Baltycka 1961–1967 Metody pracy (Operation Baltic 1961–1967. Working methods). Acta Orn 12:231–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Krebs JR (1974) On clutch-size and fitness. Ibis 116:217–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronmiller JR, Thompson CF (1980) Experimental manipulation of brood size in red-winged blackbirds. Auk 97:559–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossner KA (1977) Natural selection and clutch size in the European Starling. Ecology 58:885–892

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSteven D (1980) Clutch size, breeding success, and parental survival in the tree swallow (Iridoprocne bicolor). Evolution 34:278–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J (1979) Seasonal changes in demographic parameters of two coniferous forest tit species during the non-breeding season, with aspects of their relation to the territorial system and population dynamics. Ph D Thesis, Dept Zool, Univ Gothenberg

  • Ekman J (1984) Density-dependent seasonal mortality and population fluctuations of the temperate-zone willow tit (Parus montanus). J Anim Ecol 53:119–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J, Askenmo C (1986) Reproductive cost, age-specific survival and a comparison of the reproductive strategy in two European tits (Genus Parus). Evolution 40:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Freed LA (1981) Loss of mass in breeding wrens: stress or adaptation? Ecology 62:1179–1186

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett MC (1976) Some aspects of body-size in the Great Tit. Ph D Thesis, Dept Zool, Univ Oxford

  • Gustafsson L (1985) Fitness factors in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis Temm. Ph D Thesis, Dept Zool, Univ Uppsala

  • Haartman L von (1949) Der Trauerfliegenschnäpper. Acta Zool Fennica 56:1–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegner RE, Wingfield JC (1987) Effects of brood-size manipulations on parental investment, breeding success, and reproductive endocrinology of house sparrows. Auk 104:470–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Högstedt G (1980) Evolution of clutch size in birds: adaptive variation in relation to territory quality. Science 210:1148–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Högstedt G (1981) Should there be a positive or negative correlation between survival of adults in a bird population and their clutch size? Am Nat 118:568–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussell DJT (1972) Factors affecting clutch size in arctic passerines. Ecol Monographs 42:317–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Källander H (1983) Aspects of the breeding biology, migratory movements, winter survival, and population fluctuations in the Great Tit Parus major and the Blue Tit P. caeruleus. Ph D Thesis, Dept Anim Ecol, Univ Lund

  • Koivula K, Orell M (1988) Social rank and winter survival in the willow tit Parus montanus. Ornis Fennica 65 (in press)

  • Kluyver HN (1961) Food consumption in relation to habitat in breeding chickadees. Auk 78:532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluyver HN (1963) The determination of reproductive rates in Paridae Proc XIII Int Orn Congr: 760–716

  • Korpimäki E (1988) Costs of reproduction and success of manipulated broods under varying food conditions in Tengmalm's owl. J Anim Ecol 57 (in press)

  • Lack D (1947) The significance of clutch size. I. Intraspecific variation. Ibis 89:302–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1966) Population studies of birds. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TE (1987) Food as a limit on breeding birds: a life-history perspective. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18:453–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy MT (1983) Clutch size in the eastern kingbird: factors affecting nestling survival. Auk 100:326–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Neub M (1979) Brutbiologische Konsequenzen des asynchronen Schlüpfens bei Kohlmeise (Parus major) and Blaumeise (Parus caeruleus). J Orn 120:196–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Noordwijk AJ van, Jong G de (1986) Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat 128:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg RA (1981) Temporary weight decrease in breeding birds may result in more fledged young. Am Nat 118:838–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Nur N (1984a) The consequences of brood size for breeding blue tits I. Adult survival, weight change and the cost of reproduction. J Anim Ecol 53:479–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Nur N (1984b) The consequences of brood size for breeding blue tits II. Nestling weight offspring survival and optimal brood size. J Anim Ecol 53:497–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Nur N (1984c) Feeding frequencies of nestling blue tits (Parus caeruleus): costs, benefits and a model of optimal feeding frequency. Oecologia (Berlin) 65:125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor RJ (1978) Brood reduction in birds: selection for fratricide, infanticide and suicide. Anim Behav 26:79–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Orell M (1988) Population fluctuation and survival of Great Tits Parus major dependent on food supplied by man in winter. Ibis 130 (in press)

  • Orell M, Ojanen M (1983) Breeding biology and population dynamics of the willow tit Parus montanus. Ann Zool Fennici 20:99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Orell, M, Ojanen M (1986) Relation of fitness of female Great Tits to clutch size and number of broods. Ornis Fennica 63:120–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrins CM (1965) Population fluctuations and clutch-size in the great tit, Parus major L. J Anim Ecol 34:601–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrins CM, Moss D (1975) Reproductive rates in the great tit. J Anim Ecol 44:695–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponowska B (1979) The effect of energy and building resources of females on the production of house sparrow (Passer domesticus (L.)) populations. Ekol Polska 27:363–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid WV (1987) The cost of reproduction in the glaucous-winged gull. Oecologia (Berlin) 74:458–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznick D (1985) Costs of reproduction: an evaluation of the empirical evidence. Oikos 44:257–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1981) Fitness, reproductive value, age structure, and the optimization of life history patterns. Am Nat 117:819–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE, Hussell DJT (1984) Changes in adult mass associated with the nesting cycle in the European Starling. Ornis Scand 15:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Røskaft E (1985) The effect of enlarged brood size on the future reproductive potential of the rook. J Anim Ecol 54:255–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer WM (1974) Selection for optimal life histories: the effects of age structure. Ecology 55:291–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifferli L (1978) Experimental modification of brood size among House Sparrows Passer domesticus. Ibis 120:365–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T (1982) Clutch size, nest size, and hatching asynchrony in birds: experiments with the fieldfare (Turdus pilaris). Ecology 63:1389–1399

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T (1984) Clutch size variation in birds in relation to nest predation: on the cost of reproduction. J Anim Ecol 53:945–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG, Källander, H, Nilsson J-Å (1987) Effect of experimentally altered brood size on frequency and timing of second clutches in the great tit. Auk 104:700–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JNM (1981) Does high fecundity reduce survival in song sparrows? Evolution 35:1142–1148

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1976) Life-history tactics: review of the ideas. Quart Rew Biol 51:3–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth NC (1984) Optimal reproductive success in animals with parental care Oikos 43:251–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson L (1970) Identification guide to European passerines. Stockholm

  • Tinbergen JM (1987) Costs of reproduction in the great tit: interseasonal costs associated with brood size. Ardea 75:111–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen JM, Balen JH van, Eck HM van (1985) Density dependent survival in an isolated great tit population. Kluyvers data reanalysed Ardea 73:38–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi J, Hakala T, Haukioja E (1983) Alternative Concepts of Reproductive Effort, Costs of Reproduction, and Selection in Life-History Evolution. Amer Zool 23:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkel W, Winkel D (1976) Über die brutzeitliche Gewichtsentwicklung beim Trauerschnipper (Ficedula hypoleuca). Ein Beitrag zur Frage “Belastung während der Fortpflanzungsperiode” J Orn 117:419–437

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orell, M., Koivula, K. Cost of reproduction: parental survival and production of recruits in the Willow Tit Parus montanus . Oecologia 77, 423–432 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378054

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378054

Key words

Navigation