Skip to main content
Log in

Generic examples: Seeing the general in the particular

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores some of the ambiguities inherent in the notions of generality and genericity, drawing parallels between natural language and mathematics, and thereby obliquely attacking the entrenched view that mathematics is unambiguous. Alternative ways of construing 2N, for example, suggest approaches to some of the difficulties which students find with an algebraic representation of generality. Examples are given to show that confusion of levels is widespread throughout mathematics, but that the very confusion is a source of richness of meaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adda, J.: 1982, ‘Difficulties with mathematical symbolism: synonymy and homonymy’, Visible Language 16(3), 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, L.: 1981, ‘Strategies and errors in generalised arithmetic’, Proceedings of the Fifth PME Conference, Grenoble.

  • Booth, L.: 1984, ‘Misconceptions in algebra’, Journal of Structural Learning, in press.

  • Courant, R.: ‘Reminiscences from Hilbert's Göttingen’, The Mathematical Intelligencer 3(4), 154–164.

  • Fowler, D. H.: 1973, Introducing Real Analysis, Transworld, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. (ed.): 1981, Children's Understanding of Mathematics: 11–16, John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. A.: 1978, Definiteness and Indefiniteness, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1976, Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacHale, D.: 1980, ‘The predictability of counterexamples’, American Mathematical Monthly 87(9), 752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. et al.: 1983, Routes to Algebra, Open University, Milton Keynes, (preliminary draft).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener, E.: 1978, ‘Understanding understanding mathematics’, Cognitive Science 2, 361–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, O.: 1969, The Exact Sciences in Antiquity, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D.: 1981, ‘Metaphor and analogy in mathematics’, For the Learning of Mathematics 1(3), 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D.: 1982, ‘Why the history and philosophy of mathematics should not be related X’, For the Learning of Mathematics 3(1), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D.: 1983, ‘Mathematics, students and ulterior motives’, Proceedings of the Seventh PME Conference, Israel.

  • Room, A.: 1982, A Dictionary of Trade Name Origins, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I. and Tall, D.: 1979, ‘Calculations and canonical elements’, Mathematics in School 8(4), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swetz, F. J. and Kao, T. I.: 1977, Was Pythagoras Chinese?, Pennsylvania State University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.: 1977, ‘Cognitive conflict and the learning of mathematics’, Proceedings of the First IGPME Conference, Utrecht.

  • Thornton, E. C. B.: 1970, ‘Any must go’, in Mathematical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinner, S.: 1983, ‘The notion of proof-some aspects of students' views at the senior high level’, Proceedings of the Seventh PME Conference, Israel.

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1967, Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, B. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason, J., Pimm, D. Generic examples: Seeing the general in the particular. Educ Stud Math 15, 277–289 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312078

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312078

Keywords

Navigation