Abstract
Dynamometric devices used to assess back function are becoming increasingly used in research as well as in clinical practice. These devices provide values for a variety of movement variables such as torque, displacement, and velocity, but they also enable the study of movement patterns. The purpose of this study was to determine the movement patterns of patients presenting with specific spinal pathologies. Thirteen patients with spinal stenosis and 14 patients with degenerative changes and a borderline spinal canal diameter, as well as a control group of 30 symptom-free subjects, were studied. An isoinertial trunk-testing dynamometric device was used. Sagittal velocity and position were measured against a resistance set to 50% of the subject's maximum isometric torque. A phase plane analysis (velocity against position) was performed for each subject. An ensemble averaging technique was used to average the repetitions of every subject and a normalization technique was employed to draw an average graph for each group. This graph showed distinct patterns of movement for the three groups. The differences appeared mostly during the extension phase of movement, as confirmed by statistical analysis. The spinal stenosis group showed lower velocities than the controls during the entire extension phase (P<0.05), while the borderline spinal canal group demonstrated a significant decrease in velocity at the end of the extension phase (P<0.01). These findings can be related to the increase in disk bulge and decrease in the diameter of the spinal canal during extension. This study shows the relation between some spinal pathologies and movement patterns. This type of functional assessment may be a valuable tool for assessing the relation between anatomical lesions and function and for determining the responsibility of findings such as bulging disk and/or facet syndrome in causing a patient's complaints.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams MA, Dolan P, Hutton WC (1988) The lumbar spine in backward bending. Spine 13: 19–26
Anderson JAD (1980) Back pain in industry. In: Jayson M (ed) The lumbar spine and back pain. Pitman Medical, Tunbridge Wells
Andersson GBJ, Svebsson HO, Oden A (1988) The intensity of work recovery in low back pain. Spine 8: 880
Boden SD, Davis OD, Dian TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SM (1990) Abnormal magnetic resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72: 403–408
Bolender NF, Schönstrom NS, Spengler DM (1985) Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67: 240–246
Burdorf A, Riel M van, Snijders C (1992) Trunk muscle strength measurements and prediction of low back pain among workers. Clin Biomech 7: 55–58
Dietemann JL (1995) Imagerie du rachis lombaire. Masson, Paris
Institut National des Statistiques (INS) (1990) Statistiques des accidents de travail. Exercice 1985, no. 2. INS, Bruxelles
Jensen MC, Brant-Zawdzki MN, Obuchowski N et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without low back pain. N Engl J Med 331: 69–73
Keller T, Szpalski M, Spengler D, Hayez JP (1993) Interpretation and parametrization of dynamic trunk isoinertial movements using an ensemble-averaging technique. Clin Biomech 8: 220–222
Kelsey J, White A, Pastides H (1979) The impact of musculoskeletal disorders on the population of the United States. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61: 959–964
Kirkaldy-Willys WH, Paine KW, Cauchoix J, et al (1974) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 99: 30–50
Klein RG, Eek BC (1990) Low energy laser treatment and exercise for chronic low back pain: double blind controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71: 34–37
Kroemer KH (1983) An isoinertial technique to assess individual lifting capability. Hum Factors 25: 493–506
Liyang D, Yinkan X, Wenming Z, Zhihua Z (1988) The effect of flexion-extension motion on the capacity of the spinal canal. Spine 14: 523–525
Marras WS, Wongsam PE (1986) Flexibility and velocity of normal and impaired lumbar spine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67: 213–217
Marras WS, Parnianpour M, Ferguson SA, et al (1995) The classification of anatomic and symptom-based low back disorders using motion measure models. Spine 20: 2531–2546
Nachemson A (1983) Work for all. Clin Orthop 179: 77–85
Nachemson A (1985) Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain. Int Orthop 9: 1–10
Parnianpour M (1987) The effect of fatiguing isoinertial trunk flexion and extension movement on patterns of movement and motor output. PhD dissertation, New York University, New York
Parnianpour M, Mordin M, Kahanovitz N, Frankel V (1988) The triaxial coupling of torque generation of trunk muscles during isometric exertions and the effect of fatiguing isoinertial movements on the motor output and movement patterns. Spine 13: 982–992
Parnianpour M, Nordin M, Sheikhashadeh A (1990a) The relationship of torque, velocity, and power with constant resistive load during sagittal trunk movement. Spine 15: 639–643
Parnianpour M, Özkaya N, Nordin M et al (1990b) Phase plane analysis of isoinertial trunk performance: quantitative measurement of “spinal signature”. In: Advances in Bioengineering. (BED vol 15) American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, p 51
Penning L, Wilmink JT (1987) Posture dependant bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy. Spine 12: 488–500
Postacchini F, Ripani M, Carpano S (1983) Morphometry of the lumbar vertebrae: an anatomic study in two caucasoid ethnic groups. Clin Orthop 172: 296–303
Seeds RH, Levene JA, Goldberg HM (1988) Abnormal patient data for the Isostation B100. J Sports Phys Ther 10: 121–133
Skovron ML, Szpalski M, Nordin M, Melot C, Cukier D (1994) Sociocultural factors and back pain: a population-based study in Belgian adults. Spine 19: 129–137
Snook S (1982) Low back pain in industry In: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Symposium on Idiopathic Low Back Pain. Mosby, St Louis
Szpalski M, Hayez JP (1994) Objective functional assessment of the efficacy of tenoxicam in the treatment of acute low back pain. A double blind placebo controlled study. Br J Rheumatol 33: 74–78
Szpalski M, Parnianpour M (1996) Trunk performance, strength and endurance: measurement techniques and applications. In Wiesel SW, Weinstein JN, Herkowitz H, et al (eds) The lumbar spine. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1074–1105
Szpalski M, Poty S, Hayez JP (1990) Functional dynamometric assessment of the clinical significance of the posterior disc bulging. Acta Orthop Scand 61 [Suppl 237]: 23
Szpalski M, Federspiel CF, Poty S, Hayez JP, Debaize JP (1992a) Reproducibility of trunk isoinertial dynamic performance in low back pain patients. J Spinaal Disord 5: 78–85
Szpalski M, Hayez JP, Debaize JP, Spengler DM (1992b) Velocity of trunk movements, most sensitive variable of low-back condition. A prospective study. Orthop Trans 16: 254
Trimble J, Putnam A, Colettei S, Zriny R, Zindrick M (1991) A comparison of the biodynamics of isokinetic and isoinertial trunk flexion/extension testing machines. Presented at the World Congress of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Kyoto, July 9–12, 1991
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Szpalski, M., Michel, F. & Hayez, J.P. Determination of trunk motion patterns associated with permanent or transient stenosis of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 5, 332–337 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304349
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304349