Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of trunk motion patterns associated with permanent or transient stenosis of the lumbar spine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamometric devices used to assess back function are becoming increasingly used in research as well as in clinical practice. These devices provide values for a variety of movement variables such as torque, displacement, and velocity, but they also enable the study of movement patterns. The purpose of this study was to determine the movement patterns of patients presenting with specific spinal pathologies. Thirteen patients with spinal stenosis and 14 patients with degenerative changes and a borderline spinal canal diameter, as well as a control group of 30 symptom-free subjects, were studied. An isoinertial trunk-testing dynamometric device was used. Sagittal velocity and position were measured against a resistance set to 50% of the subject's maximum isometric torque. A phase plane analysis (velocity against position) was performed for each subject. An ensemble averaging technique was used to average the repetitions of every subject and a normalization technique was employed to draw an average graph for each group. This graph showed distinct patterns of movement for the three groups. The differences appeared mostly during the extension phase of movement, as confirmed by statistical analysis. The spinal stenosis group showed lower velocities than the controls during the entire extension phase (P<0.05), while the borderline spinal canal group demonstrated a significant decrease in velocity at the end of the extension phase (P<0.01). These findings can be related to the increase in disk bulge and decrease in the diameter of the spinal canal during extension. This study shows the relation between some spinal pathologies and movement patterns. This type of functional assessment may be a valuable tool for assessing the relation between anatomical lesions and function and for determining the responsibility of findings such as bulging disk and/or facet syndrome in causing a patient's complaints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams MA, Dolan P, Hutton WC (1988) The lumbar spine in backward bending. Spine 13: 19–26

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson JAD (1980) Back pain in industry. In: Jayson M (ed) The lumbar spine and back pain. Pitman Medical, Tunbridge Wells

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson GBJ, Svebsson HO, Oden A (1988) The intensity of work recovery in low back pain. Spine 8: 880

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boden SD, Davis OD, Dian TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SM (1990) Abnormal magnetic resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72: 403–408

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bolender NF, Schönstrom NS, Spengler DM (1985) Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67: 240–246

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burdorf A, Riel M van, Snijders C (1992) Trunk muscle strength measurements and prediction of low back pain among workers. Clin Biomech 7: 55–58

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dietemann JL (1995) Imagerie du rachis lombaire. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  8. Institut National des Statistiques (INS) (1990) Statistiques des accidents de travail. Exercice 1985, no. 2. INS, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawdzki MN, Obuchowski N et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without low back pain. N Engl J Med 331: 69–73

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keller T, Szpalski M, Spengler D, Hayez JP (1993) Interpretation and parametrization of dynamic trunk isoinertial movements using an ensemble-averaging technique. Clin Biomech 8: 220–222

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kelsey J, White A, Pastides H (1979) The impact of musculoskeletal disorders on the population of the United States. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61: 959–964

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kirkaldy-Willys WH, Paine KW, Cauchoix J, et al (1974) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 99: 30–50

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klein RG, Eek BC (1990) Low energy laser treatment and exercise for chronic low back pain: double blind controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71: 34–37

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kroemer KH (1983) An isoinertial technique to assess individual lifting capability. Hum Factors 25: 493–506

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liyang D, Yinkan X, Wenming Z, Zhihua Z (1988) The effect of flexion-extension motion on the capacity of the spinal canal. Spine 14: 523–525

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marras WS, Wongsam PE (1986) Flexibility and velocity of normal and impaired lumbar spine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67: 213–217

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marras WS, Parnianpour M, Ferguson SA, et al (1995) The classification of anatomic and symptom-based low back disorders using motion measure models. Spine 20: 2531–2546

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nachemson A (1983) Work for all. Clin Orthop 179: 77–85

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nachemson A (1985) Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain. Int Orthop 9: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parnianpour M (1987) The effect of fatiguing isoinertial trunk flexion and extension movement on patterns of movement and motor output. PhD dissertation, New York University, New York

  21. Parnianpour M, Mordin M, Kahanovitz N, Frankel V (1988) The triaxial coupling of torque generation of trunk muscles during isometric exertions and the effect of fatiguing isoinertial movements on the motor output and movement patterns. Spine 13: 982–992

    Google Scholar 

  22. Parnianpour M, Nordin M, Sheikhashadeh A (1990a) The relationship of torque, velocity, and power with constant resistive load during sagittal trunk movement. Spine 15: 639–643

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parnianpour M, Özkaya N, Nordin M et al (1990b) Phase plane analysis of isoinertial trunk performance: quantitative measurement of “spinal signature”. In: Advances in Bioengineering. (BED vol 15) American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, p 51

    Google Scholar 

  24. Penning L, Wilmink JT (1987) Posture dependant bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy. Spine 12: 488–500

    Google Scholar 

  25. Postacchini F, Ripani M, Carpano S (1983) Morphometry of the lumbar vertebrae: an anatomic study in two caucasoid ethnic groups. Clin Orthop 172: 296–303

    Google Scholar 

  26. Seeds RH, Levene JA, Goldberg HM (1988) Abnormal patient data for the Isostation B100. J Sports Phys Ther 10: 121–133

    Google Scholar 

  27. Skovron ML, Szpalski M, Nordin M, Melot C, Cukier D (1994) Sociocultural factors and back pain: a population-based study in Belgian adults. Spine 19: 129–137

    Google Scholar 

  28. Snook S (1982) Low back pain in industry In: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Symposium on Idiopathic Low Back Pain. Mosby, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  29. Szpalski M, Hayez JP (1994) Objective functional assessment of the efficacy of tenoxicam in the treatment of acute low back pain. A double blind placebo controlled study. Br J Rheumatol 33: 74–78

    Google Scholar 

  30. Szpalski M, Parnianpour M (1996) Trunk performance, strength and endurance: measurement techniques and applications. In Wiesel SW, Weinstein JN, Herkowitz H, et al (eds) The lumbar spine. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1074–1105

    Google Scholar 

  31. Szpalski M, Poty S, Hayez JP (1990) Functional dynamometric assessment of the clinical significance of the posterior disc bulging. Acta Orthop Scand 61 [Suppl 237]: 23

    Google Scholar 

  32. Szpalski M, Federspiel CF, Poty S, Hayez JP, Debaize JP (1992a) Reproducibility of trunk isoinertial dynamic performance in low back pain patients. J Spinaal Disord 5: 78–85

    Google Scholar 

  33. Szpalski M, Hayez JP, Debaize JP, Spengler DM (1992b) Velocity of trunk movements, most sensitive variable of low-back condition. A prospective study. Orthop Trans 16: 254

    Google Scholar 

  34. Trimble J, Putnam A, Colettei S, Zriny R, Zindrick M (1991) A comparison of the biodynamics of isokinetic and isoinertial trunk flexion/extension testing machines. Presented at the World Congress of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Kyoto, July 9–12, 1991

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szpalski, M., Michel, F. & Hayez, J.P. Determination of trunk motion patterns associated with permanent or transient stenosis of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 5, 332–337 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304349

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304349

Key words

Navigation