Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative neurophysiological studies of hearing and vocalizations in songbirds

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Acoustic neurons in the avian cochlear nucleus are tonotopically arranged according to the sites of innervation on the basilar membrane by the connecting primary auditory fibers.

  2. 2.

    The thresholds of single units vary distinctly with their characteristic frequencies The distribution of unit thresholds matches extremely well with the behavioral audibility curve.

  3. 3.

    The numbers of units in the nucleus also vary with their CF's. The greatest number of units occurs within the frequency range in which auditory thresholds are lowest. Smaller numbers of units represent the frequency ranges higher or lower than the most sensitive region.

  4. 4.

    The upper range of single unit CF's shows distinct interspecific variation which is correlated with the differences in the range of vocal frequencies. The upper limit of CF may be correlated with the bird's size.

  5. 5.

    The lowest thresholds of single auditory neurons tend to fall uniformly between −60 and −80 DB (re. 1 dyne per cm2) among different species. The differences between the highest and lowest unit thresholds are also homogeneous (40–50 DB) among different species.

  6. 6.

    Most songbirds do not seem to produce frequencies below 1 KHz but can hear them.

  7. 7.

    The popular belief that songbirds can hear frequencies inaudible to man is not supported by reliable evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Békésy, G. V.: Über die mechanische Frequenzanalyse in der Schnecke verschiedener Tiere. Akust. Z. 8, 3–11 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The vibration of the cochlear partition in anatomical preparations and in models of the inner ear. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 21, 233–245 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Sensory inhibition. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boord, R. L., Rasmussen, G. L.: Projection of the cochlear and lagenar nerves on the cochlear nuclei of the pigeon. J. comp. Neurol. 120, 463–475 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brémond, J. C.: Reconnaissance de schémas réactogenes liés a l'information contenue dans le chant territorial du rouge-gorge. Proc. 14th Int. Ornithol. Congr., p. 217–229 (1967).

  • Capranica, R. R.: The evoked vocal response of the bullfrog. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooling, R. J.: An audibility curve for the common canary as determined by instrumental avoidance conditioning. Master's Thesis, St. Louis University (1969).

  • Falls, J. B.: Properties of bird song eliciting responses from territorial males. Proc. 13th Int. Ornithol. Congr., p. 259–271 (1963).

  • Frishkopf, L. S., Goldstein, M. M., Jr.: Responses to acoustic stimuli from single units in the eighth nerve of the bullfrog. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 35, 1219–1228 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granit, O.: Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Gehörsinnes der Vögel. Ornis Fennica 18, 49–71 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenewalt, C. H.: Bird song: Acoustics and physiology. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D.: Tungsten microelectrode for recording from single units. Science 125, 549–550 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, B. M., Boyle, A. J. F.: Basilar membrane vibration examined with the Mössbauer technique. Science 158, 389–390 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knecht, S.: Über den Gehörsinn und die Musikalität der Vögel. Z. vergl. Physiol. 27, 169–232 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiang, N. Y. S.: Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Marr, E. M., Demont, D.: Sensitivity of auditory-nerve fibers to tone stimuli. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 42, 1206 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewy, F. H., Kobrak, H. G.: The neuronal projection of the cochlear spirals on the primary acoustic centers. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. 35, 839–852 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J. A., Olsen, K. C.: Communication in canary courtship calls. In: Bird vocalizations (edit. by Hinde, R. A.), p. 165–184. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. E., Galambos, R., Hughes, R. J.: Organization of frequency sensitive neurons in the cochlear nuclear complex of the cat, chap. 9 in: Neural mechanisms of the auditory and vestibular systems (edit. by Rasmussen, G. L., and W. F. Windle). Springfield, Illinois: Ch. C. Thomas Co. 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuknecht, H. F.: Neuroanatomical correlates of auditory sensitivity and pitch discrimination in the cat, chap. 6 in: Neural mechanisms of the auditory and vestibular systems (edit. by Rasmussen, G. L., and W. F. Windle). Springfield, Ill.: Ch. C. Thomas Co. 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzkopff, J.: On the hearing of birds. Auk 72, 340–341 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Über nervenphysiologische Resonanz im Acusticus-System des Wellensittichs. Z. Naturforsch. 136, 205–208 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Winter, P.: Zur Anatomie der Vogel-Cochlea unter natürlichen Bedingungen. Biol. Zbl. 79, 607–625 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trainer, J. E.: The auditory acuity of certain birds. Ph. D. Thesis, Cornell University

  • Wassiljew, Ph. M.: Über das Unterscheidungsvermögen der Vögel für die hohen Töne. Z. vergl. Physiol. 19, 424–438 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wever, E. G.: The cochlear potentials and their relation to hearing. Ann. Otol. (St. Louis) 68, 975–990 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grants GB 5697 and GB 12729. I thank Dr. P. Marler, Dr. W. Lanyon and Mr. G. A. Manley for their generous assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Konishi, M. Comparative neurophysiological studies of hearing and vocalizations in songbirds. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 66, 257–272 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297829

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297829

Keywords

Navigation