Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Physiological recordings were made from single units in the two divisions of the chick cochlear nucleus — nucleus angularis (NA) and nucleus magnocellularis (NM). Sound evoked responses were obtained in an effort to quantify functional differences between the two nuclei. In particular, it was of interest to determine if nucleus angularis and magnocellularis code for separate features of sound stimuli, such as temporal and intensity information. The principal findings are:

  1. 1.

    Spontaneous activity patterns in the two nuclei are very different. Neurons in nucleus angularis tend to have low spontaneous discharge rates while magnocellular units have high levels of spontaneous firing.

  2. 2.

    Frequency tuning curves recorded in both nuclei are similar in form, although the best thresholds of NA units are about 10 dB more sensitive than their NM counterparts across the entire frequency range. A wide spread of neural thresholds is evident in both NA and NM.

  3. 3.

    Large driven increases in discharge rate are seen in both NA and NM. Rate intensity functions from NM units are all monotonic, while a substantial percentage (22%) of NA units respond to increased sound level in a nonmonotonic fashion.

  4. 4.

    Most NA units with characteristic frequencies (CF) above 1000 Hz respond to sound stimuli at CF as ‘choppers’, while units with CF's below 1000 Hz are ‘primary-like’. Several ‘onset’ units are also seen in NA. In contrast, all NM units show ‘primary-like’ response.

  5. 5.

    Units in both nuclei with CF's below 1000 Hz show strong neural phase-locking to stimuli at their CF. Above 1000 Hz, few NA units are phase-locked, while phase-locking in NM extends to 2000 Hz.

  6. 6.

    These results are discussed with reference to the hypothesis that NM initiates a neural pathway which codes temporal information while NA is involved primarily with intensity coding, similar in principle to the segregation of function seen in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl (Sullivan and Konishi 1984).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AVCN :

anteroventral cochlear nucleus

CF :

characteristic frequency

DCN :

dorsal cochlear nucleus

NA :

nucleus angularis

NM :

nucleus magnocellularis

PST :

post-stimulus-time

PVNC :

posteroventral cochlear nucleus

SR :

spontaneous rate

References

  • Boord RL (1969) The anatomy of the avain auditory system. Ann New York Acad Sci 167:186–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Calford MB (1988) Constraints on the coding of sound frequency imposed by the avian interaural canal. J Comp Physiol A 162:491–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Calford MB, Piddington RW (1988) Avian interaural canal enhances interaural delay. J Comp Physiol A 162:503–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr CE, Konishi M (1988) Axonal delay lines for time measurement in the owl brainstem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:8311–8315

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles RB, Aitkin LM (1979) The response properties of auditory neurons in the midbrain of the domestic fowl (Gallus gallus) to monaural and binaural stimuli. J Comp Physiol 134:241–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Collias N, Joos M (1953) The spectrographic analysis of sound signals of the domestic fowl. Behaviour 5:175–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooling RJ (1980) Behavior and psychophysics of hearing in birds. In: Popper AN, Fay RR (ed) Comparative studies of hearing in vertebrates. Springer, New York London Heidelberg, pp 261–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans EF (1975) Cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus. In: Keidel WD, Neff WD (eds) Auditory system (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol V/2). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 2–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg JM, Brown PB (1969) Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: Some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J Neurophysiol 32:613–636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb G (1971) Development of species identification in birds: An inquiry into the prenatal determinants of perception. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray L, Rubel EW (1984) Development of absolute thresholds in chickens. J Acoust Soc Am 77:1162–1172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyson RL, Overholt EM, Rubel EW (1989) Spatial summation for coding interaural time disparities in nucleus laminaris of the chick. Twelfth midwinter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. St Petersburg FL. Abstract 37

  • Jeffress LA (1948) A place theory of sound localization. J Comp Physiol Psychol 41:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Jhavari S, Morest DK (1982) Neural architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken auditory system with observations on nucleus laminaris: A light and electron microscope study. Neuroscience 7:809–836

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnscard PA (1988) North American owls. Smithsonian Institution, Washington London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettner RE, Feng J-Z, Brugge JF (1985) Postnatal development of phase-locking response to low frequency tones of auditory nerve fibers in the cat. J Neurosci 5:275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiang NYS, Watanabe T, Thomas EC, Clark LF (1965) Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Klump GM, Windt W, Curio E (1986) The great tit's (Parus major) auditory resolution in azimuth. J Comp Physiol A 158:583–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen EI, Konishi M (1978) A neural map of auditory space in the owl. Science 200:795–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi M (1965) The role of auditory feedback in the vocal behavior of the domestic fowl. Z Tierpsychol 22:770–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi M (1970) Comparative neurophysiological studies of hearing and vocalizations in songbirds. Z Vergl Physiol 66:257–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewald J (1987a) The acuity of sound localization in the pigeon (Columba livia).Naturwissenschaften 74:296–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewald J (1987b) Interaural time and intensity difference thresholds of the pigeon (Columba livia). Naturwissenschaften 74:449–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis B, Coles R (1980) Sound localization in birds. Trends Neurosci 3:102–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley GA, Gleich O, Leppelsack H-J, Oeckinghaus H (1985) Activity patterns of cochlear ganglion neurones in the starling. J Comp Physiol A 157:161–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Oertel D (1983) Synaptic responses and electrical properties of cells in brain slices of the mouse anteroventral cochlear nucleus. J Neurosci 3:2043–2053

    Google Scholar 

  • Park T, Okanoya K, Dooling R (1987) Sound localization in the budgerigar and the interaural pathways. J Acoust Soc Am 81:S28

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer RR (1966) Classification of response patterns of spike discharges for units in the cochlear nucleus: tone-burst stimulation. Exp Brain Res 1:220–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhode WS, Smith PH (1986a) Encoding timing and intensity in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 56:261–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhode WS, Smith PH (1986b) Physiological studies of the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 56:287–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose JE, Kitzes LM, Gibson MN, Hind JE (1974) Observations on phase-sensitive neurons of anteroventral cochelar nucleus of the cat: nonlinearity of cochlear output. J Neurophysiol 37:218–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubel EW, Parks TN (1975) Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei in the chicken: Tonotopic organization of n. magnocellularis and n. laminaris. J Comp Neurol 164:411–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubel EW, Parks TN (1988) Organization and development of the avian brain-stem auditory system. In: Edelman GM, Gall WE, Cowan WM (eds) Auditory function. Wiley, New York, pp 3–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs MB, Lewis RH, Young ED (1974) Discharge patterns of single fibers in the pigeon auditory nerve. Brain Res 70:431–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs MB, Sinnott JM (1978) Responses to tones of single cells in nucleus magnocellularis and nucleus angularis of the redwing blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). J Comp Physiol 126:347–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs MB, Woolf NK, Sinnott JM (1980) Response properties of neurons in the avian auditory system: comparisons with mammalian homologues and considerations of the neural encoding of complex stimuli. In: Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative studies of hearing in vertebrates. Springer, New York Heidelberg Berlin, pp 323–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan WE (1985) Classification of response patterns in cochlear nucleus of barn owl: correlation with functional response properties. J Neurophysiol 53:201–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan WE, Konishi M (1984) Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl. J Neurosci 4:1787–1799

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan WE, Konishi M (1986) Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:8400–8404

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Moiseff A, Konishi M (1984) Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl. J Neurosci 4:1781–1786

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt HF, Young ED (1980) Evidence for inhibitory interactions between neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. J Neurophysiol 44:76–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Warchol ME, Dallos P (1989) Neural response to very low-frequency sound in the avian cochlear nucleus. J Comp Physiol A 166:83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead MC, Morest DK (1981) Dual populations of efferent and afferent cochlear axons in the chicken. Neuroscience 6:2351–2365

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf NK (1980) Precise extracellular marking in the auditory nerve with high impedance micropipettes. Hearing Res 4:121–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Young ED, Brownell WE (1976) Responses to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats. J Neurophysiol 39:282–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Young SR, Rubel EW (1983) Frequency-specific projections of individual neurons in chick auditory brainstem nuclei. J Neurosci 3:1373–1378

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mark E. Warchol

    Present address: Department of Neuroscience, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Box 396, 22908, Charlottesville, Va, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Auditory Physiology Laboratory and Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, Francis Searle Bldg, 2299 Sheridan Rd., 60208, Evanston, IL, USA

    Mark E. Warchol & Peter Dallos

Authors
  1. Mark E. Warchol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Dallos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warchol, M.E., Dallos, P. Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus. J Comp Physiol A 166, 721–734 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240021

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240021

Key words

Search

Navigation