Skip to main content
Log in

Vibratory communication in a spider: female responses to synthetic male vibrations

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Adult females of the spider Cupiennius salei respond to electronically synthesized and sequentially presented models of male courtship vibration with their own vibration. By varying the different parameters contained in the ‘male’ vibration we measured the respective importance of these parameters for the attractivity of the signal and thereby defined filter properties of the female's innate releasing mechanism.

  2. 2.

    Both spectral and temporal properties of the male vibration influence the number of female responses. The carrier frequency (CF), the duration of the silent period between subsequent syllables (PD), syllable duration (SD), and syllable repetition rate (SRR) are the most important features. Acceleration amplitude, syllable shape, number of syllables per syllable series, and the change of syllable amplitude within a series are clearly less influential on the male signal's attractivity.

  3. 3.

    Vibrations eliciting a maximum number of female responses have the following properties: CF 133 Hz, SD 105 ms, PD 169 ms, SRR (at a duty cycle of 40%) 3.8/s, acceleration amplitude increasing from 10 mm/s2 to 100 mm/s2 within a series of syllables, number of syllables within a series 12 to 14. Trade-off phenomena could be demonstrated for SD and PD.

  4. 4.

    The female is rather narrowly tuned to the natural vibrations of conspecific males. There are combinations of values, however, which are more effective than natural signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CF :

carrier frequency

DC :

duty cycle

PD :

pause duration

SD :

syllable duration

SRR :

syllable repetition rate

References

  • Altevogt R (1970) Form und Funktion der vibratorischen Signale von Uca tangeri und Uca inaequalis (Crustacea, Ocypodidae). Forma Functio 2:178–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG (1982) Spiders and vibratory signals: sensory reception and behavioral significance. In: Witt PN, Rovner JS (eds) Spider communication: Mechanisms and ecological significance. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton NJ, pp 67–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG (1985) Neuroethology of the spider vibration sense. In: Barth FG (ed) Neurobiology of arachnids. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 203–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG (1986) Vibrationssinn und vibratorische Umwelt von Spinnen. Naturwissenschaften 73 (9):519–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG (1989) Sensory guidance in spider pre-copulatory behaviour. In: Barnes WJP (ed) Sensory guidance in invertebrate behaviour. Manchester University Press, Manchester (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG, Geethabali (1982) Spider vibration receptors. Threshold curves of individual slits in the metatarsal lyriform organ. J Comp Physiol 148:175–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG, Schmitt A (1989) Diversity of signal functions in spider courtship behavior. In: Elsner N, Singer W (eds) Dynamics and plasticity in neuronal systems. Proc 17th Göttingen Neurobiology Conference 1989, Thieme, Stuttgart New York, p 139

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG, Seyfarth E-A, Bleckmann H, Schüch W (1988a) Spiders of the genus Cupiennius Simon 1891 (Araneae, Ctenidae). I. Range distribution, dwelling plants, and climatic characteristics of the habitats. Oecologia 77:187–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG, Bleckmann H, Bohnenberger J, Seyfarth E-A (1988b) Spiders of the genus Cupiennius Simon 1891 (Araneae, Ctenidae). II. On the vibratory environment of a wandering spider. Oecologia 77:194–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieman CFM (1986) Acoustic differentiation and variation in planthoppers of the genus Ribautodelphax (Homoptera, Delphacidae). Neth J Zool 36:461–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty JA (1985) Trade-off phenomena in calling song recognition and phonotaxis in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol A 156:787–801

    Google Scholar 

  • Helversen D von, Helversen O von (1983) Species recognition and acoustic localization in acridid grasshoppers: a behavioral approach. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology; Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 95–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Hergenröder R, Barth FG (1983) The release of attack and escape behavior by vibratory stimuli in a wandering spider (Cupiennius salei Keys.). J Comp Physiol 152:347–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Horch KW, Salmon M (1971) Responses of the ghost crab Ocypode to acoustic stimuli. Z Tierpsychol 30:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Krafft B (1978) The recording of vibratory signals performed by spiders during courtship. Symp Zool Soc Lond 42:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmuth U, Grasshoff M, Barth FG (1984) Taxonomische Revision der Gattung Cupiennius Simon 1891 (Arachnida: Araneae). Senckenbergiania Biol 65:329–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppla G (1985) Die Balz von Cupiennius getazi und Cupiennius foliatus. Diplomarbeit, Universität Frankfurt

  • Markl H (1973) Leistungen des Vibrationssinnes bei wirbellosen Tieren. Fortschr Zool 21:100–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth E (1986) Vibratorische Balz von Cupiennius coccineus: zur ethologischen Bedeutung der Signale. Diplomarbeit, Universität Frankfurt

  • Rovner JS, Barth FG (1981) Vibratory communication through living plants by a tropical wandering spider. Science 214:464–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht R (1968) Das Trommeln der Plecopteren. Z Vergl Physiol 59:38–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht R (1975) Die Kommunikation von Sialis (Megaloptera) durch Vibrationssignale. J Insect Physiol 21:305–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon M (1965) Waving display and sound production in Uca pugilator, with comparisons to U. minax and U. pugnax. Zoologica (NY) 50:123–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüch W, Barth FG (1985) Temporal patterns in the vibratory courtship signals of the wandering spider Cupiennius salei Keys. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:263–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüch W, Barth FG (1986) Verhaltensantwort eines Spinnenweibchens auf synthetische vibratorische Balzsignale des Männchens (Cupiennius salei Keys.). Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 79:238

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck-Hergenröder J, Barth FG (1987) Tuning of vibration sensitive neurons in the central nervous system of a wandering spider, Cupiennius salei Keys. J Comp Physiol A 160:467–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout JF, McGhee RW (1988) Attractiveness of the male Acheta domestica calling song to females. II. The relative importance of syllable period, intensity, and chirp rate. J Comp Physiol A 164:277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout JF, DeHaan CH, McGhee RW (1983) Attractiveness of the male Acheta domesticus calling song to females. I. Dependence on each of the calling song features. J Comp Physiol 153:509–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton GE, Uetz GW (1983) Communication via substratum-coupled stridulation and reproductive isolation in wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim Behav 31:164–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson J, Weber T, Huber F (1982) Auditory behavior of the cricket. II. Simplicity of calling-song recognition in Gryllus, and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J Comp Physiol 146:361–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijer PWF de (1986) Species distinctiveness and variability of acoustic calling signals in the planthopper genus Javesella (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Neth J Zool 36:162–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth E (1984) Die Bedeutung von Zeit- und Amplitudenunterschieden für die Orientierung nach vibratorischen Signalen bei Spinnen. Diplomarbeit, Universität Frankfurt

  • Zeigler DD, Stewart KW (1986) Female response thresholds of two stonefly (Plecoptera) species to computer-simulated and modified male drumming calls. Anim Behav 34:929–931

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to the memory of Bernt Linzen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schüch, W., Barth, F.G. Vibratory communication in a spider: female responses to synthetic male vibrations. J Comp Physiol A 166, 817–826 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187328

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187328

Key words

Navigation