Skip to main content
Log in

Mate choice and fitness in a hybrid frog: Rana esculenta females prefer Rana lessonae males over their own

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The evolution and maintenance of female choice based on purely genetic differences is still a controversial issue, not only for theoretical reasons, but also because of the practical difficulty of demonstrating the fitness consequences of preferences and heritability of and genetic variability in the chosen traits. We argue that hybrid systems (broadly defined) offer suitable models for studying mate choice according to genetic differences. We present such a study for European water-frogs of the “hybridogenetic” Rana lessonae/Rana esculenta complex (L/E complex). R. esculenta, originally a hybrid between R. lessonae and R. ridibunda, eliminates the L genome premeiotically and only produces eggs and sperm containing only the R. ridibunda (R) genome. Consequently, the hybrid will only persist when it lives and mates with R. lessonae in mixed populations where it can regain the lost L genome. In such mixed populations, there is strong selection against E x E matings. because these will produce no viable offspring. We tested whether females of the hybrid R. esculenta do indeed avoid their own R. exculenta males and choose males of the parental species R. lessonae instead. Eleven E females were offered a simultaenous choice between one L and one E male. Females exhibited a significant preference for L males that was determined by the type of male, rather than by its size or activity. This choice is in the direction predicted from genetics. The question of why L males “agree” to mate with E females, but L females only rarely mate with E males, is answered by a sexual asymmetry in the cost/benefit ratios of mating with the wrong type and the right size. Our results are consistent with the mating pattern found in natural populations, but further studies are needed to show that female choice really causes this pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abt G (1992) Die Rolle der Weibchenwahl bei der Fortpflanzung der Hybridart Rana esculenta. Unpubl MSc thesis, University of Zürich

  • Arak A (1983) Male-male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 181–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Arak A (1988) Female mate selection in the natterjack toad: active choice or passive attraction? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:317–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:113–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1989) Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature 341:497–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger L (1968) Morphology of the F1 generation of various crosses within the Rana esculenta complex. Acta Zool Cracov 13:301–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger L (1976) Hybrids of B-2 generations of European water frogs (Rana esculenta complex). Ann Zool Warsaw 33:201–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger L (1977) Systematics and hybridization in the Rana esculenta complex. In: Taylor DH, Guttmann SI (eds) The reproductive biology of amphibians. Plenum Press, New York, pp 367–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger L (1983) Western Palearctic water frogs (Amphibia, Ranidae): systematics, genetics and population compositions. Experientia 39:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair WF (1964) Isolating mechanisms and interspecific interactions in anuran amphibians. Q Rev Biol 39:334–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenhorn H (1974) Soziale Organisation einer Mischpopulation von Rana lessonae Camerano and Rana esculenta Linnaeus. Unpubl PhD thesis, Univesity of Zürich

  • Blankenhorn H (1977) Reproduction and mating behaviour in Rana lessonae - Rana esculenta mixed populations. In: Taylor DH, Guttman SI (eds) The reproductive biology of amphibians. Plenum Press, New York, pp 389–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenhorn HJ, Heusser H, Vogel P (1971) Drei Ph-notypen von Grünfröschen aus dem Rana esculenta-Komplex in der Schweiz. Rev Suisse Zool 78:1242–1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Anderson MB (eds) (1987) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzoska J (1980) Quantitative studies on the elicitation of the electrodermal response by calls and synthetic acoustical stimuli in Rana lessonae Camerano, Rana r. ridibunda Pallas and the hybrid Rana “esculenta” L. (Anura, Amphibia). Behav Proc 5:113–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Halliday TR (1977) Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo. Nature 269:56–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST (1976) Lek organization and mating strategies in the bullfrog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:283–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC (1988) Acoustic properties used in call recognition by frogs and toads. In: Fritsch B, Hethington T, Ryan M, Wilcynski W, Walkowiak W (eds) The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. John Wiley, New York, pp 455–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC (1991) Female choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim Behav 42:615–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf J-D, Müller WP (1979) Experimental gynogenesis provides evidence of hybridogenetic reproduction in the Rana esculentá complex. Experientia 35:1574–1576

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf J-D, Polls Pelaz M (1989) Evolutionary genetics of the Rana esculenta complex. In: Dawley RM, Bogart JP (eds) Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. (Bulletin 466). New York State Museum, Albany, pp 289–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1990) Do animals really recognize kin? Anim Behav 39:42–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR, Grant BR (1992) Hybridization of bird species. Science 256:193–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther R (1973) Über die verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den europäischen Grünfröschen und den Bastardcharakter von Rana esculenta L. (Anura, Amphibia). Zool Anz 190:250–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther R (1990) Die Wasserfrösche Europas (Anuren-Froschlurche). Neue Brehm Bücherei, Wittenberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday TR (1983a) Do frogs and toads choose their mates? Nature 306:226–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday TR (1983b) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday TR (1987) Physiological constraints on sexual selection. In: Bradbury JW, Anderson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 247–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RG (1990) Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. Futuyma D, Antonovics J (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, vol. 7. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 69–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Bradbury JW (1991) Sexual selection. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology — an evolutionary approach, 3rd edn. Blackwell, London, pp 203–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay DE, McPhail JD (1975) Mate selection in three-spined sticklebacks. Can J Zool 53:441–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt GM (1988) Hybrid zones — natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends Ecol Evol 3:158–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard RD (1978) The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Evolution 32:850–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Kirkpatrick M (1988) Ecological speciation by sexual selection. J Theor Biol 133:85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenington S, Coopersmith C, Williams J (1992) Genetic basis of mating preferences in wild house mice. Am Zool 32:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht LE (1976) Sexual selection in toads (Bufo americanus). Can J Zool 54:1277–1284

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1991) Theories of sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 6:146–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Notter P (1974) Zum Paarungsverhalten von Rana lessonae Cam. und Rana esculenta L. Unpubl. MSc thesis, University of Zürich

  • Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge Universtiy Press, Cambridge, pp 141–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan PL, Baker T (1987) Evolution of male pheromones in moths: Reproductive isolation through sexual selection? Science 235:205–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Polls Pelaz M, Graf J-D (1989) Triploid all-male genealogies in a Rana lessonae — Rana kl. esculenta hybridogenetic population. Poster during 1st World Congress of Herpetology, Canterbury, 11–19 September 1989

  • Radwan MM, Schneider H (1988) Social behaviour, call repertory and variation in the calls of the pool frog, Rana lessonae (Anura: Ranidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 9:329–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JGM (1986) Female choice, male strategies and the role of vocalization in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Anim Behav 34:773–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JGM (1990) Female choice increases fertilization success in the Australian frog, Uperoleia laevigata. Anim Behav 39:639–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ (1985) The Túngara frog — a study in sexual selection and communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ (1991) Sexual selection and communication in frogs. Trends Ecol Evol 6:351–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz RJ (1969) Hybridization, unisexuallity, and polypoidy in the teleost Poeciliopsis (Poecilidae) and other vertebrates. Am Nat 103:605–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Reyer H-U (1992) Performance of tadpoles from the hybridogenetic Rana esculenta complex: Interactions with pond drying and interspecific competition. Evolution 46:665–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan BK (1983) Sexual selection in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei). II. Female choice. Anim Behav 31:1011–1017

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers K (1989) Sexual selection and intra-female competition in the green poison-dart frog, Dendrobates auratus. Anim Behav 37:797–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Heinemann, London, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunner HG (1973) Das Albumin und andere Bluteiweisse bei Rana ridibunda Pallas, Rana lessonae Camerano, Rana esculenta Linné und deren Hybriden. Z Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 11:219–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunner HG (1974) Die klonale Struktur einer Wasserforschpopulation. Z Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 12:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzell T, Hotz H-J, Berger L (1980) Genome exclusion in gametogenesis by an interspecific Rana hybrid: evidence from electrophresis of individual oocytes. J Exp Zool 214:251–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel P (1973) Elektrophoretische Untersuchungen der Serumproteine von Grünfröschen aus dem Rana esculenta-Komplex. Unpubl. MSc thesis, University of Zürich

  • Waldmann B, Rice JE, Honeycut RL (1992) Kin recognition and incest avoidance in toads. Am Zool 32:18–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (1977) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25: 666–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Hedrick A (1982) Speciation and the economics of mate choice. Evol Theor 6:15–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: H.-U. Reyer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abt, G., Reyer, HU. Mate choice and fitness in a hybrid frog: Rana esculenta females prefer Rana lessonae males over their own. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32, 221–228 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166511

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166511

Keywords

Navigation