Abstract
Mate choice for compatible partners has been gaining interest during the past years, which implies that what represents a suitable male varies between females and that genetic diversity in offspring should be increased. In this context, mechanisms of mate choice for heterozygous and/or genetically dissimilar partners can be expected. To test for the presence of such mechanisms in the gregarious crustacean Armadillidium vulgare, we performed experimental crosses allowing a female to reproduce with two males. More heterozygous males had a higher paternity success whatever the number of males (only one or both males) participating in reproduction, which could result from better competing abilities or from female preference for such males. When only one male fathered a brood, this male was the most genetically dissimilar to the female, suggesting the existence of a female choice for dissimilarity. Additionally, the more genetically similar both males were to the female, the fewer offspring were produced per brood. Genetic diversity is thus likely to be involved in both pre- and post-copulatory processes, as well as to have an impact on fitness in this terrestrial isopod. This work improves our understanding of the genetic characteristics involved in mating behaviours, and provides insights on the mechanisms at the basis of genetic diversity maintenance.
Significance statement
Amongst the many parameters that can be taken into account during mate choice, genetic characteristics must not be neglected, as more and more studies highlight that what is best for one female may not be best for another. Here, we show that both heterozygosity and genetic similarity can influence paternity success in a gregarious terrestrial isopod. This could have strong implications in terms of fitness as a high genetic similarity has a negative impact on offspring number in this species. This work reflects the growing interest for genetic variables, and is positioned at the interface between molecular biology and behavioural ecology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey
Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368
Beauche F, Richard FJ (2013) The best timing of mate mearch in Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda, Oniscidea). PLoS One 8:e57737
Beltran S, Cezilly F, Boissier J (2008) Genetic dissimilarity between mates, but not male heterozygosity, influences divorce in Schistosomes. PLoS One 3:e3328
Bouchon D, Rigaud T, Juchault P (1998) Evidence for widespread Wolbachia infection in isopod crustaceans: molecular identification and host feminization. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 265:1081–1090
Bretman A, Wedell N, Tregenza T (2004) Molecular evidence of post-copulatory inbreeding avoidance in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 271:159–164
Brown JL (1997) A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behav Ecol 8:60–65
Bull CM, Cooper SJB (1999) Relatedness and avoidance of inbreeding in the lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:367–372
Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009) Fundamental concepts in genetics: the genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10:783–796
Coltman DW, Slate J (2003) Microsatellite measures of inbreeding: a meta-analysis. Evolution 57:971–983
Cotelli F, Ferraguti M, Lanzavecchia G, Loralamiadonin C (1976) Spermatozoon of Peracarida. 1. Spermatozoon of terrestrial isopods. J Ultrastruct Res 55:378–390
Durand S, Beauché F, Richard F-J, Beltran-Bech S (2015) How do females’ genetic characteristics influence male mate preference in the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare? Ethology 121:1122–1130
Fisher RA (1915) The evolution of sexual preference. The Eugenics Review 7:184
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Fitzpatrick JL, Evans JP (2014) Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance in guppies. J Evol Biol 27:2585–2594
Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT, Kempenaers B (2003) Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature 425:714–717
Frasier TR, Gillett RM, Hamilton PK, Brown MW, Kraus SD, White BN (2013) Postcopulatory selection for dissimilar gametes maintains heterozygosity in the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Ecol Evol 3:3483–3494
Fromhage L, Kokko H, Reid JM (2009) Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity. Evolution 63:684–694
Gage MJG, Surridge AK, Tomkins JL, Green E, Wiskin L, Bell DJ, Hewitt GM (2006) Reduced heterozygosity depresses sperm quality in wild rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus. Curr Biol 16:612–617
Garcia-Gonzalez F, Simmons LW (2011) Good genes and sexual selection in dung beetles (Onthophagus taurus): genetic variance in egg-to-adult and adult viability. PLoS One 6:e16233
Garcia-Navas V, Ortego J, Sanz JJ (2009) Heterozygosity-based assortative mating in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus): implications for the evolution of mate choice. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 276:2931–2940
Giraud I, Valette V, Bech N, Grandjean F, Cordaux R (2013) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci for the isopod crustacean Armadillidium vulgare and transferability in terrestrial isopods. PLoS One 8:e76639
Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2:618–620
Hoffman JI, Forcada J, Trathan PN, Amos W (2007) Female fur seals show active choice for males that are heterozygous and unrelated. Nature 445:912–914
Hoglund J, Piertney SB, Alatalo RV, Lindell J, Lundberg A, Rintamaki PT (2002) Inbreeding depression and male fitness in black grouse. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 269:711–715
Howard HW (1943) Length of life of sperms in the woodlouse Armadillidium vulgare Latr. Nature 152:331–331
Howard RW, Blomquist GJ (2005) Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annual Review of Entomology, California, pp 371–393
Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64
Jin K, Ho HN, Speed TP, Gill TJ (1995) Reproductive failure and the major histocompatibility complex. Am J Hum Genet 56:1456–1467
Kamiya T, O’Dwyer K, Westerdahl H, Senior A, Nakagawa S (2014) A quantitative review of MHC-based mating preference: the role of diversity and dissimilarity. Mol Ecol 23:5151–5163
Karino K, Niiyama H, Chiba M (2005) Horn length is the determining factor in the outcomes of escalated fights among male Japanese horned beetles, Allomyrina dichotoma L. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J Insect Behav 18:805–815
Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241
Kempenaers B (2007) Mate choice and genetic quality: a review of the heterozygosity theory. In: Brockmann HJ, Roper TJ, Naguib M, Wynne Edwards KE, Barnard C, Mitani J (eds) Advances in the study of behavior, vol 37. Elsevier Academic Press Inc, San Diego, pp 189–278
Kight SL, Ozga M (2001) Costs of reproduction in the terrestrial isopod Porcellio laevis Latreille (Isopoda: Oniscidea): brood-bearing and locomotion. J Kans Entomol Soc 74:166–171
Kleinbaum DG, Klein M (2005) Survival analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York
Kokko H, Jennions MD (2008) Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J Evol Biol 21:919–948
Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjo I (1996) The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:404–408
Laloi D, Eizaguirre C, Federici P, Massot M (2011) Female choice for heterozygous mates changes along successive matings in a lizard. Behav Process 88:149–154
Lefebvre F, Limousin M, Caubet Y (2000) Sexual dimorphism in the antennae of terrestrial isopods: a result of male contests or scramble competition? Can J Zool 78:1987–1993
Lehmann L, Keller LF, Kokko H (2007) Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation. J Theor Biol 244:282–295
Lihoreau M, Zimmer C, Rivault C (2008) Mutual mate choice: when it pays both sexes to avoid inbreeding. PLoS One 3:e3365
Lovlie H, Gillingham MAF, Worley K, Pizzari T, Richardson DS (2013) Cryptic female choice favours sperm from major histocompatibility complex-dissimilar males. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 280
Manier MK, Belote JM, Berben KS, Novikov D, Stuart WT, Pitnick S (2010) Resolving mechanisms of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 328:354–357
Mazerolles MJ (2016) AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q) AIC (c). R package version 20–4 https://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg
Mitton JB, Schuster WSF, Cothran EG, Defries JC (1993) Correlation between the individual heterozygosity of parents and their offspring. Heredity 71:59–63
Moreau J, Bertin A, Caubet Y, Rigaud T (2001) Sexual selection in an isopod with Wolbachia-induced sex reversal: males prefer real females. J Evol Biol 14:388–394
Moreau J, Rigaud T (2000) Operational sex ratio in terrestrial isopods: interaction between potential rate of reproduction and Wolbachia-induced sex ratio distortion. Oikos 91:477–484
Moreau J, Rigaud T (2002) The shape of calcium carbonate deposits as an external marker for female reproductive status in terrestrial isopods. J Crustac Biol 22:353–356
Moreau J, Seguin S, Caubet Y, Rigaud T (2002) Female remating and sperm competition patterns in a terrestrial crustacean. Anim Behav 64:569–577
Müller T, Müller C (2016) Consequences of mating with siblings and nonsiblings on the reproductive success in a leaf beetle. Ecol Evol 6:3185–3197
Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2005) Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol Ecol 14:19–38
Nietlisbach P, Hadfield JD (2015) Heritability of heterozygosity offers a new way of understanding why dominant gene action contributes to additive genetic variance. Evolution 69:1948–1952
Olsson M, Shine R, Madsen T, Gullberg A, Tegelstrom H (1996) Sperm selection by females. Nature 383:585–585
Palumbi SR (1999) All males are not created equal: fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:12632–12637
Pizzari T, Birkhead TR (2000) Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature 405:787–789
Development Core Team R (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-projectorg/
Rossiter SJ, Jones G, Ransome RD, Barratt EM (2001) Outbreeding increases offspring survival in wild greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum). Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 268:1055–1061
Ryder TB, Tori WP, Blake JG, Loiselle BA, Parker PG (2010) Mate choice for genetic quality: a test of the heterozygosity and compatibility hypotheses in a lek-breeding bird. Behav Ecol 21:203–210
Sillén-Tullberg B (1985) Relationship between rocking behaviour and copulation termination in Lygaeus equestris. Physiol Entomol 10:235–240
Simmons LW (2005) The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. In: Annual review of ecology evolution and systematics. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, pp 125–146
Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Marshall TC, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH (2000) Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 267:1657–1662
Surbida KL, Wright JC (2001) Embryo tolerance and maternal control of the marsupial environment in Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Oniscidea). Physiol Biochem Zool 74:894–906
Takeda N (1984) The aggregation phenomenon in terrestrial isopods. Symp Zool Soc Lond:381–404
Therneau TM (2015) coxme: mixed effects cox models. R package version 22–4 http://cran.r-project.org/package=coxme
Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol Ecol 9:1013–1027
Tregenza T, Wedell N (2002) Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415:71–73
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, IL, pp 136–179
Valette V, Durand S, Bech N, Grandjean F, Beltran-Bech S (2017) Multiple paternity in a wild population of Armadillidium vulgare: influence of infection with Wolbachia? J Evol Biol 30:235–243
Vandel A (1962) Faune de France 66, Isopodes Terrestres (Deuxième Partie). Paul Lechevalier edn, Paris
Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, Fourth edn. Springer edn, New York http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/
Verne S, Puillandre N, Brunet G, Gouin N, Samollow PB, Anderson JD, Grandjean F (2006) Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare. Mol Ecol Notes 6:328–330
Wang JL (2002) An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics 160:1203–1215
Wedell N (1997) Ejaculate size in bushcrickets: the importance of being large. J Evol Biol 10:315–325
Weeks SC, Reed SK, Ott DW, Scanabissi F (2009) Inbreeding effects on sperm production in clam shrimp (Eulimnadia texana). Evol Ecol Res 11:125–134
Yasui Y (1998) The ‘genetic benefits’ of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends Ecol Evol 13:246–250
Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1996) The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 263:1711–1717
Zhang HY, He H, Chen LB, Li L, Liang MZ, Wang XF, Liu XG, He GM, Chen RS, Ma LG, Deng XW (2008) A genome-wide transcription analysis reveals a close correlation of promoter INDEL polymorphism and heterotic gene expression in rice hybrids. Mol Plant 1:720–731
Ziegler A, Suzuki S (2011) Sperm storage, sperm translocation and genitalia formation in females of the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare (Crustacea, Peracarida, Isopoda). Arthropod Struct Dev 40:64–76
Acknowledgements
We thank Daniel Guyonnet for the technical assistance in genotyping the animals. Doctoral researches of S. Durand were funded by the Région Nouvelle-Aquitaine, previously Région Poitou-Charentes. The funding is partly granted by the following 2015–2020 programs: the State-Region Planning Contracts (CPER) and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). A. Cohas is supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Project ANR-13-JSV7-0005). This work was supported by the French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and the French Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by N. Wedell
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Durand, S., Cohas, A., Braquart-Varnier, C. et al. Paternity success depends on male genetic characteristics in the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 90 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2317-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2317-1