Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An assessment of agroforestry systems in the southern USA

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An assessment of the southern USA, based on a survey of land-use professionals and a review of the literature, revealed that it is a diverse region with substantial potential for agroforestry to address a combination of problems and opportunities. The survey indicated that silvopastoral systems are the most common form of agroforestry in the region. Increased economic returns, diversification, and enhancement of the timing of cash flows were the most frequently mentioned benefits associated with the establishment of silvopastoral systems. Some of the problems associated with alley-cropping systems — less frequently observed than silvopastoral systems — were lower-than-expected productivity or profitability, damage to trees when cultivating the crop component, and labor/management skill constraints. Based on the findings of the literature review and the survey, special opportunities for implementing agroforestry systems in the region were identified, including the following: to improve marginal lands; to serve as windbreaks and buffer strips for improved water quality and wildlife habitat; to enhance the economics of selected natural pine, hardwood plantation, and pine plantation systems; and to provide specialty products on small landownerships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amacher, GS, Aust WM, Grebner D, Groninger J, Shabman L, Sullivan J and Zepp L (1996) Land Owners' Financial Returns to Reforestation of Marginal Farmlands in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain: Estimates, Interpretations, and Policy Implications. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, Unpublished document, 91 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JB, Guldin JM and Guldin RW (1991) Natural regeneration methods for loblolly and shortleaf pines. For Farmer 50: 59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin CS (1988) The influence of field windbreaks on vegetable and specially crops. Agric, Ecosyst Environ 22/23: 191–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandolin TH and Fisher RF (1991) Agroforestry systems in North America. Agrofor Syst 16: 95–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezkorowajnyj PG, Gordon AM and McBride RA (1993) The effect of cattle foot traffic on soil compaction in a silvo-pastoral system. Agrofor Syst 21: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer WD (1967) Grazing hampers development of longleaf pine seedlings in southwest Alabama. J For 65: 336–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR and Hintz DL (1988) Windbreaks for the future. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22/23: 593–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck LE (1995) Agroforestry policy issues and research directions in the US and less developed countries: insights and challenges from recent experience. Agrofor Syst 30: 57–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell GE, Lottes GJ and Dawson JO (1991) Design and development of agroforestry systems for Illinois, USA: silvicultural and economic considerations. Agrofor Syst 13: 203–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clason TR (1995) Economic implications of silvipastures on southern pine plantations. Agrofor Syst 29: 227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dangerfield CW and Harwell RL (1990) An analysis of a silvopastoral system for the marginal land in the southeast United States. Agrofor Syst 10: 187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett HE, Jones JE, Kurtz WB and Slusher JP (1991) Black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) — its design and potential as a land-use alternative. For Chron 67: 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold MA and Hanover JW (1987) Agroforestry systems for the temperate zone. Agrofor Syst 5: 109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallberg GR (1987) Agriculture chemicals in groundwater: extent and implications. Am J Alternative Agric 2: 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanover JW, Mebrathu T and Bloese P (1991) Genetic improvement of black locust: a prime agroforestry species. For Chron 67: 227–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RW, Adams DM and Mills JR (1995) The 1993 RPA Timber Assessment Update. Gen Tech Rep RM-259 Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Fort Collins, CO, 66 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson D (1991) Opportunities for agroforestry in the Mid-South. In: Henderson DR (ed) Proceedings: Mid-South Conference on Agroforestry Practices and Policies, pp 85–100. West Memphis, AR. Nov 28–29, 1990. Winrock International Institute for Agriculture Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, DB (1991) Alternative forest products. In: Henderson DR (ed) Proceedings: Mid-South Conference on Agroforestry Practices and Policies, pp 49–52. West Memphis, AR. Nov 28–29, 1990. Winrock International Institute for Agriculture Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg RL, Maizel MS and Goss DW (1994) The potential for leaching of agrichemicals used in crop production: a national perspective. J Soil Water Conser 49: 294–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz WB, Garrett HE and Kincaid WH (1984) Investment alternatives for black walnut plantation management. J For 82: 604–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JH and Hardesty LH (1992) Mapping the territory: agroforestry awareness among Washington Stateland managers. Agrofor Syst 19: 27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JH, Hardesty LH, Chapman RC and Gill SJ (1992) Agroforestry practices of non-industrial private forest landowners in Washington State. Agrofor Syst 19: 37–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis CE, Monson WG and Bonyata RJ (1985) Pensacola bahiagrass can be used to improve the forage resource when regenerating southern pines. South J Appl For 9: 254–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis CE, Tanner GW and Terry WS (1985) Double vs. single-row pine plantations for wood and forage production. South J Appl For 9: 55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance R, Sharpe JK and Sheridan JM (1986) Long-term sediment deposition in the riparian zone of a coastal plain watershed. J of Soil Water Conser 41: 266–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren GK, Conner JR and Pearson HA (1983) An economic analysis of forest grazing on four timber management situations. South J Appl For 7: 119–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Matta-Machado RP and Jordan CF (1995) Nutrient dynamics during the first three years of an alley cropping agroecosystem in southern USA. Agrofor Syst 30: 351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merwin, ML (ed) (1996) The Status, Opportunities and Needs for Agroforestry in the United States. Association for Temperate Agroforestry. Columbia, MO, 57 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead DJ (1994) Artificial regeneration techniques. In: Moorhead DJ and Coder JD (eds) Southern Hardwood Management, pp 56–58. USDA-Forest Service, Forest Service Southern Region

  • Moulton RJ (1994a) Sorting through cost-share assistance programs. Tree Farmer 53: 24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, RJ (1994b) Reforestation. In: Conference Proceedings: When Conservation Reserve Program Contracts Expire: The Policy Options. Soil and Water Conservation Society. Feb 10–11, 1994, Arlington, VA

  • Moulton RJ, Lockhart F and Snellgrove JD (1995) Tree Planting in the United States 1994. USDA-Forest Service. Washington, DC, 18 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount P (1991) Perennial intercroping. In: Henderson, DR (ed) Proceedings: Mid-South Conference on Agroforestru Practices and Policies, pp 53–56. West Memphis, AR.Nov 28–29, 1990. Winrock International Institute for Agriculture Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir JP and Pitman WD (1989) Response of the Florida legume Galactia elliottii to shade. Agrofor Syst 9: 233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers CF, Meek J, Tuller S and Weinberg A (1985) Nonpoint sources of pollution. J Soil Water Conser 40: 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton RL (1988) Windbreaks: benefit to orchard and vineyard crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22/23: 205–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson HA (1991) Silvipasture: forest grazing and agroforestry in the southern coastal plain. In: Henderson DR (ed) Proceedings: Mid-South Conference on Agroforestry Practices and Policies, pp 25–42. West Memphis, AR. Nov 28–29, 1990. Winrock International Institute for Agriculture Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson HA, Baldwin VC and Barnett JP (1990) Cattle grazing and pine survival and growth in subterranean clover pasture. Agrofor Syst 10: 161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell DS, Faulkner JL, Darr DR, Zhu Z and MacCleery DW (1993) Forest Resources of the United States, 1992. Gen Tech Rep RM-234. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Fort Collins, CO, 133 pp

  • Rials P (1984) Livestock grazing on forest range: a panel discussion by forestland managers and cattlemen. In: Linnartz NE and Johmson MK (eds) Agroforestry in the Southern United States. 33rd Annual Forestry Symposium, pp 159–174. Baton Rouge, LA

  • Rietveld WJ and Montrey H (1991) A public policy perspective of agroforestry. In: Henderson DR (ed) Proceedings: Mid-South Conference on Agroforestry Practices and Policies. West Memphis, AR. Nov 28–29, 1990. Winrock International Institute for Agriculture Development, pp 53–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JL (1991) Windbreaks and tree barriers for sustainable agriculture in the Mid-South. In: Henderson DR (ed) Proceedings: Mid-South Conference on Agroforestry Practices and Policies, pp 43–48. West Memphis, AR. Nov 28–29, 1990. Winrock International Institute for Agriculture Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule LC, Colletti JP, Liu TP, Jungst SE, Mize CW and Schultz RC (1994) Agroforestry and forestry-related practices in the Midwestern United States. Agrofor Syst 27: 79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez PA (1995) Science in agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 30: 5–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz RC, Colletti JP and Faltonson RR (1995) Agroforestry opportunities for the United States of America. Agrofor Syst 31: 117–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slusher JP (1991) Alley cropping with eastern black walnut in Missouri. In: Henderson DR (ed) Proceedings: Mid-South Conference on Agroforestry Practices and Policies, pp 13–24. West Memphis, AR. Nov 28–29, 1990. Winrock International Institute for Agriculture Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Conservation Service (1981) America's Soil and Water: Conservation and Trends. USDA. Washington, DC, 32 pp

  • Soil Conservation Service (1989) Summary Report 1987 National Resources Inventory. Iowa State Statistical Laboratory. Stat Bull No 790, 37 pp

  • Statistical Abstract of the United States (1995) US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (1989) The Second RCA Appraisal. Washington, DC

  • USDA-Forest Service (1988) The South's Fourth Forest: Alternatives for the Future. Forest Resource Report No. 24. Washington, DC, 512 pp

  • Wear DN (1993) Private Forest Investment and Softwood Production in the US South. Gen Tech Rep RM-237. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Fort Collins, CO, 11 pp

  • Wilson AA (1991) Browse agroforestry using honeylocust. For Chron 67: 232–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojtkowski PA and Cubbage FW (1991) A bordered matrix approach to the bioeconomic modeling of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 14: 81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A (1989) Agroforestry for Soil Conservation. CAB International, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziehm RW, Pearson HA, Thurow TL and Baldwin VC (1992) Agrofor Syst 20: 267–274

  • Zinkhan FC (1993) Timberland investment management organizations and other participants in forest asset markets: a survey. South J Appl For 17: 32–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan FC (1996) Public land-use professionals' perceptions of agroforestry applications in the South. South J Appl For 20: 162–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan FC and Mercer DE (1996) Agroforestry and Sustainable Systems in the South Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens. Unpublished document, 65 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources, The University of Georgia, 30602-2152, Athens, GA, USA

    F. C. Zinkhan

  2. Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Box 12254, 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

    D. E. Mercer

Authors
  1. F. C. Zinkhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. E. Mercer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zinkhan, F.C., Mercer, D.E. An assessment of agroforestry systems in the southern USA. Agroforest Syst 35, 303–321 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044460

Key words

Search

Navigation