Skip to main content
Log in

Agroforestry and forestry-related practices in the Midwestern United States

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey, conducted in 1990–1991 on agroforestry and forestry-related systems in eight Midwestern states, showed that three traditional and three nontraditional agroforestry systems are practiced in the region. Of 46 traditional systems reported, most common was agrisilviculture (28), then silvipasture (12) and agrisilvipasture (6). These systems often involved corn, soybeans, and hay planted with tree species for nut, timber, or Christmas tree production, and cattle. Non-traditional agroforestry systems were field windbreaks/shelterbelts (29), treeshrub intercropping systems (21), and boundary plantings (11). These systems involved a variety of northern hardwood species evergreens, and shrubs. There was also a preponderance of specialized systems (97) of growing trees with the production of mushrooms, nuts, syrup, wildlife, and other nonwood products. The survey is exploratory in nature and, although the results may not represent a complete count of people involved with agroforestry in the region, the numbers reported may indicate where a practice may be prevalent. The results reflect the fact that much work still needs to be done by agroforesters in this region. They also provide some basis for further research on more suitable systems, and for identifying other researchable questions on agroforestry for the region. The methodology also made possible a bigger nucleus for networking of agroforesters and other interested people in the Midwest. Finally, although not normally considered as agroforestry, the significance of the other specialized systems reported in this survey is that they offer varied ways of connecting forestry with other activities in a largely agricultural landscape, and that they may even be seen as opportunities for easier transition into agroforestry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott RW (1954) Woodland pasturing — are we going fast enough? Journal of Forestry 52: 431–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Agroforestry Systems (1982) What is agroforestry? Editorial. Agroforestry Systems 1(1): 8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton GW (1973) Integrating forest trees and improved pastures. In: Campbell RS and Keller WT (eds) Range Resources of the Southeastern United States, pp 41–49. Am Soc Agron Special Publ No 21, 78 pp

  • Byington EK (1990) Agroforestry in the temperate zone. In: MacDicken KG and Vergara NT (eds) Agroforestry: Classification and Management, pp 228–289, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 382 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell GE, Lottes GJ and Dawson JO (1989) An analysis of agroforestry systems in Illinois. Forestry Research Report No 89-2, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 35 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer C (1991) Cattle and woodlots can mix. The New Farm (March–April): 40–41

  • Davis LB, Johnson MK and Pearson HA (1984) Subclover in pine forests. In: Linnartz NE and Johnson MK (eds) Agroforestry in the Southern United States. 33rd Annual Forestry Symposium, pp 89–104. Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 183 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Uyl D (1945) Farm woodlands should not be grazed. Forestry 43: 729–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohoe T (1982) Cattle and timber are profitable-compatible-practical. In: Clason T (ed) Proceedings of Symposium on Multiple Use Land Management for Nonindustrial Pine Forest Landowners, pp 61–65. Ruston, LA, 17–18 March, 1982, 110 pp

  • Garret HE and Kurtz WB (1983) Silvicultural and economic relationships of integrated forestry-farming with black walnut. Agroforestry Systems 1(3): 245–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold MA and Hanover JW (1987) Agroforestry systems for the temperate zone. Agroforestry Systems 5(2): 109–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonsalvez J (1991) Notes from ‘Towards sustainable agriculture: how farmer-centered approaches can help’. A seminar presentation at the Center for Indigenous Knowledge for Agriculture and Rural Development. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 1 April, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson DR and Maurer TA (1993) Mid-south directory of agroforestry producers and researchers. Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas, August 1993, 150 pp

  • Julander O (1946) Can farmland be grazed? J Forestry 44: 211–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JH, Hardestry LH, Chapman RC and Gill SJ (1992) Agroforestry practices of Washington State non-industrial private forest land owners. Agroforestry Systems 19: 27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Leatherberry EC, Roussopoulos SM and Spencer JS Jr (1992) An analysis of Iowa's forest resources, 1990. USDA Forest Service. North Central Forest Experiment Station Resource Bulletin NC-142 67 pp

  • Lentz AN and Wright FA (1959) Cattle can destroy your woodlot. Extension Service, College of Agriculture, Rutgers-the State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 4 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis C, Burton GW, Monson WG and McCormick WC (1983) Integration of pines, pastures, and cattle in south Georgia, USA. Agroforestry Systems 1: 277–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PK (1985) Classification of agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 2: 97–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson HA (1980) Livestock in multiple-use management of southern forest range. In: Proceedings of the Southern Forest Range and Pasture Resources Symposium, New Orleans, LA, 13–14 March, 1980, 268 pp

  • Pearson HA (1982) Economic analysis of forest grazing. In: Clason T (ed) Proceedings of Symposium on Multiple Use Land Management for Nonindustrial Pine Forest Landowners, pp 77–88. Ruston, LA, 17–18 March, 1982, 110 pp

  • Pearson HA (1983) Forest grazing in the southern United States. In: Hannaway D (ed) Oregon State University College of Agriculture Science Symposium Series No 2-Foothills for Food and Forests pp 247–260, Timber Press, Beaverton, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson HA (1984) Agroforestry. In: Merkle D, Carter R and Artz JL (eds) Proceedings of the Southeastern Regional Conference on Grazing Lands and People, 10–12 December, 1984, Atlanta, GA, pp 72–79

  • Raintree JB (1991) Agroforestry in North America: the next generation. Keynote address. In: Williams P (ed) Proceedings of the First Conference on Agroforestry in North America, 13–16 August, 1989. University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 262 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Read RA (1964) Tree Windbreaks for the Central Great Plains. USDA Handbook No 250 US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 68 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule LC, Liu TP and Colletti JP (1992) Directory for agroforestry and associated tree and tree/crop systems in the Midwest. Department of Forestry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 103 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JR (1914) Soil erosion and its remedy by terracing and tree planting. Science 39: 858–862

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Soil Conservation Service (1986) Losing ground: Iowa's soil erosion menace and efforts to combat it, USDA Soil Conservation Service, Des Moines, Iowa, 24 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan FC (1993) A survey of pubic land-use professionals' perceptions of agroforestry applications in the South. Lundy-Fetterman School of Business. Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC. Unpublished document, 26 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rule, L.C., Colletti, J.P., Liu, T.P. et al. Agroforestry and forestry-related practices in the Midwestern United States. Agroforest Syst 27, 79–88 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704836

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704836

Key words

Navigation