Skip to main content

Monitoring and Analysing Students’ Systematic Behaviour – The SCY Pedagogical Agent Framework

  • Conference paper
Sustaining TEL: From Innovation to Learning and Practice (EC-TEL 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6383))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we present an agent-based architecture to monitor and analyse students’ behaviour while working with a simulation tool. This architecture is based on the blackboard principle and implemented using a TupleSpaces approach. The agents are divided into several groups according to their tasks to maximise autonomy and reusability. This separation was done with the idea of perceive-react-cycles in mind. An implemented example scenario that demonstrates how agents interact in generating meaningful context-aware student feedback is described. The visualisation of the agents’ analysis results facilitates a deeper understanding of the learners’ activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen, Z., Klahr, D.: All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development 70, 1098–1120 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Jong, T., van Joolingen, W.R.: Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research 68, 179–201 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Erman, L.D., Hayes-Roth, F., Lesser, V.R., Reddy, D.R.: The Hearsay-II speech understanding system: integrating knowledge to resolve uncertainty. ACM Comput. Surv. 12(2), 213–253 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gelernter, D.: Generative Communication in Linda. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 7(1), 80–112 (1985)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Manlove, S.A., Lazonder, A.W., de Jong, T.: Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning. Metacognition and Learning 2, 141–155 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayer, R.E.: Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist 59, 14–19 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Njoo, M., de Jong, T.: Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: Learning processes and instructional support. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30, 821–844 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tschirgi, J.E.: Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Development 51, 1–10 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Veermans, K., van Joolingen, W.R., de Jong, T.: Use of heuristics to facilitate scientific discovery learning in a simulation learning environment in a physics domain. International Journal of Science Education 28, 241–361 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weinbrenner, S., Giemza, A., Hoppe, H.U.: Engineering heterogeneous distributed learning environments using TupleSpaces as an architectural platform. In: 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wichmann, A., Leutner, D.: Inquiry Learning: multilevel support with respect to inquiry, explanations and regulation during an inquiry cycle. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 23, 117–127 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weinbrenner, S., Engler, J., Wichmann, A., Hoppe, U. (2010). Monitoring and Analysing Students’ Systematic Behaviour – The SCY Pedagogical Agent Framework. In: Wolpers, M., Kirschner, P.A., Scheffel, M., Lindstaedt, S., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Sustaining TEL: From Innovation to Learning and Practice. EC-TEL 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6383. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_61

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16019-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16020-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics