Skip to main content

Reversibility Revisited and Other Comparisons of Three Types of Polytomous IRT Models

  • Chapter
Essays on Item Response Theory

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 157))

Abstract

(1983) was the first to distinguish and to compare three different types of polytomous item response theory (IRT) models: cumulative, continuation, and partial credit models. In his research, and later in research by others, the three types of models were compared on various criteria. One of the criteria introduced in IRT modeling is the property of reversibility. In this chapter, the results of a number of comparison studies are summarized. Next, the property of reversibility is further investigated. Finally, the relationship between the three types of models and psychological reality is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akkermans, W. (1998). Studies on statistical models for polytomous items. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Twente University, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (1978). A rating scale formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (1995a). Models for measurement, precision, and the nondichotomization of graded responses. Psychometrika, 60, 7–26.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (1995b). Further remarks on nondichotomization of graded responses. Psychometrika, 60, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (1995c). Distinctive and incompatible properties of two common classes of IRT models for graded responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CITO (1999). Nederlands als tweede taal profieltoets [Dutch as a foreign language profile test]. Arnhem: CITO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.H. (1995). The derivation of polytomous Rasch models. In G.H. Fischer & I.W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 293–305). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemker, B.T. (1996). Unidimensional IRT models for polytomous items, with results for Mokken scale analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemker, B.T., Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I.W. (1995). Theoretical results and item selection from a multidimensional item bank in the Mokken IRT model for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemker, B.T., Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, I.W., & Junker, B.W. (1996). Polytomous IRT models and monotone likelihood ratio of the total score. Psychometrika, 61, 679–693.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hemker, B.T., Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, I.W., & Junker, B.W. (1997). Stochastic ordering using the latent trait and the sum score in polytomous IRT models. Psychometrika, 63, 331–347.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P.W., & Rosenbaum, P.R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models. The Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523–1543.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, P.G.W., & Roskam, E.E. (1986). Latent trait models and dichotomization of graded responses. Psychometrika, 51, 69–92.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E.L. (1959). Testing statistical hypotheses. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. V., Drasgow, F., Williams, B., McCusker, C., & Thomasson, G.L. (1992). Measuring the difference between two models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maydeu-Olivares, A., Drasgow, F., & Mead, A.D. (1994). Distinguishing among parametric item response models for polychotomous ordered data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P. (1978). A class of parametric models for the analysis of squared contingency tables with ordered categories. Biometrika, 65, 413–418.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G.J. (1995). Conceptual notes on models for discrete polytomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G.J. (1997). Polytomous item response models. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokken, R.J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis: With applications in political research. The Hague: Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I.W. (1982). Mokken scaling revisited. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 8, 145–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I.W. (1983). Item steps (Heymans Bulletin HB-83-630-EX). Groningen: University of Groningen, Vakgroep Statistiek en Meettheorie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I.W. (1986). Een vingeroefening in item response theorie voor drie geordende antwoordcategorieën [An exercise in item response theory for three ordered response categories]. In G.F. Pikkemaat & J.J.A. Moors (Eds.), Liber Amicorum Jaap Muilwijk (pp. 39–57). Groningen: Econometrisch Instituut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I.W. (1991). A weighted Loevinger H-coefficient extending Mokken scaling to multicategory items. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 37, 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I.W. (1995). Some background for item response theory and the Rasch model. In G.H. Fischer & I.W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 3–14). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I.W. (1997). Nonparametric models for polytomous responses. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likerttype data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roskam, E.E. (1995). Graded responses and joining categories: A rejoinder to Andrich’ “Models for measurement, precision, and the nondichotomization of graded responses.” Psychometrika, 60, 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent trait ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1972). A general model for free-response data. Psychometrika Monograph, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1995). Acceleration model in the heterogeneous case of the general graded response model. Psychometrika, 60, 549–572.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K., & Hemker, B.T. (1998). Nonparametric item response theory models for invariant item ordering, with results for parametric models. Psychometrika, 63, 183–200.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K., & Hemker, B.T. (in press). A taxonomy of IRT models for ordering persons and items using simple sum scores. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K., & Junker, B.W. (1996). A survey of theory and methods of invariant item ordering. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 79–105.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P., & Zanotti, M. (1981). When are probabilistic explanations possible? Synthese, 48, 191–199.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986). A taxonomy of item response models. Psychometrika, 51, 567–577.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tutz, G. (1990). Sequential item response models with an ordered response. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 39–55.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tutz, G. (1997). Sequential models for ordered responses. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 139–152). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ark, L.A. (2000). Practical consequences of stochastic ordering of the latent trait under various polytomous IRT models. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Engelenburg, G. (1997). On psychometric models for polytomous items with ordered categories within the framework of item response theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhelst, N.D., Glas, C.A.W., & De Vries, H.H. (1997). A steps model to analyze partial credit. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 123–138). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhelst, N.D., & Verstralen, H.H.F.M. (1997). Modelling sums of binary responses by the partial credit model (Measurement and Research Department Reports 97-7). Arnhem: CITO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hemker, B.T. (2001). Reversibility Revisited and Other Comparisons of Three Types of Polytomous IRT Models. In: Boomsma, A., van Duijn, M.A.J., Snijders, T.A.B. (eds) Essays on Item Response Theory. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 157. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0169-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0169-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95147-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0169-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics