Abstract
(1983) was the first to distinguish and to compare three different types of polytomous item response theory (IRT) models: cumulative, continuation, and partial credit models. In his research, and later in research by others, the three types of models were compared on various criteria. One of the criteria introduced in IRT modeling is the property of reversibility. In this chapter, the results of a number of comparison studies are summarized. Next, the property of reversibility is further investigated. Finally, the relationship between the three types of models and psychological reality is discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akkermans, W. (1998). Studies on statistical models for polytomous items. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Twente University, The Netherlands.
Andrich, D. (1978). A rating scale formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.
Andrich, D. (1995a). Models for measurement, precision, and the nondichotomization of graded responses. Psychometrika, 60, 7–26.
Andrich, D. (1995b). Further remarks on nondichotomization of graded responses. Psychometrika, 60, 37–46.
Andrich, D. (1995c). Distinctive and incompatible properties of two common classes of IRT models for graded responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 101–119.
CITO (1999). Nederlands als tweede taal profieltoets [Dutch as a foreign language profile test]. Arnhem: CITO.
Fischer, G.H. (1995). The derivation of polytomous Rasch models. In G.H. Fischer & I.W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 293–305). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hemker, B.T. (1996). Unidimensional IRT models for polytomous items, with results for Mokken scale analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Hemker, B.T., Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I.W. (1995). Theoretical results and item selection from a multidimensional item bank in the Mokken IRT model for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 337–352.
Hemker, B.T., Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, I.W., & Junker, B.W. (1996). Polytomous IRT models and monotone likelihood ratio of the total score. Psychometrika, 61, 679–693.
Hemker, B.T., Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, I.W., & Junker, B.W. (1997). Stochastic ordering using the latent trait and the sum score in polytomous IRT models. Psychometrika, 63, 331–347.
Holland, P.W., & Rosenbaum, P.R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models. The Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523–1543.
Jansen, P.G.W., & Roskam, E.E. (1986). Latent trait models and dichotomization of graded responses. Psychometrika, 51, 69–92.
Lehmann, E.L. (1959). Testing statistical hypotheses. New York: Wiley.
Levine, M. V., Drasgow, F., Williams, B., McCusker, C., & Thomasson, G.L. (1992). Measuring the difference between two models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 261–278.
Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.
Maydeu-Olivares, A., Drasgow, F., & Mead, A.D. (1994). Distinguishing among parametric item response models for polychotomous ordered data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 245–256.
McCullagh, P. (1978). A class of parametric models for the analysis of squared contingency tables with ordered categories. Biometrika, 65, 413–418.
Mellenbergh, G.J. (1995). Conceptual notes on models for discrete polytomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 91–100.
Mellenbergh, G.J. (1997). Polytomous item response models. Unpublished manuscript.
Mokken, R.J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis: With applications in political research. The Hague: Mouton.
Molenaar, I.W. (1982). Mokken scaling revisited. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 8, 145–164.
Molenaar, I.W. (1983). Item steps (Heymans Bulletin HB-83-630-EX). Groningen: University of Groningen, Vakgroep Statistiek en Meettheorie.
Molenaar, I.W. (1986). Een vingeroefening in item response theorie voor drie geordende antwoordcategorieën [An exercise in item response theory for three ordered response categories]. In G.F. Pikkemaat & J.J.A. Moors (Eds.), Liber Amicorum Jaap Muilwijk (pp. 39–57). Groningen: Econometrisch Instituut.
Molenaar, I.W. (1991). A weighted Loevinger H-coefficient extending Mokken scaling to multicategory items. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 37, 97–117.
Molenaar, I.W. (1995). Some background for item response theory and the Rasch model. In G.H. Fischer & I.W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 3–14). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Molenaar, I.W. (1997). Nonparametric models for polytomous responses. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likerttype data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 59–71.
Roskam, E.E. (1995). Graded responses and joining categories: A rejoinder to Andrich’ “Models for measurement, precision, and the nondichotomization of graded responses.” Psychometrika, 60, 27–35.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent trait ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 17.
Samejima, F. (1972). A general model for free-response data. Psychometrika Monograph, 18.
Samejima, F. (1995). Acceleration model in the heterogeneous case of the general graded response model. Psychometrika, 60, 549–572.
Sijtsma, K., & Hemker, B.T. (1998). Nonparametric item response theory models for invariant item ordering, with results for parametric models. Psychometrika, 63, 183–200.
Sijtsma, K., & Hemker, B.T. (in press). A taxonomy of IRT models for ordering persons and items using simple sum scores. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics.
Sijtsma, K., & Junker, B.W. (1996). A survey of theory and methods of invariant item ordering. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 79–105.
Suppes, P., & Zanotti, M. (1981). When are probabilistic explanations possible? Synthese, 48, 191–199.
Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986). A taxonomy of item response models. Psychometrika, 51, 567–577.
Tutz, G. (1990). Sequential item response models with an ordered response. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 39–55.
Tutz, G. (1997). Sequential models for ordered responses. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 139–152). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Van der Ark, L.A. (2000). Practical consequences of stochastic ordering of the latent trait under various polytomous IRT models. Manuscript in preparation.
Van Engelenburg, G. (1997). On psychometric models for polytomous items with ordered categories within the framework of item response theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Verhelst, N.D., Glas, C.A.W., & De Vries, H.H. (1997). A steps model to analyze partial credit. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 123–138). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Verhelst, N.D., & Verstralen, H.H.F.M. (1997). Modelling sums of binary responses by the partial credit model (Measurement and Research Department Reports 97-7). Arnhem: CITO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hemker, B.T. (2001). Reversibility Revisited and Other Comparisons of Three Types of Polytomous IRT Models. In: Boomsma, A., van Duijn, M.A.J., Snijders, T.A.B. (eds) Essays on Item Response Theory. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 157. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0169-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0169-1_15
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95147-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0169-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive