Skip to main content
Log in

Polytomous IRT models and monotone likelihood ratio of the total score

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a broad class of item response theory (IRT) models for dichotomous items the unweighted total score has monotone likelihood ratio (MLR) in the latent traitθ. In this study, it is shown that for polytomous items MLR holds for the partial credit model and a trivial generalization of this model. MLR does not necessarily hold if the slopes of the item step response functions vary over items, item steps, or both. MLR holds neither for Samejima's graded response model, nor for nonparametric versions of these three polytomous models. These results are surprising in the context of Grayson's and Huynh's results on MLR for nonparametric dichotomous IRT models, and suggest that establishing stochastic ordering properties for nonparametric polytomous IRT models will be much harder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, E. B. (1980).Discrete statistical models with social science applications. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (1978). A rating scale formulation for ordered response categories.Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories.Psychometrika, 37, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. L., & van den Wollenberg, A. L. (1993). Local homogeneity in latent trait models. A characterization of the homogeneous monotone IRT model.Psychometrika, 58, 417–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. A. (1988). Two-group classification in latent trait theory: Scores with monotone likelihood ratio.Psychometrika, 53, 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H. (1994). A new proof for monotone likelihood ratio for the sum of independent bernoulli random variables.Psychometrika, 59, 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker, B. W. (1991). Essential independence and likelihood-based ability estimation for polytomous items.Psychometrika, 56, 255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker, B. W. (1993). Conditional association, essential independence and monotone unidimensional item response models.The Annals of Statistics, 21, 1359–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L. (1959).Testing statistical hypotheses. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes.Archives of Psychology, 140, 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1980).Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring.Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, R. R., Sijtsma, K., & Smid, N. G. (1990). Theoretical and empirical comparison of the Mokken and the Rasch approach to IRT.Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokken, R. J. (1971).A theory and procedure of scale analysis. New York/Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokken, R. J., & Lewis, C. (1982). A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses.Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I. W. (1982). Mokken scaling revisited.Kwantitatieve Methoden, 3(8), 145–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I. W. (1986). Een vingeroefening in item response theorie voor drie geordende antwoordcategorieën [An exercise in item response theory for three ordered response categories]. In G. F. Pikkemaat & J. J. A. Moors (Eds.),Liber Amicorum Jaap Muilwijk (pp. 39–57). Groningen, The Netherlands: Econometrisch Instituut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I. W. (in press). Nonparametric models for polytomous responses. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.),Handbook of modern psychometrics. New York: Springer.

  • Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm.Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nielsen & Lydiche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R. (1985). Comparing distributions of item responses for two groups.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 206–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent trait ability using a response pattern of graded scores.Psychometrika Monograph No. 17, 34(4, Pt. 2).

  • Samejima, F. (1972). A general model for free-response data.Psychometrika Monograph No. 18, 37(4, Pt. 2).

  • Stout, W. F. (1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation.Psychometrika, 55, 293–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986). A taxonomy of item response models.Psychometrika, 51, 567–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhelst, N. D., & Glas, C. A. W. (1995). The one parameter logistic model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.),Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 215–237). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Hemker's research was supported by the Netherlands Research Council, Grant 575-67-034. Junker's research was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, Grant CA54852, and by the National Science Foundation, Grant DMS-94.04438.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hemker, B.T., Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, I.W. et al. Polytomous IRT models and monotone likelihood ratio of the total score. Psychometrika 61, 679–693 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294042

Key words

Navigation