Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic ordering using the latent trait and the sum score in polytomous IRT models

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a restricted class of item response theory (IRT) models for polytomous items the unweighted total score has monotone likelihood ratio (MLR) in the latent traitϑ. MLR implies two stochastic ordering (SO) properties, denoted SOM and SOL, which are both weaker than MLR, but very useful for measurement with IRT models. Therefore, these SO properties are investigated for a broader class of IRT models for which the MLR property does not hold.

In this study, first a taxonomy is given for nonparametric and parametric models for polytomous items based on the hierarchical relationship between the models. Next, it is investigated which models have the MLR property and which have the SO properties. It is shown that all models in the taxonomy possess the SOM property. However, counterexamples illustrate that many models do not, in general, possess the even more useful SOL property.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrich, D. (1978). A rating scale formulation for ordered response categories.Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories.Psychometrika, 37, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. L., & Junker, B. W. (1995).Tail-measurability in monotone latent variable models. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Ellis, J. L., & van den Wollenberg, A. L. (1993). Local homogeneity in latent trait models. A characterization of the homogeneous monotone IRT model.Psychometrika, 58, 417–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. A. (1988). Two group classification in latent trait theory: Scores with monotone likelihood ratio.Psychometrika, 53, 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemker, B. T., Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Selection of unidimensional scales from a multidimensional item bank in the polytomous Mokken IRT model.Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemker, B. T., Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, I. W., & Junker, B. W. (1996). Polytomous IRT models and monotone likelihood ratio of the total score.Psychometrika, 61, 679–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W. (1981). When are item response models consistent with observed data?Psychometrika, 46, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W. (1990). On the sampling theory foundations of item response theory models.Psychometrika, 55, 577–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models.The Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523–1543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H. (1994). A new proof for monotone likelihood ratio for the sum of independent bernoulli random variables.Psychometrika, 59, 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker, B. W. (1991). Essential independence and likelihood-based ability estimation for polytomous items.Psychometrika, 56, 255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker, B. W. (1993). Conditional association, essential independence and monotone unidimensional item response models.The Annals of Statistics, 21, 1359–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker, B. W., & Ellis, J. L. (1995).A characterization of monotone unidimensional latent variable models (CMU Statistics Department Tech. Rep. #614). Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Lehmann, E. L. (1959, 1986).Testing statistical hypotheses. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1980).Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring.Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maydeu-Olivares, A., Drasgow, F., & Mead, A. D. (1994). Distinguishing among parametric item response models for polychotomous ordered data.Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G. J. (1995). Conceptual notes on models for discrete polytomous item responses.Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokken, R. J. (1971).A theory and procedure of scale analysis. New York/Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I. W. (1982). Mokken scaling revisited.Kwantitatieve Methoden, 3 (No. 8), 145–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I. W. (1997). Nonparametric models for polytomous responses. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.),Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 369–380). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: application of an EM algorithm.Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumptions of item response theory.Psychometrika, 49, 425–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R. (1985). Comparing distributions of item responses for two groups.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 206–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent trait ability using a response pattern of graded scores.Psychometrika Monograph, No. 17.

  • Samejima, F. (1972). A general model for free-response data.Psychometrika Monograph, No 18.

  • Stout, W. F. (1987). A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionality.Psychometrika, 52, 589–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, W. F. (1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation.Psychometrika, 55, 293–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986). A taxonomy of item response models.Psychometrika, 51, 567–577.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Hemker's research was supported by the Netherlands Research Council, Grant 575-67-034. Junker's research was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, Grant CA54852, and by the National Science Foundation, Grant DMS-94.04438.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hemker, B.T., Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, I.W. et al. Stochastic ordering using the latent trait and the sum score in polytomous IRT models. Psychometrika 62, 331–347 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294555

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294555

Key words

Navigation