Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models

  • Part Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

In the data envelopment analysis (DEA) efficiency literature, qualitative characterizations of returns to scale (increasing, constant, or decreasing) are most common. In economics it is standard to use the scale elasticity as a quantification of scale properties for a production function representing efficient operations. Our contributions are to review DEA practices, apply the concept of scale elasticity from economic multi-output production theory to DEA piecewise linear frontier production functions, and develop formulas for scale elasticity for radial projections of inefficient observations in the relative interior of fully dimensional facets. The formulas are applied to both constructed and real data and show the differences between scale elasticities for the two valid projections (input and output orientations). Instead of getting qualitative measures of returns to scale only as was done earlier in the DEA literature, we now get a quantitative range of scale elasticity values providing more information to policy-makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Farrell MJ (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc A (Genl) 120: 253–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Discussion on Mr. Farrell's paper (1957). J R Stat Soc A (Genl) 120: 282–290.

  • Aigner DJ and Chu SF (1968). On estimating the industry production function. Am Econ Rev 58: 226–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afriat S (1972). Efficiency estimation of production functions. Int Econ Rev 13: 568–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond J (1974). Estimating the efficiency of production. Int Econ Rev 15: 515–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen W and van den Broeck J (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed errors. Int Econ 18: 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK and Schmidt P (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econ 6: 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW and Rhodes E (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Opl Res 2: 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR and Sarafoglou N (2002). On the origins of Data Envelopment Analysis. J Prod Anal 17: 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM and Tone K (2000). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht/Boston/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A and Cooper WW (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Mngt Sci 30: 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch R (1965). Theory of Production. D. Reidel: Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laitinen K (1980). A Theory of the Multiproduct Firm. North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam/New York/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD et al. (2003). Returns to scale in different DEA models. Eur J Oper Res (forthcoming, available online 9 June 2003 [www.sciencedirect.com], based on a paper presented at the 5th International Conference of the Decision Science Institute, in Athens, Greece, July 4–7, 1999).

  • Førsund FR (1996). On the calculation of the scale elasticity in DEA models. J Prod Anal 7: 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR and Hjalmarsson L (1996). Measuring returns to scale of piecewise linear multiple output technologies: theory and empirical evidence. Memorandum No 223, Department of Economics, School of Economics and Commercial Law, Göteborg University.

  • Banker RD (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur J Opl Res 17: 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S and Lovell CAK (1983). The structure of technical efficiency. Scand J Econ 85: 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R, Grosskopf S and Lovell CAK (1985). The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Kluwer: Boston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R and Grosskopf S (1985). A nonparametric cost approach to scale efficiency. Scand J Econ 87: 594–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J and Shen Z-H (1995). A discussion of testing DMUs' returns to scale. Eur J Opl Res 81: 590–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM and Zhu J (1998). On alternative optimal solutions in the estimation of returns to scale in DEA. Eur J Opl Res 108: 149–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thore S (1996). Economies of scale in the US computer industry: an empirical investigation using Data Envelopment Analysis. J Evol Econ 6: 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Bardhan I and Cooper WW (1996). A note on returns to scale in DEA. Eur J Opl Res 88: 583–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Chang H and Cooper WW (1996). Equivalence and implementation of alternative methods for determining returns to scale in Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur J Opl Res 89: 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golany B and Yu G (1997). Estimating returns to scale in DEA. Eur J Opl Res 103: 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM and Zhu J (1999). An investigation of returns to scale in Data Envelopment Analysis. Omega 27: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T (1999). DEA duality on returns to scale (RTS) in production and cost analyses: an occurrence of multiple solutions and differences between production-based and cost-based RTS estimates. Mngt Sci 45: 1593–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (1996). A simple characterization of returns to scale in DEA. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 39: 604–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD and Thrall RM (1992). Estimation of returns to scale using Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur J Opl Res 62: 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM and Zhu J (1999). Sensitivity and stability of the classifications of returns to scale in Data Envelopment Analysis. J Prod Anal 12: 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T (1997). Measuring efficiencies and returns to scale of Nippon Telegraph & Telephone in production and cost analyses. Mngt Sci 43: 779–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H (2000). Returns to scale and scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Opl Res 125: 93–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H (2001). Returns to scale and scale elasticity in Farrell, Russell and additive models. J Prod Anal 16: 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H (2003). Scale characterizations in a DEA directional technology distance function framework. Eur J Opl Res 144: 108–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch G (1970). Homotheticity in joint production. J Econ Theory 2: 423–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starrett DA (1977). Measuring returns to scale in the aggregate, and the scale effect of public goods. Econometrica 45: 1439–1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panzar JC and Willig RD (1977). Economies of scale in multi-output production. Q J Econ XLI: 481–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR and Hjalmarsson L (2004). Are all scales optimal in DEA? Theory and empirical evidence. J Prod Anal 21: 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R and Primont D (1995). Multi-output production and duality: Theory and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston/London/Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1978). Cost, revenue and profit functions. In: Fuss M and McFadden D (eds). Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications. Volume 1. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Chapter 1, pp 3–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR and Hjalmarsson L (1974). On the measurement of productive efficiency. Swed J Econ 76: 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR and Hjalmarsson L (1979). Generalised Farrell measures of efficiency: an application to milk processing in Swedish dairy plants. Econ J 89: 294–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R and Lovell CAK (1978). Measuring the technical efficiency of production. J Econ Theory 19: 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR and Hernæs E (1994). A comparative analysis of ferry transport in Norway. In: Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY and Seiford LM (eds). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordfecht/London, Chapter 15, pp 285–311.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klein LR (1952). A Textbook of Econometrics. Prentice-Hall Inc.: Englewood Cliffs NJ, pp 364–371 (second edition 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR and Hjalmarsson L (1979). Frontier production functions and technical progress: a study of general milk processing in Swedish dairy plants. Econometrica 47: 883–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis E (2001). Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis. A Foundation Text with Integrated Software. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell/Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krivonozhko V, Volodin AV, Sablin IA and Patrin M (2002). Calculations of marginal rates in DEA using parametric optimisation methods. In: Emrouznejad A, Green R and Krivonozhko V (eds). Proceedings of the International DEA Symposium 2002. Moscow 24–26 June 2002. International Research Institute of Management Sciences, Moscow, pp 60–67.

  • Sydsæter K and Hammond PJ (1995). Mathematics for Economic Analysis. Prentice-Hall International Inc.: Englewoods Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves DW, Christensen LR and Diewert E (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50: 1393–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen OB and Petersen NC (1996). Indicators of ill-conditioned data sets and model misspecification in Data Envelopment Analysis: an extended facet approach. Mngt Sci 42: 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund FR and Hjalmarsson L (1987). Analyses of Industrial Structure. A Putty–Clay Approach. Almqvist & Wiksell International: Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Thompson RG and Thrall RM (1996). Introduction: extensions and new development in DEA. Ann Oper Res 66: 3–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganley JA and Cubbin JS (1992). Public Sector Efficiency Measurement. Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis. North Holland: Amsterdam/London/New York/Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY and Seiford LM (1994). Basic DEA models. In: Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY and Seiford LM (eds). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London, Chapter 2, pp 23–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was written as part of the Norwegian Research Council program Efficiency in the Public Sector at the Frisch Centre, University of Oslo. It was finished while the first author was a visiting fellow at ICER, Turin Autumn 2001/Spring 2002. Additional support from the following sources is gratefully acknowledged: The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation, HSFR, Jan Wallander's Research Foundation; and Göteborg School of Economics Foundation. We are indebted to Anders Hjalmarsson for carrying out all programming and calculations, and to Vladimir Krivonozhko and Ole Olesen for valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway

    F R Førsund

  2. Göteborg University, Sweden

    L Hjalmarsson

Authors
  1. F R Førsund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L Hjalmarsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F R Førsund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Førsund, F., Hjalmarsson, L. Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models. J Oper Res Soc 55, 1023–1038 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601741

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601741

Keywords

Search

Navigation