Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design, hydrodynamic analysis, and testing of a bioinspired controllable wing mechanism with multi-locomotion modes for hybrid-driven underwater gliders

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hybrid-driven technology, which can improve the sailing performance of underwater gliders (UGs), has been successfully used in ocean observation. However, a hybrid-driven UG (HUG) with an added tail propeller is still unable to achieve backward and turning motion with a body length radius, and the hydrodynamic pitch moment acting on the HUG that is mainly caused by the fixed-wing makes it difficult to achieve high-precision attitude control during fixed-depth navigation. To solve this problem, a two-degree-of-freedom bioinspired controllable wing mechanism (CWM) is proposed to improve the maneuverability and cruising ability of HUGs. The CWM can realize five motion modes: modifying the dihedral angle or anhedral angle, changing the frontal area of the wing, switching the wing from horizontal to be a vertical rudder, flapping the wing as propulsion, and rotating the wing as a vector propeller. First, the design process of the CWM is provided, and hydrodynamic forces in each motion mode of three CWMs with different trailing edge sweepback angles (TESA) and attitude angles are analyzed through computational fluid dynamics simulation. The relationship between hydrodynamics and the attitude angles or TESA of the CWM is analyzed. Then, experiments are conducted to measure the hydrodynamics of the CWM when it is in a flapping wing mode and rotating the wing as a vector propeller, respectively. The hydrodynamic forces obtained from the simulation are consistent with data measured by a force sensor, proving the credibility of the simulated hydrodynamics. Subsequently, by applying the results of the hydrodynamic force in this study, the flapping trajectory of the wingtip is planned using the cubic spline interpolation method. Furthermore, two underwater demo vehicles with a pair of CWMs are developed, and experiments are conducted in a water tank, further validating and demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed CWM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eriksen C C, Osse T J, Light R D, et al. Seaglider: A long-range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 2001, 26: 424–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Webb D C, Simonetti P J, Jones C P. SLOCUM: An underwater glider propelled by environmental energy. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 2001, 26: 447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sherman J, Davis R E, Owens W B, et al. The autonomous underwater glider “Spray”. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 2001, 26: 437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. David M. Glider technology for ocean observations: A review. Ocean Science, 2016, 6: 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rudnick D L, Davis R E, Eriksen C C, et al. Underwater gliders for ocean research. Mar Technol Soc J, 2004, 38: 73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. Dynamic modeling and motion control strategy for deep-sea hybrid-driven underwater gliders considering hull deformation and seawater density variation. Ocean Eng, 2017, 143: 66–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wood S, Allen T, Kuhn S, et al. The development of an autonomous underwater powered glider for deep-sea biological, chemical and physical oceanography. In: Oceans 2007 Europe International Conference. Aberdeen, 2007. 151–156

  8. Fang L, Wang Y, Wang S. Development of the hybrid underwater glider petrel-II. Sea Technol, 2014, 55: 51–54

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alvarez A, Caffaz A, Caiti A, et al. Fòlaga: A low-cost autonomous underwater vehicle combining glider and AUV capabilities. Ocean Eng, 2009, 36: 24–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong H, Wu Z, Tan M, et al. Hydrodynamic analysis and verification of an innovative whale shark-like underwater glider. J Bionic Eng, 2019, 17: 123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Croll D A, Acevedo-Gutiérrez A, Tershy B R, et al. The diving behavior of blue and fin whales: Is dive duration shorter than expected based on oxygen stores? Compar Biochem Phys Part A Mole Integ Phys, 2001, 129: 797–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sudki B, Lauria M, Noca F. Robotic penguin-like propulsor with novel spherical joint. In: 66th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics. Australia, 2013. 23–30

  13. Wu Z, Yu J, Yuan J, et al. Towards a gliding robotic dolphin: Design, modeling, and experiments. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2019, 24: 260–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Song S H, Kim M S, Rodrigue H, et al. Turtle mimetic soft robot with two swimming gaits. Bioinspir Biomim, 2016, 11: 36–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu H, Li X K, Wang X D, et al. Study on the effect of winglet installation angle in vortex characteristics of separation vortex. J Eng Therm Energ Power, 2016, 31: 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  16. Neilson J L, Straley J M, Gabriele C M, et al. Non-lethal entanglement of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in fishing gear in northern Southeast Alaska. J Biogeography, 2010, 36: 452–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kosma M M, Werth A J, Szabo A R, et al. Pectoral herding: an innovative tactic for humpback whale foraging. Royal Soc Open Science, 2019, 6: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi W, Atlar M, Norman R. Detailed flow measurement of the field around tidal turbines with and without biomimetic leading-edge tubercles. Renew Energy, 2017, 111: 688–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi W, Atlar M, Norman R. Learning from humpback whales for improving the energy capturing performance of tidal turbine blades. Trends Challeng in Marit Energ Manag, 2018, 6: 479–497

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shi W, Atlar M, Rosli R, et al. Cavitation observations and noise measurements of horizontal axis tidal turbines with biomimetic blade leading-edge designs. Ocean Eng, 2016, 121: 143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shi W, Rosli R, Atlar M, et al. Hydrodynamic performance evaluation of a tidal turbine with leading-edge tubercles. Ocean Eng, 2016, 117: 246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner A, Richter K K, Ludes E, et al. Whale bone puzzles: Reconstructing and identifying historical whale skeletons using archive records, osteology, and zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry (ZooMS). J Conserv Museum Stud, 2020, 18: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tian W L. Motion characteristic analysis of a hybrid-driven underwater glider with independently controllable wings (in Chinese). J Northwestern Polytech Univ, 2013, 31: 122–128

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xie Y, Yang C, Wang P, et al. Improved performance of an underwater glider with passively rotatable wings. In: MTS/IEEE Oceans Conference. San Diego, IEEE, 2013. 1–5

  25. Arima M, Ichihashi N, Ikebuchi T. Motion characteristics of an underwater glider with independently controllable main wings. In: International Conference OCEANS 2008 and MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Ocean 2008. IEEE, 2008. 951–957

  26. Arima M, Ichihashi N, Miwa Y. Modelling and motion simulation of an underwater glider with independently controllable main wings. In: OCEANS 2009-Europe. IEEE, 2009. 472–477

  27. Isa K, Arshad M R. Neural network predictive control of propeller-driven underwater glider with controllable wings and rudder. Oceans, Waikoloa, 2012. 1–7

  28. Yang Z, Wang Y, Wu Z, et al. Mechanism design of controllable wings for autonomous underwater gliders. In: OCEANS 2014-Taipei. IEEE, 2014. 1–5

  29. Sun T S, Yang M Y, Wang Y H, et al. Parametric design and experimental verification of cicada-wing-inspired controllable wing mechanism for underwater glider. In: IFToMM Word Congress on Mechanism and Machine Science. Poalnd, 2019. 23–32

  30. Andeen, Gerry B. Robot Design Handbook. McGraw-Hill, 1988. 23–78

  31. Angeles J. Fundamentals of Robotic Mechanical Systems. Springer, 2003. 5–120

  32. Piazzi A, Visioli A. Global minimum-jerk trajectory planning of robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2000, 47: 140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang X J, Gao X H. The research on the cubic splines in robot’s trajectory planning (in Chinese). Mach Design Manuf, 2008, 3: 170–173

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tang S J, Liu Z C, Zhou Y Q, et al. Investigation on aerodynamic performance of tandem wing UAV with rear wing dihedral (in Chinese). J Beijing Inst Technol, 2015, 35: 1211–1216

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hareesha N G, Reddy S, Tanzeel A. Dihedral and anhedral convertible wing mechanism for UAV. J Emerg Technol Innov Res, 2020, 7: 87–92

    Google Scholar 

  36. Niu W, Wang S, Wang Y, et al. Stability analysis of hybrid-driven underwater glider. China Ocean Eng, 2017, 31: 528–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zheng Y, Wu Y, Tang H. A time-resolved PIV study on the force dynamics of flexible tandem wings in hovering flight. J Fluid Struct, 2016, 62: 65–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

    TongShuai Sun, YanHui Wang, ShaoQiong Yang, Cheng Wang & LianHong Zhang

  2. Qingdao Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (QNLM), Qingdao, 266237, China

    YanHui Wang, ShaoQiong Yang & LianHong Zhang

Authors
  1. TongShuai Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. YanHui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. ShaoQiong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. LianHong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YanHui Wang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0301101), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51721003), the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City (Grant No. 18JCJQJC46400), and the Aoshan Talent Cultivation Program of QNLM (Grant Nos. 2017ASTCP-OS05 and 2017ASTCP-OE01).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, T., Wang, Y., Yang, S. et al. Design, hydrodynamic analysis, and testing of a bioinspired controllable wing mechanism with multi-locomotion modes for hybrid-driven underwater gliders. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 64, 2688–2708 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1890-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1890-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation