Abstract
Accurate assessment of ecosystem service (ES) supply, demand, and flow is essential for identifying and enhancing the ES supply–demand relationship and promoting regional sustainable development. Based on the InVEST model, supply–demand ratio, coupling coordination analysis, breakpoint and field strength model, and GIS spatial analysis method, we evaluated the supply and demand of water yield, food supply, carbon storage, and soil conservation service in the Loess Plateau in 2000 and 2020 and analyzed the supply–demand relationship before and after considering the interregional ecosystem service flow (ESF). The results showed that (1) from 2000 to 2020, the supply and demand of the four types of ESs in the Loess Plateau increased. Before considering ESF, the surplus degree in water yield, food supply, and soil conservation increased, and carbon storage decreased. In most counties, the coupling coordination between the supply and demand of the soil conservation is mostly extreme incoordination and moderate incoordination, and other types of ESs are mostly reluctant coordination and moderate incoordination. The degree of incoordination in water yield and soil conservation have eased, while food supply and carbon storage have strengthened. For the comprehensive supply–demand relationship of ES, the degree of surplus and coordination increased, with most counties were in a state of surplus and coordination. (2) Water yield and soil conservation services flow primarily to the western and northwestern portions of the Loess Plateau, with a decrease in the number of flow paths but an increase in the total flow rate for the former and a decrease in flow paths and total flow rate for the latter. The food supply and carbon storage flow in all directions and the total flow rate increases, with a significant increase in the number of flow paths for carbon storage. (3) After considering ESF, the supply–demand relationship of each type of ES and the comprehensive ES supply–demand relationship are changed, in which the degree of surplus and coordination of deficit counties are significantly improved, and some counties even become surplus or improve the level of coordination. After considering ESF, the supply–demand ratio changes even more relative to the degree of coupling coordination. This study is of great significance for identifying the cross-regional transfer pattern of ES, understanding in-depth the dynamic supply–demand relationship of ES, and mitigating the mismatch between supply and demand of ES. It provides a scientific and objective theoretical basis for promoting regional sustainable development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
Assessment-Mea ME (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Washington, Dc: World Resources Institute
Bagstad KJ, Johnson GW, Voigt B, Villa F (2013) Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosyst Serv 4:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012
Bagstad KJ, Villa F, Batker D, Harrison-Cox J, Voigt B, Johnson GW (2014) From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecol Soc 19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06523-190264
Bai Y, Ochuodho TO, Yang J (2019) Impact of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Kentucky, USA. Ecol Indic 102:51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.079
Bleischwitz R, Spataru C, Vandeveer SD et al (2018) Resource nexus perspectives towards the united nations sustainable development goals. Nat Sustain 1:737–743. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0173-2
Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic 21:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, Müller F (2014) Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landsc Online 34. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201434
Chen J, Xu M, Su X, Gao J (2014) Spatial transfer of regional ecosystem service in Nanjing City. Acta Ecol Sin 34:5087–5095
Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L et al (2017) Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv 28:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans R (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
Deng CX, Zhu DM, Nie XD et al (2021) Precipitation and urban expansion caused jointly the spatiotemporal dislocation between supply and demand of water provision service. J Environ Manag 299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113660
Deng L, Shangguan ZP (2021) High quality developmental approach for soil and water conservation and ecological protection on the loess plateau. Front Agric Sci Eng 8:501–511. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2021425
Dong XB, Wang XW, Wei HJ, Fu BJ, Wang JJ, Uriarte-Ruiz M (2021) Trade-offs between local farmers’ demand for ecosystem services and ecological restoration of the Loess Plateau, China. Ecosyst Serv 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101295
Du HQ, Zhao L, Zhang PT, Li JX, Yu S (2023) Ecological compensation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on ecosystem services flow. J Environ Manag 331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117230
Feurer M, Zaehringer JG, Heinimann A, Naing SM, Blaser J, Celio E (2021b) Quantifying local ecosystem service outcomes by modelling their supply, demand and flow in Myanmar’s forest frontier landscape. J Land Use Sci 16:55–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2020.1841844
Feurer M, Rueff H, Celio E et al (2021a) Regional scale mapping of ecosystem services supply, demand, flow and mismatches in southern Myanmar. Ecosyst Serv 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101363
Fu BJ, Liu Y, Lü YH, He CS, Zeng Y, Wu BF (2011) Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the loess plateau of China. Ecol Complex 8:284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.07.003
Fu B, Wang S, Liu Y, Liu J, Liang W, Miao C (2017) Hydrogeomorphic ecosystem responses to natural and anthropogenic changes in the loess plateau of China. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 45(45):223–243. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-020552
González-García A, Palomo I, González JA, López CA, Montes C (2020) Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning. Land Use Policy 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104493
Guan Q, Hao J, Xu Y, Ren G, Kang L (2019) Zoning of agroecological management based on the relation-ship between supply and demand of ecosystem services. Resour Sci 41:1359–1373
Han Y, Gao X, Gao J, Xu Y, Liu C (2010) Typical ecosystem services and evaluation indicator system of significant eco-function areas. Ecol Environ Sci 19:2986–2992
He YM, Pan HY, Wang RS, Yao CY, Cheng JX, Zhang TY (2023) Research on the cumulative effect of multiscale ecological compensation in river basins: a case study of the Minjiang River Basin, China. Ecol Indic 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110605
Huang ZX, Zhang YL, Wang FF, Cao WZ (2021) Advancing a novel large-scale assessment integrating ecosystem service flows and real human needs: a comparison between China and the United States. J Clean Prod 314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128022
Inácio M, Miksa K, Kalinauskas M, Pereira P (2020) Mapping wild seafood potential, supply, flow and demand in Lithuania. Sci Total Environ 718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137356
Jiang C, Zhang H, Zhang Z (2018) Spatially explicit assessment of ecosystem services in China’s loess plateau: patterns, interactions, drivers, and implications. Glob Planet Chang 161:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.11.014
Jiang C, Zhang H, Wang X, Feng Y, Labzovskii L (2019) Challenging the land degradation in China’s loess plateau: benefits, limitations, sustainability, and adaptive strategies of soil and water conservation. Ecol Eng 127:135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.11.018
Jiang C, Zhao LL, Dai JL et al (2020) Examining the soil erosion responses to ecological restoration programs and landscape drivers: a spatial econometric perspective. J Arid Environ 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104255
Jiang C, Yang ZY, Wen ML et al (2021) Identifying the spatial disparities and determinants of ecosystem service balance and their implications on land use optimization. Sci Total Environ 793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148472
Klapper J, Schröter M (2021) Interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services through global trade in wild species. Ecosyst Serv 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101316
Kleemann J, Schröter M, Bagstad KJ et al (2020) Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services — a case study for Germany. Glob Environ Chang 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102051
Li GD, Li F (2019) Urban sprawl in China: differences and socioeconomic drivers. Sci Total Environ 673:367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.080
Li T, Li J, Wang YZ (2019a) Carbon sequestration service flow in the Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region of China: how it flows, what drives it, and where could be optimized? Ecol Indic 96:548–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.040
Li Y, Li Y, Fan P, Sun J, Liu Y (2019b) Land use and landscape change driven by gully land consolidation project: a case study of a typical watershed in the loess plateau. J Geogr Sci 29:719–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1623-0
Li TJ, Wang HM, Fang Z et al (2022b) Integrating river health into the supply and demand management framework for river basin ecosystem services. Sustain Prod Consum 33:189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.06.025
Li X, Sun W, Zhang D et al (2021) Evaluating water provision service at the sub-watershed scale by combining supply, demand, and spatial flow. Ecol Indic 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107745
Li K, Hou Y, Andersen PS, Xin RH, Rong YJ, Skov-Petersen H (2022a) An ecological perspective for understanding regional integration based on ecosystem service budgets, bundles, and flows: a case study of the Jinan metropolitan area in China. J Environ Manag 305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114371
Liang YJ, Hashimoto S, Liu LJ (2021) Integrated assessment of land-use/land-cover dynamics on carbon storage services in the loess plateau of China from 1995 to 2050. Ecol Indic 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106939
Liu H, Fan Y, Ding S (2016) Research progress of ecosystem service flow. Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao 27:2161–2171. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.005
Liu L, Liu C, Wang C, Li P (2019a) Supply and demand matching of ecosystem services in loess hilly region: a case study of Lanzhou. Acta Geogr Sin 74:1921–1937
Liu YX, Lü YH, Fu BJ, Harris P, Wu LH (2019b) Quantifying the spatio-temporal drivers of planned vegetation restoration on ecosystem services at a regional scale. Sci Total Environ 650:1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.082
Liu JG, Hull V, Luo JY et al (2015) Multiple telecouplings and their complex interrelationships. Ecol Soc 20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07868-200344
Liu W, Zhan JY, Zhao F et al (2022) The tradeoffs between food supply and demand from the perspective of ecosystem service flows: a case study in the Pearl River Delta, China. J Environ Manag 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113814
Locatelli B, Imbach P, Vignola R, Metzger MJ, Hidalgo E (2011) Ecosystem services and hydroelectricity in central America: modelling service flows with fuzzy logic and expert knowledge. Reg Environ Chang 11:393–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0149-x
Lorilla RS, Kalogirou S, Poirazidis K, Kefalas G (2019) Identifying spatial mismatches between the supply and demand of ecosystem services to achieve a sustainable management regime in the Ionian Islands (western Greece). Land Use Policy 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104171
Qiao X, Yang Y, Yang D (2011) Assessment of ecosystem service value transfer in Weigan River Basin, Xinjiang, China. J Desert Res 31:1008–1014
Schröter M, Koellner T, Alkemade R et al (2018) Interregional flows of ecosystem services: concepts, typology and four cases. Ecosyst Serv 31:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.003
Serna-Chavez HM, Schulp CJE, van Bodegom PM, Bouten W, Verburg PH, Davidson MD (2014) A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 39:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024
Shen JK, Wang YC (2021) Allocating and mapping ecosystem service demands with spatial flow from built-up areas to natural spaces. Sci Total Environ 798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149330
Shi L, Halik Ü, Mamat Z, Aishan T, Welp M (2021) Identifying mismatches of ecosystem services supply and demand under semi-arid conditions: the case of the oasis city Urumqi, China. Integr Environ Assess Manag 17:1293–1304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4471
Su D, Cao Y, Dong XY, Wu Q, Fang XQ, Cao Y (2024) Evaluation of ecosystem services budget based on ecosystem services flow: a case study of Hangzhou Bay area. Appl Geogr 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103150
Sun X, Tang HJ, Yang P, Hu G, Liu ZH, Wu JG (2020) Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of ecosystem service supply and demand across the conterminous united states: a multiscale analysis. Sci Total Environ 703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135005
Sun R, Jin XB, Han B, Liang XY, Zhang XL, Zhou YK (2022) Does scale matter? Analysis and measurement of ecosystem service supply and demand status based on ecological unit. Environ Impact Assess Rev 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106785
Sun SQ, Lue YH, Fu BJ (2023) Relations between physical and ecosystem service flows of freshwater are critical for water resource security in large dryland river basin. Sci Total Environ 857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159549
Tang ZL, Wang YT, Fu M (2022) Modeling the dynamic of ecosystem service supply and demand in Chengdu-Chongqing twin-city economic circle, China. Environ Res Commun 4. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac88ba
Tang H, Li Z (2012) Study on per capita grain demand based on Chinese reasonable dietary pattern. Sci Agric Sin 45:2315–2327
Timberlake M (2008) The polycentric metropolis: learning from mega-city regions in Europe. J Am Plann Assoc 74:384–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802146410
Van Hecken G, Bastiaensen J (2010) Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view. Environ Sci Policy 13:785–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.006
Villa F, Bagstad KJ, Voigt B et al (2014) A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. Plos One 9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091001
Wang X, Jia Z, Feng X et al (2023) Analysis on supply and demand balance of soil conservation service and its driving factors on the loess plateau. Acta Ecol Sin 43:2722–2733
Wang CD, Li WQ, Sun MX, Wang YT, Wang SB (2021) Exploring the formulation of ecological management policies by quantifying interregional primary ecosystem service flows in Yangtze River Delta region, China. J Environ Manag 284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112042
Wang D, Liang YJ, Peng SZ, Yin ZC, Huang JJ (2022a) Integrated assessment of the supply-demand relationship of ecosystem services in the loess plateau during 1992–2015. Ecosyst Health Sustain 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2022.2130093
Wang HC, Wang LA, Fu X et al (2022b) Spatial-temporal pattern of ecosystem service supply-demand and coordination in the Ulansuhai Basin, China. Ecol Indic 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109406
Wang XZ, Wu JZ, Liu YL, Hai XY, Shanguan ZP, Deng L (2022c) Driving factors of ecosystem services and their spatiotemporal change assessment based on land use types in the loess plateau. J Environ Manag 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114835
Wei W, Nan SX, Xie BB, Liu CF, Zhou JJ, Liu CY (2023) The spatial-temporal changes of supply-demand of ecosystem services and ecological compensation: a case study of Hexi Corridor, northwest China. Ecol Eng 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106861
Wen YL, Li HB, Zhang XL, Li TY (2022) Ecosystem services in Jiangsu Province: changes in the supply and demand patterns and its influencing factors. Front Environ Sci 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.931735
Wu X, Liu SL, Zhao S et al (2019) Quantification and driving force analysis of ecosystem services supply, demand and balance in China. Sci Total Environ 652:1375–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.329
Wu J, Guo X, Zhu Q et al (2022a) Threshold effects and supply-demand ratios should be considered in the mechanisms driving ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109281
Wu JY, Huang YT, Jiang WK (2022b) Spatial matching and value transfer assessment of ecosystem services supply and demand in urban agglomerations: a case study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in China. J Clean Prod 375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134081
Xiang HX, Zhang J, Mao DH, Wang ZM, Qiu ZQ, Yan HQ (2022) Identifying spatial similarities and mismatches between supply and demand of ecosystem services for sustainable northeast China. Ecol Indic 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108501
Xiao R, Lin M, Fei XF, Li YS, Zhang ZH, Meng QX (2020) Exploring the interactive coercing relationship between urbanization and ecosystem service value in the Shanghai-Hangzhou Bay Metropolitan region. J Clean Prod 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119803
Xin RH, Skov-Petersen H, Zeng J et al (2021) Identifying key areas of imbalanced supply and demand of ecosystem services at the urban agglomeration scale: a case study of the Fujian Delta in China. Sci Total Environ 791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148173
Xu BC, Pan JH (2022) Simulation and measurement of soil conservation service flow in the loess plateau: a case study for the Jinghe River Basin, northwestern China. Ecol Indic 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109072
Xu J, Xiao Y, Xie GD et al (2020) Interregional ecosystem services benefits transfer from wind erosion control measures in Inner Mongolia. Environ Dev 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100496
Xu J, Xiao Y, Xie GD et al (2021a) How to coordinate cross-regional water resource relationship by integrating water supply services flow and interregional ecological compensation. Ecol Indic 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107595
Xu J, Xiao Y, Xie GD, Wang YY, Lei GC (2021b) Assessment of the benefit diffusion of windbreak and sand fixation service in national key ecological function areas in China. Aeolian Res 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2021.100728
Yang MH, Zhao XN, Wu PT, Hu P, Gao XD (2022) Quantification and spatially explicit driving forces of the incoordination between ecosystem service supply and social demand at a regional scale. Ecol Indic 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108764
Yu HJ, Xie W, Sun L, Wang YT (2021) Identifying the regional disparities of ecosystem services from a supply-demand perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105557
Yuan YJ, Chen DX, Wu SH, Mo LJ, Tong GJ, Yan DH (2019) Urban sprawl decreases the value of ecosystem services and intensifies the supply scarcity of ecosystem services in China. Sci Total Environ 697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134170
Zhai TL, Wang J, Jin ZF, Qi Y, Fang Y, Liu JJ (2020) Did improvements of ecosystem services supply-demand imbalance change environmental spatial injustices?. Ecol Indic 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106068
Zhai TL, Zhang D, Zhao CC (2021) How to optimize ecological compensation to alleviate environmental injustice in different cities in the yellow river basin? A case of integrating ecosystem service supply, demand and flow. Sustain Cities Soc 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103341
Zhai TL, Chang MY, Ma YB, Huang LY, Li L (2023) Exploring the changes and driving mechanisms in the production-transport-consumption process of ecosystem services flow in the Yellow River basin under the background of policy changes. Ecol Indic 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110316
Zhang ZM, Peng J, Xu ZH, Wang XY, Meersmans J (2021) Ecosystem services supply and demand response to urbanization: a case study of the Pearl River Delta, China. Ecosyst Serv 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101274
Zhang XR, Wang YS, Yuan XF, Shao YJ, Bai Y (2022) Identifying ecosystem service supply-demand imbalance for sustainable land management in China’s loess plateau. Land Use Policy 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106423
Zhang JX, He CY, Huang QX, Li L (2023) Understanding ecosystem service flows through the metacoupling framework. Ecol Indic 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110303
Zhao X, Ma P, Li W, Yuxuan Du (2021) Spatiotemporal changes of supply and demand relationships of ecosystem services in the loess plateau. Acta Geogr Sin 76:2780–2796
Zhao JQ, Xiao Y, Sun SQ, Sang WG, Axmacher JC (2022) Does China’s increasing coupling of ‘urban population’ and ‘urban area’ growth indicators reflect a growing social and economic sustainability? J Environ Manag 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113932
Zhong H, Liu Z, Wang J (2022) Understanding impacts of cropland pattern dynamics on grain production in China: an integrated analysis by fusing statistical data and satellite-observed data. J Environ Manag 313:114988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114988
Zhu Q, Tran LT, Wang Y et al (2022) A framework of freshwater services flow model into assessment on water security and quantification of transboundary flow: a case study in northeast China. J Environ Manag 304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114318
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42171256).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yuhe Ma: conceptualization, methodology, data processing, writing — original draft, review and editing; Hai Chen: conceptualization, methodology, review and editing, supervision; Miaomiao Yang: conceptualization, methodology, review and editing, project administration; Jie Zhang: conceptualization, methodology; Jiayu Wang: methodology; Jiao Huang: review and editing. All authors have read and approved this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
All the authors consented to participate in the process of publication of the paper.
Consent for publication
All the authors consented to publish the findings of the study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Y., Chen, H., Yang, M. et al. Assessment of supply–demand relationships considering the interregional flow of ecosystem services. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 27710–27729 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32904-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32904-y