Abstract
The carbon mitigation response encompasses a variety of strategies aimed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions resulting from human activities. These measures are crafted to address the challenges posed by climate change and facilitate the transition of businesses towards a low-carbon paradigm. Leveraging the analytical outcomes of the extended STIRPAT model and the PSO-BP prediction model, this paper suggests countermeasures for reducing carbon emissions in China’s metal smelting industry. The overarching objective is to contribute to China’s attainment of the “dual carbon objectives.” The study identifies key factors influencing carbon emissions in the metal smelting industry, ranked in descending order of sensitivity: population, coal consumption, urbanization rate, total metal production, carbon intensity, proportion of secondary industry, and GDP per capita. Results from three established scenarios—namely, low carbon, standard, and high carbon—indicate a consistent decline in carbon emissions from China’s metal smelting industry over the next 15 years. This research not only enhances the findings of existing studies on carbon emissions in the metal smelting sector but also introduces an innovative approach to carbon emission reduction within China’s metal smelting industry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
References
Adebayo TS, Oladipupo SD, Rjoub H et al (2023) Asymmetric effect of structural change and renewable energy consumption on carbon emissions: designing an SDG framework for Turkey. Environ Dev Sustain 25:528–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02065-w
Ali HS, Sahoo M, Alam MM et al (2023) Structural transformations and conventional energy-based power utilization on carbon emissions: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Environ Dev Sustain 25:2419–2442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02133-9
Chen J, Chen Y, Mao B, Wang X, Peng L (2022) Key mitigation regions and strategies for CO 2 emission reduction in China based on STIRPAT and ARIMA models. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29(34):51537–51553
Chen Y, Pan Y, Wang M, Ding T, Zhou Z, Wang K (2023) How do industrial sectors contribute to carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals? A heterogeneous energy efficiency analysis for Beijing. Struct Change Econ Dyn 66:67–80
Cheng A, Han X, Jiang G (2023) Decomposition and scenario analysis of factors influencing carbon emissions: a case study of Jiangsu Province, China. Sustainability 15(6718):6718
Dai D, Li K, Zhao S, Zhou B (2022) Research on prediction and realization path of carbon peak of construction industry based on EGM-BP model. Front Energy Res 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.981097
Guangyue X, Wang Y, Rehman H (2023) The future trajectory of carbon emissions in the process of carbon neutrality in South Korea. J Environ Manag 345:118588
Guo F, Zhang L, Wang Z, Ji S (2022) Research on determining the critical influencing factors of carbon emission integrating GRA with an improved STIRPAT model: taking the Yangtze River Delta as an example. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(14):8791
Huang Y, Liu J, Shi M (2023) Analysis of influencing factors and prediction of carbon emissions of typical urban agglomerations in China: a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:52658–52678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26036-y
Huo Z, Zha X, Mengyao L, Ma T, Zhichao L (2023) Prediction of carbon emission of the transportation sector in Jiangsu Province-regression prediction model based on GA-SVM. Sustainability 15(3631):3631
Islam S, Rahaman SH (2023) The asymmetric effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in the context of an EKC framework in GCC countries: the role of energy consumption, energy intensity, trade, and financial development. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 30(31):77742
Khajavi H, Rastgoo A (2023) Predicting the carbon dioxide emission caused by road transport using a random forest (RF) model combined by meta-heuristic algorithms. Sustain Cities Soc 93:104503
Li C, Li Y, Xing J (2023a) Multivariate grey prediction model application in civil aviation carbon emission based on fractional order accumulation and background value optimization. Sustainability 15(9127):9127
Li R, Wang Q, Liu Y, Jiang R (2021) Per-capita carbon emissions in 147 countries: the effect of economic, energy, social, and trade structural changes. Sustain Prod Consump 27:1149–1164
Li Y, Zhou L, Gao P, Yang B, Han Y, Lian C (2022a) Short-term power generation forecasting of a photovoltaic plant based on PSO-BP and GA-BP neural networks. Front Energy Res 2022:9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.824691
Li Y, Dai J, Zhang S, Cui H (2023c) Dynamic prediction and driving factors of carbon emission in Beijing, China, under carbon neutrality targets. Atmosphere 14(798):798
Lv T, Hu H, Xie H et al (2023) An empirical relationship between urbanization and carbon emissions in an ecological civilization demonstration area of China based on the STIRPAT model. Environ Dev Sustain 25:2465–2486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02144-6
Mutascu M (2022) CO2 emissions in the USA: new insights based on ANN approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:68332–68356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20615-1
Nie W, Ao O, Duan H (2023) A novel grey prediction model with a feedforward neural network based on a carbon emission dynamic evolution system and its application. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:20704–20720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23541-4
Peng D, Liu H (2023) Measurement and driving factors of carbon emissions from coal consumption in China based on the Kaya-LMDI model. Energies 16(1):439
Pu X, Yao J, Zheng R (2022) Forecast of energy consumption and carbon emissions in China’s building sector to 2060. Energies 15(14):4950. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15144950
Qader MR, Khan S, Kamal M et al (2022) Forecasting carbon emissions due to electricity power generation in Bahrain. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:17346–17357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16960-2
Sixuan W, Zeng X, Li C, Cang H, Tan Q et al (2023) CO2 emission forecasting based on nonlinear grey Bernoulli and BP neural network combined model. Soft Comput 27(21):15509–15521
Sun J, Guo X, Wang Y et al (2022) Nexus among energy consumption structure, energy intensity, population density, urbanization, and carbon intensity: a heterogeneous panel evidence considering differences in electrification rates. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:19224–19243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17165-3
Sun Y, Huang Z, Chi F (2023) Analysis of systemic factors affecting carbon reduction in Chinese energy-intensive industries: a dual-driven DEMATEL model. Energy 285:129319
Verbič M, Satrovic E, Mujtaba A (2022) Assessing the driving factors of carbon dioxide and total greenhouse gas emissions to maintain environmental sustainability in Southeastern Europe. Int J Environ Res 16:105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-022-00486-7
Wang H, Li B, Khan MQ (2022d) Prediction of Shanghai Electric power carbon emissions based on improved STIRPAT model. Sustainability 14(20):13068. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013068
Wang Q, Zhang F, Li R (2023c) Free trade and carbon emissions revisited: the asymmetric impacts of trade diversification and trade openness. Sustain Dev:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2703
Wang Q, Ren F, Li R (2023a) Exploring the impact of geopolitics on the environmental Kuznets curve research[J]. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2743
Wang Q, Sun J, Pata UK, Li R, Kartal MT (2023b) Digital economy and carbon dioxide emissions: examining the role of threshold variables[J]. Geosci Front.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101644
Wang Q, Wang X, RongrongLi. (2022c) Does urbanization redefine the environmental Kuznets curve? An empirical analysis of 134 countries. Sustain Cities Soc 76:103382
Wang Q, Zhang F, Li R (2022b) Revisiting the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in 208 counties: the roles of trade openness, human capital, renewable energy and natural resource rent. Environ Res 216(3):114637
Wang X, Zhou Y, Bi Q, Cao Z, Wang B (2022e) Research on the low-carbon development path and policy options of China’s transportation under the background of dual carbon goals. Science 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.905037
Wen T, Liu Y, Yun He B, Liu H (2023) Modeling and forecasting CO2 emissions in China and its regions using a novel ARIMA-LSTM model. Heliyon 9(11):e21241
Xiao M, Xingzhi P (2023) Decomposition of carbon emission influencing factors and research on emission reduction performance of energy consumption in China. Front Environ Sci 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1096650
Xinfa T, Yifei S, Chenhui Z, Lihong W, Yan L (2023) Research on the promotion of digital teaching and learning toward achieving China’s dual-carbon strategy. Front Environ Sci 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.983526
Zhang C, Zou X, Lin C (2023) Carbon footprint prediction of thermal power industry under the dual-carbon target: a case study of Zhejiang Province, China. Sustainability 15:3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043280
Funding
This work was financially supported by the Science and Technology Research Project of Jiangxi Education Department (Project number: GJJ2201327).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Xinfa Tang: conceptualization and writing—review and editing, and supervision. LiuShuai: conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review, and editing, and resources. Wang Yonghua: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, and writing—review and editing. Wan Youwei: methodology, writing—original draft preparation, resources, and resources.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
All the participants in this study were recruited with available informed consent.
Consent for publication
All authors are informed and agree to the study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: V.V.S.S. Sarma
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, X., Liu, S., Wang, Y. et al. Study on carbon emission reduction countermeasures based on carbon emission influencing factors and trends. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 14003–14022 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-31962-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-31962-6