Skip to main content
Log in

A novel modeling method for evaluating the time-varying mesh stiffness of gears with pitting based on point cloud processing algorithm

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research on the time-varying meshing stiffness (TVMS) of gears provides a theoretical basis for the extraction of fault features. Pitting is a common tooth surface fault that has a significant effect on the TVMS. In this paper, a modeling method for evaluating the TVMS of gears with irregular-shaped pitting is proposed to replace the previous modeling methods by which pitting is reduced to simple geometry such as rectangles and cylinders. By the proposed method, the irregular-shaped pitting in analytical models can be matched with that of real objects and 3-D models in CAD software. Firstly, referring to the idea of reverse modeling in reverse engineering, the point cloud is used to map the real objects and 3-D models in CAD software to the analytical models. And a special point cloud processing algorithm is proposed to accurately calculate the TVMS. Then the coupling between multiple teeth with pitting is further investigated. The distribution and expansion of pitting are assumed to be 2-D normal distribution and random expansion. In addition, a complete system is established by taking into account of the gear body structure coupling effect, the nonlinear Hertzian contact stiffness, the accurate transition curve, and the tooth profile modification. Eventually, validation and discussion are conducted and it is demonstrated that the TVMS obtained by the proposed method is largely consistent with that calculated by the finite element method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27.
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun R-B, Yang Z-B, Yang L-D, Qiao B-J, Chen X-F, Gryllias K (2020) Planetary gearbox spectral modeling based on the hybrid method of dynamics and LSTM. Mech Syst Signal Process 138:106611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li X, Shao H, Lu S, Xiang J, Cai B (2022) Highly efficient fault diagnosis of rotating machinery under time-varying speeds using LSISMM and small infrared thermal images. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 52(12):7328–7340. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2022.3151185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu C, Shi W, Liu K (2022) Calculation method of mesh stiffness for helical gear pair with manufacturing errors, assembly errors and tooth modifications. Meccanica 57(3):541–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-022-01479-8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Parey A, Tandon N (2003) Spur gear dynamic models including defects: a review. Shock Vibr Dig 36(6):465–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/05831024030356002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marafona JDM, Marques PMT, Martins RC, Seabra JHO (2021) Mesh stiffness models for cylindrical gears: a detailed review. Mech Mach Theory 166:104472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feng M, Ma H, Li Z, Wang Q, Wen B (2017) An improved analytical method for calculating time-varying mesh stiffness of helical gears. Meccanica 53(4–5):1131–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0746-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Randall RB (1982) A new method of modeling gear faults. J Mech Des Trans ASME 104(2):259–267. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3256334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang W, Song Z, Zhang C, Wang J, Shi J, Jiang X, Zhu Z (2021) Multi-source fidelity sparse representation via convex optimization for gearbox compound fault diagnosis. J Sound Vib 496:115879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P.J. Blau, ASM Handbook, volume 18 – friction, lubrication, and wear technology, ASM International.

  10. Ding Y, Rieger NF (2003) Spalling formation mechanism for gears. Wear 254(12):1307–1317. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00126-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma H, Li Z, Feng M, Feng R, Wen B (2016) Time-varying mesh stiffness calculation of spur gears with spalling defect. Eng Fail Anal 66:166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.04.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang S, Zhu R (2020) An improved mesh stiffness calculation model of spur gear pair under mixed EHL friction with spalling effect. Vib Proced 33:176–181. https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2020.21671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Luo W, Qiao B, Shen Z, Yang Z, Chen X (2020) Time-varying mesh stiffness calculation of a planetary gear set with the spalling defect under sliding friction. Meccanica 55(1):245–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-01115-y

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Chaari F, Baccar W, Abbes MS, Haddar M (2008) Effect of spalling or tooth breakage on gearmesh stiffness and dynamic response of a one-stage spur gear transmission. Eur J Mech A Solids 27(4):691–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.11.005

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang X, Zhang H, Liu L, Zuo MJ (2016) The influence of tooth pitting on the mesh stiffness of a pair of external spur gears. Mech Mach Theory 106:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen T, Wang Y, Chen Z (2019) A novel distribution model of multiple teeth pits for evaluating time-varying mesh stiffness of external spur gears. Mech Syst Signal Process 129:479–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lei Y, Liu Z, Wang D, Yang X, Liu H, Lin J (2018) A probability distribution model of tooth pits for evaluating time-varying mesh stiffness of pitting gears. Mech Syst Signal Process 106:355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo Y, Baddour N, Han G, Jiang F, Liang M (2018) Evaluation of the time-varying mesh stiffness for gears with tooth spalls with curved-bottom features. Eng Fail Anal 92:430–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. AFd Rincon, F Viadero, M Iglesias, A de-Juan, P Garcia, R Sancibrian (2012) Effect of cracks and pitting defects on gear meshing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 226(11): 2805-2815.https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406212437104

  20. Ouyang T, Wang G, Cheng L, Wang J, Yang R (2022) Comprehensive diagnosis and analysis of spur gears with pitting-crack coupling faults. Mech Mach Theory 176:104968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meng Z, Wang F, Shi G (2021) A novel evolution model of pitting failure and effect on time -varying meshing stiffness of spur gears. Eng Fail Anal 120:105068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. El Yousfi B, Soualhi A, Medjaher K, Guillet F (2020) New approach for gear mesh stiffness evaluation of spur gears with surface defects. Eng Fail Anal 116:104740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meng F, Xia H, Zhang X, Wang J (2022) A new tooth pitting modeling method based on matrix equation for evaluating time-varying mesh stiffness. Eng Fail Anal 142:106799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan CK, Irving P, Mba D (2007) A comparative experimental study on the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of acoustics emission, vibration and spectrometric oil analysis for spur gears. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(1):208–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu W, Zhu R, Zhou W, Shang Y (2021) Probability distribution model of gear time-varying mesh stiffness with random pitting of tooth surface. Eng Fail Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang DCH, Lin JY (1987) Hertzian damping, tooth friction and bending elasticity in gear impact dynamics. J Mech Transm Autom Des 109(2):189–196. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3267437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dai H, Long X, Chen F, Xun C (2021) An improved analytical model for gear mesh stiffness calculation. Mech Mach Theory 159:104262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma H, Zeng J, Feng R, Pang X, Wen B (2016) An improved analytical method for mesh stiffness calculation of spur gears with tip relief. Mech Mach Theory 98:64–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ma H, Pang X, Feng R, Zeng J, Wen B (2015) Improved time-varying mesh stiffness model of cracked spur gears. Eng Fail Anal 55:271–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma H, Feng M, Li Z, Feng R, Wen B (2016) Time-varying mesh characteristics of a spur gear pair considering the tip-fillet and friction. Meccanica 52(7):1695–1709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0502-3

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Xie C, Hua L, Lan J, Han X, Wan X, Xiong X (2018) Improved analytical models for mesh stiffness and load sharing ratio of spur gears considering structure coupling effect. Mech Syst Signal Process 111:331–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.03.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xie C, Hua L, Han X, Lan J, Wan X, Xiong X (2018) Analytical formulas for gear body-induced tooth deflections of spur gears considering structure coupling effect. Int J Mech Sci 148:174–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen Z, Zhou Z, Zhai W, Wang K (2020) Improved analytical calculation model of spur gear mesh excitations with tooth profile deviations. Mech Mach Theory 149:103838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.103838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun Z, Chen S, Hu Z, Tao X (2022) Improved mesh stiffness calculation model of comprehensive modification gears considering actual manufacturing. Mech Mach Theory 167:104470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng X, Hu Y, He Z, Xiao Y, Zhang X (2022) On the extended tooth contact and nonlinear dynamics for spur gears—an analytical model. Mech Mach Theory 175:104958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tian XH (2004) Dynamic simulation for system response of gearbox including localized gear faults. University of Alberta, Edmonton, M.S.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang Y, Hu N, Tang J, Hu J, Zhang L, Cheng Z (2021) Dynamic analysis for a spur geared rotor system with tooth tip chipping based on an improved time-varying mesh stiffness model. Mech Mach Theory 165:104435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jiang H, Liu F (2019) Analytical models of mesh stiffness for cracked spur gears considering gear body deflection and dynamic simulation. Meccanica 54(11–12):1889–1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-01053-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Xinhua D, Yong M, Qiang, L (2013) Realization method of tooth root transition curve best linetype of involute gear. J Mech Transm 37(5):47–49

    Google Scholar 

  40. He R, Tenberge P, Xu X, Li H, Uelpenich R, Dong P, Wang S (2021) Study on the optimum standard parameters of hob optimization for reducing gear tooth root stress. Mech Mach Theory 156:104128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.104128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gao P, Liu H, Yan P, Xie Y, Xiang C, Wang C (2022) Research on application of dynamic optimization modification for an involute spur gear in a fixed-shaft gear transmission system. Mech Syst Sig Process 181:109530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Peng X, Zhou J (2022) Optimization design for dynamic characteristics of face gear drive with surface-active modification. Mech Mach Theory 176:105007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.105007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hashemian A, Hosseini SF (2018) An integrated fitting and fairing approach for object reconstruction using smooth NURBS curves and surfaces. Comput Math Appl 76(7):1555–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2018.07.007

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu L, Yan B, Wang Y, Dun Y, Ma J, Li C (2021) Inspection of blade profile and machining deviation analysis based on sample points optimization and NURBS knot insertion. Thin-Walled Struct 162:107540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gonzalez-Perez I, Fuentes-Aznar A (2022) Reverse engineering of spiral bevel gear drives reconstructed from point clouds. Mech Mach Theory 170:104694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Piegl L, Tiller W (1996) The NURBS book. Springer Science & Business Media

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Iman Zolanvari SM, Laefer DF (2016) Slicing Method for curved façade and window extraction from point clouds. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 119:334–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kassotakis N, Sarhosis V, Riveiro B, Conde B, D’Altri AM, Mills J, Milani G, de Miranda S, Castellazzi G (2020) Three-dimensional discrete element modelling of rubble masonry structures from dense point clouds. Autom Constr 119:103365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Xu Y, Zhang M, Yang S, Zheng B (2021) Measurement and qualification of welded I-column failure mode using laser scanning technique. Structures 34:2694–2707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 52075470, in part by the Central Government Guides Local Science and Technology Development Foundation under Grant 226Z2101G, in part by the High Level Personnel Funding Project of Hebei Province under Grant A202102001, in part by the Cultivation Project for Basic Research and Innovation of Yanshan University under Grant 2021LGZD006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fengjie Fan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, Z., Hao, G., Pang, X. et al. A novel modeling method for evaluating the time-varying mesh stiffness of gears with pitting based on point cloud processing algorithm. Meccanica 58, 1465–1494 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-023-01674-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-023-01674-1

Keywords

Navigation