Abstract
This research examines the perception of shill bidding in the online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending market by looking into the influence of existing large bids of a loan request (also known as a borrower listing) on the investment decisions of potential lenders who are interested in this listing. We use two panel data sets of funding dynamics of borrower listings from two separate P2P lending platforms, XLending.com in China and YLending.com in the US. We identify the anti-herding effect of large bids using within-loan variations in the amount received in each period, the lagged cumulative number of large bids, and other observable time-varying listing attributes. The analysis reveals that large bids of a listing have a negative impact on the listing’s funding from potential lenders (i.e., the anti-herding effect) both in China and in the U.S. The finding suggests that, when making bidding decisions, lenders in an online P2P lending market are influenced by the perception of Internet shillings. Our analyses also suggest that this anti-herding effect of large bids is moderated by the number of bids. Interestingly, the examination of the association between large bids and ex-post loan default reveals a negative association, indicating the credit signaling functionality of large bids. The evident disparity between the reality (credit signaling of large bids) and bidders’ perception (the presence of large bids perceived as the result of Internet Shilling) illustrates an amplifying erosive effect of dishonest actions on bidders’ trust in information cues from the lending platform.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Section 1041A, Corporations Act 2001.
Section 1(2)(a) Market Abuse Directive 2003.
References
Agrawal, A. K., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2011). The geography of crowfunding. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. No. 16820.
Barasinska, N. (2010) .Would Lehman Sisters have done it differently? An empirical analysis of gender differences in investment behavior. In AAAI Spring symposium on intelligent information privacy management. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Burtch, G., Ghose, A., & Wattal, S. (2014). Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online prosocial lending. MIS Quarterly, 38, 773–794.
Burtch, G., Ghose, A., & Wattal, S. (2013). An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowdfunded markets. Information Systems Research, 24, 499–519.
Chen, D., & Lin, Z. (2015). Rational or irrational herding in online microloan markets: Evidence from China. Social Science Research Network Working Paper. Available on http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2425047.
Chen, D. Y., Lai, F. J., & Lin, Z. X. (2014). A trust model for online peer-to-peer lending: A lender’s perspective. Information Technology and Management, 15, 239–254.
Chen, D. Y., Li, X. L., & Lai, F. J. (2017). Gender discrimination in online peer-to-peer credit lending: Evidence from a lending platform in China. Electronic Commerce Research, 17, 553–583.
Chen, D. Y., Lou, H., & Slyke, C. V. (2015). Toward an understanding of online lending intentions: Evidence from a survey in China. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 36, 317–336.
Du, N., Li, L., Lu, T., & Lu, X. (2019). Prosocial compliance in P2P lending: A natural field experiment. Management Science, 66, 315–333.
Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2009). Informational cascades and software adoption on the Internet: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 33, 23–48.
Duarte, J., Siegel, S., & Young, L. (2012). Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Review of Financial Studies, 25, 2455–2484.
Edmans, A. (2009). Blockholder trading, market efficiency, and managerial myopia. The Journal of Finance, 64, 2481–2513.
Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. (2004). Generation cohorts and personal values: A comparison of China and the United States. Organization Science, 15, 210–220.
Engelberg, J., & Williams, J. (2009). eBay’s proxy bidding: A license to shill. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 509–526.
Fang, H., Zhang, J., Bao, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2013). Towards effective online review systems in the Chinese context: A cross-cultural empirical study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12, 208–220.
Fischel, D., & Ross, D. (1991). Should the law prohibit manipulation in financial markets? Havard Law Review, 105, 503.
Gallagher, D. R., Gardener, P., & Swan, P. L. (2009). Portfolio pumping: An examination of investment manager quarter-end trading and impact on performance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17, 1–27.
Gao, Q., & Lin. M. F. (2015). Lemon or cherry: The value of texts in debt crowdfunding. Social Science Research Network Working Paper. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2446114.
Garbarino, E., Lerman, D., & Anne Lee, J. (2007). How cultural differences in uncertainty avoidance affect product perceptions. International Marketing Review, 24, 330–349.
Ge, R., Feng, J., Gu, B., & Zhang, P. (2017). Predicting and deterring default with social media information in peer-to-peer lending. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34, 401–424.
Greiner, M. E., & Wang, H. (2010). Building consumer-to-consumer trust in e-finance marketplaces: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 105–136.
Han, R. (2013). Adaptive persuasion in cyberspace: The ‘Fifty Cents Army’ in China. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association 2013 annual meeting. Chago, September 1, 2013.
Hanson, R., Oprea, R., & Porter, D. (2006). Information aggregation in an experimental market. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 449–459.
Herzenstein, M., Dholakia, U. M., & Andrews, R. L. (2011). Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25, 27–36.
Hofstede, G. H., & Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage Publications.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.
Jarrow, R. A. (1992). Market manipulation, bubbles, corners, and short squeezes. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 27, 311–336.
Jiang, C., Wang, Z., Wang, R., & Ding, Y. (2018). Loan default prediction by combining soft information extracted from descriptive text in online peer-to-peer lending. Annals of Operations Research, 266, 511–529.
Jones, A. J. (2000). Non-cooperative Games. In A. J. Jones (Ed.), Game theory. Woodhead Publishing, pp. 47–99.
Kahneman, D., & Riepe, M. (1998). Aspects of investor psychology. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 24, 52–62.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75, 424–440.
Kauffman, R. J., & Wood, C. A. (2005). The effects of shilling on final bid prices in online auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 4, 21–34.
Khwaja, A., & Mian, A. (2005). Unchecked intermediaries: Price manipulation in an emerging stock market. Journal of Financial Markets, 7, 237–270.
Kuksov, D., & Villas-Boas, M. J. (2008). Endogeneity and individual consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 702–714.
Ledgewood, S. D., & Carpenter, P. R. (2012). A framework for the analysis of market manipulation. The Review of Law and Economics, 8, 253–295.
Lee, E., & Lee, B. (2012). Herding behavior in online P2P lending: An empirical investigation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2012, 495–503.
Lin, M., & Viswanathan, S. (2015). Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Science, 62, 1225–1531.
Lin, M. F., Prabhala, N. R., & Viswanathan, S. (2013). Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Science, 59, 17–35.
Liu, D., Brass, D. J., Lu, Y., & Chen, D. Y. (2015). Friendships in online peer-to-peer lending: Pipes, prisms, and relational herding. MIS Quarterly, 39, 729–742.
Majadi, N., Trevathan, J., Gray, H., Estivill-Castro, V., & Bergmann, N. (2017). Real-time detection of shill bidding in online auctions: A literature review. Computer Science Review, 25, 1–18.
Nikitkov, A., & Bay, D. (2015). Shill bidding: Empirical evidence of its effectiveness and likelihood of detection in online auction systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 16, 42–54.
Paravisini, D., Rappoport, V., & Ravina, E. (2017). Risk aversion and wealth: Evidence from person-to-person lending portfolios. Management Science, 63, 279–297.
Putnins, T. J. (2012). Market manipulation: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26, 952–967.
Riley, J. G., & Samuelson, W. F. (1981). Optimal auctions. American Economic Review, 71, 381–392.
Shai, B., Korteweg, A., & Laws, K. (2017). Attracting early-stage investors: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Finance, 722, 509–538.
Shaw, J. B. (1990). A cognitive categorization model for the study of intercultural management. Academy of Management Review, 15, 626–645.
Simonsohn, U., & Ariely, D. (2008). When rational sellers face non-rational buyers: Evidence from herding on eBay. Management Science, 54, 1624–1637.
Stevens, B. J., Harlan, J., & Scibelli, D. B. (2013). The art of shill: Internet product consumption for savvy consumers. Issues in Information Systems, 14, 311–314.
Sydnor, J. R., & Pope, D. G. (2011). What’s a picture? Evidence of discriminations of loan fundability in the prosper.com marketplace. Journal of Human Resources, 46, 53–92.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
Xu, J., & Chau, M. (2018). Cheap talk? The impact of lender-borrower communication on P2P lending outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 53–85.
Xu, J., Chen, D. Y., & Chau, M. (2016). Identifying features for detecting fraudulent loan requests on P2P platforms. In IEEE international conference on intelligence and security informatics. Tucson, Arizona, USA, pp. 79–84.
Xu, J., Lu, Y., & Chau, M. (2015). P2P Lending fraud detection: A big data approach. In M. Chau, G. A. Wang & H. Chen (Eds.), Intelligence and security informatics. Springer International Publishing, pp. 71–81.
Xu, Y., Luo, C., Chen, D. Y., & Zheng, H. C. (2015). What influences the market outcome of online P2P lending marketplace? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Global Information Management, 23, 23–40.
Yum, H., Lee, B., & Chae, M. (2012). From the wisdom of crowds to my own judgment in microfinance through online peer-to-peer lending platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 469–483.
Zhang, J. J., & Liu, P. (2012). Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Science, 58, 892–912.
Acknowledgements
The work described in this study was supported by a Grant from the Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 71771159).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, D., Li, X. & Lai, F. Shill bidding in lenders’ eyes? A cross-country study on the influence of large bids in online P2P lending. Electron Commer Res 23, 1089–1114 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09503-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09503-x