Skip to main content
Log in

Impurity analyses for a certified reference material of high-purity sulfur dioxide gas (NMIJ CRM 3402)

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A certified reference material (CRM) of sulfur dioxide (SO2) gas, with a certified value of purity, was developed for the preparation of primary reference gas mixtures of SO2 in nitrogen (N2) gas. Impurity analyses by “subtraction method” were performed using a gas chromatograph (GC) with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD), a GC with a flame ionization detector (FID), and a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR), all calibrated with gas mixtures traceable to the Internal System of Units (SI). First, qualitative analysis using the FT-IR was performed on two samples of liquefied SO2 of different quality grades, contained in gas cylinders. Using the FT-IR and the GC-TCD, carbon dioxide (CO2) was detected in the lower- and higher-grade cylinders at approximately 0.5 cmol/mol and 5 µmol/mol, respectively. The FT-IR did not detect any sulfur compound peaks, other than SO2, in the higher-grade sample. Other atmospheric constituents such as N2, oxygen (O2), water (H2O), argon (Ar), and methane (CH4) were also tested for in this sample. The detection limit of H2O in the FT-IR was 49 µmol/mol, while those of N2, O2, Ar, by the GC-TCD were a few µmol/mol, and CH4, using the GC-FID, were better than 1 µmol/mol. The high detection limit of H2O was due to large baseline fluctuations when measuring the FT-IR spectrum of the SO2 gas. Responses corresponding to these analytes were not detected or were detected below the detection limits. For an estimation of purity by the subtraction method, each reported mol fraction was regarded as half the value of each detection limit, except for the CO2. The purity and its expanded uncertainty [k = 2] of the high-purity SO2 gas by the subtraction method were 99.9964% and 0.0028%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. ISO7935 (1992) Stationary source emissions—Determination of the mass concentration of sulfur dioxide — Performance characteristics of automated measuring methods, ISO Geneva

  2. Website of accreditation field of National Institute of Technology and Evaluation (NITE). https://www.nite.go.jp/en/iajapan/jcss/index.html. Accessed 17 Sep 2021

  3. ISO6142–1(2015) Gas analysis — Preparation of calibration gas mixtures — Part 1: Gravimetric method for Class I mixtures, ISO Geneva

  4. ISO Guide 35 (2017) Reference Materials – Guidance for characterization and assessment of homogeneity and stability, 3rd edn, ISO Geneva

  5. Matsumoto N, Watanabe T, Kato K (2013) J Chromatogr A 1282:1293–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimosaka T, Kato K (2013) Bunseki Kagaku 62:11–17 ([in Japanese])

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shimosaka T (2013) Bunseki Kagaku 62:1117–1124 ([in Japanese])

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawamura Y, Nakano T, Matsumoto N (2020) Metrologia 57:015004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumoto N, Watanabe T, Kato K (2006) Accred Qual Assur 11:199–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shelton RD, Nielsen AH, Fletcher WH (1953) J Chem Phys 21:2178–2183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ooki M, Osawa T, Tanaka M, Chihara H (ed) (1994) Dictionary of Chemistry, Tokyo Kagakudoujin, Tokyo [in Japanese]

  12. ISO 6143 (2001) Gas analysis - Comparison methods for determining and checking the composition of calibration gas mixtures ISO, Geneva

  13. Matsumoto N, Watanabe T, Maruyama M, Horimoto T, Maeda T, Kato K (2004) Metrologia 41:178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsumoto N, Watanabe T, Kato K (2005) Accred Qual Assur 10:382–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsumoto N, Shimosaka T, Watanabe T, Kato K (2008) Anal Bioanal Chem 391:2061–2069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmitt B (1994) Icarus 111:79–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Givan A, Loewenschuss A, Nielsen CJ, Rozenberg M (2007) J Molecular Structure 830:21–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Givan A, Larsen LA, Loewenschuss A, Nielsen CJ (1998) J Chem Soc Fara Trans 94:827–835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. F. Noguchi (NMIJ/AIST), Ms. Y. Sugai (NMIJ/AIST), and Ms. C. Nakata (NMIJ/AIST) for their help with the measurements. Part of the contents of this report was presented in the 17th Workshop of the APMP/TCQM Gas Analysis Working Group, Indonesia, August 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N. Matsumoto was the production manager of this CRM and K. Kato was the technical manager of this CRM.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuhiro Matsumoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsumoto, N., Kato, K. Impurity analyses for a certified reference material of high-purity sulfur dioxide gas (NMIJ CRM 3402). Accred Qual Assur 26, 229–236 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-021-01476-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-021-01476-6

Keywords

Navigation