Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Major complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion access: multicentric study by Italian S.O.L.A.S. group

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 October 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

The eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) approach has gained increasing importance in the last decade. This multicentric retrospective cohort study aims to assess the incidence of major complications in XLIF procedures performed by experienced surgeons and any relationship between the years of experience in XLIF procedures and the surgeon’s rate of severe complications.

Methods

Nine Italian members of the Society of Lateral Access Surgery (SOLAS) have taken part in this study. Each surgeon has declared how many major complications have been observed during his surgical experience and how they were managed. A major complication was defined as an injury that required reoperation, or as a complication, whose sequelae caused functional limitations to the patient after one year postoperatively. Each surgeon was finally asked about his years of experience in spine surgery and XLIF approach. Pearson correlation test was used to evaluate the association between the surgeon’s years of experience in XLIF and the rate of major complications; a p-value of last than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

We observed 14 major complications in 1813 XLIF procedures, performed in 1526 patients. The major complications rate was 0.7722%. Ten complications out of fourteen needed a second surgery. Neither cardiac nor respiratory nor renal complications were observed. No significant correlation was found between the surgeon's years of experience in the XLIF procedure and the number of major complications observed.

Conclusion

XLIF revealed a safe and reliable surgical procedure, with a very low rate of major complications, when performed by an expert spine surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Walker CT, Farber SH, Cole TS et al (2019) Complications for minimally invasive lateral interbody arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing prepsoas and transpsoas approaches. J Neurosurg Spine 30:446–460. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berjano P, Balsano M, Buric J et al (2012) Direct lateral access lumbar and thoracolumbar fusion: preliminary results. Eur Spine J 21:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2217-z

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Formica M, Berjano P, Cavagnaro L et al (2014) Extreme lateral approach to the spine in degenerative and post traumatic lumbar diseases: selection process, results and complications. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 6):684–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3545-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berjano P, Damilano M, Lamartina C (2012) Sagittal alignment correction and reconstruction of lumbar post-traumatic kyphosis via MIS lateral approach. Eur Spine J 21:2718–2720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2568-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Berjano P, Damilano M, Ismael M et al (2015) Anterior column realignment (ACR) technique for correction of sagittal imbalance. Eur Spine J 24:451–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3962-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berjano P, Lamartina C (2013) Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:242–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2426-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Costanzo G, Zoccali C, Maykowski P et al (2014) The role of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion in sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 23:699–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3561-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khajavi K, Shen A, Hutchison A (2015) Substantial clinical benefit of minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 24:314–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3841-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berjano P, Langella F, Damilano M et al (2015) Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 24:369–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3929-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berjano P, Lamartina C (2011) Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach with advanced neurophysiologic monitoring for lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20:1584–1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1997-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sofianos DA, Briseño MR, Abrams J, Patel AA (2012) Complications of the lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody arthrodesis: a case series and literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1621–1632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2088-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Formica M, Berjano P, Cavagnaro L et al (2014) Extreme lateral approach to the spine in degenerative and post traumatic lumbar diseases: selection process, results and complications. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3545-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kueper J, Fantini GA, Walker BR et al (2015) Incidence of vascular complications during lateral lumbar interbody fusion: an examination of the mini-open access technique. Eur Spine J 24:800–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3796-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tempel ZJ, Gandhoke GS, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS (2015) Impaired bone mineral density as a predictor of graft subsidence following minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 24:414–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3844-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tempel ZJ, Gandhoke GS, Bolinger BD et al (2015) Vertebral body fracture following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF): report of two events out of 712 levels. Eur Spine J 24:409–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3845-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J (2011) Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Spine 36:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e1040a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA et al (2010) Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion. Spine 35:S302–S311. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182023438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Balsano M, Carlucci S, Ose M, Boriani L (2015) A case report of a rare complication of bowel perforation in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 24:405–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3881-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Buric J, Bombardieri D (2016) Direct lesion and repair of a common iliac vein during XLIF approach. Eur Spine J 25:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4134-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruf M, Voigt A, Kupczyk-Joeris D, Merk HR (2011) Perforation of the sigmoid colon due to intradiscal spacer dislocation. Eur Spine J 20:289–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1696-7

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Billinghurst J, Akbarnia BA (2009) Extreme lateral interbody fusion-XLIF. Curr Orthop Pract 20:238–251. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0b013e3181a32ead

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Joseph JR, Smith BW, La Marca F, Park P (2015) Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 39:E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hartl R, Joeris A, McGuire RA (2016) Comparison of the safety outcomes between two surgical approaches for anterior lumbar fusion surgery: anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and extreme lateral interbody fusion (ELIF). Eur Spine J 25:1484–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4407-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Daly D, Rao PJ, Lennox A (2016) Approach-related complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: results of a combined spine and vascular surgical team. Global Spine J 6(2):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No funds

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Berjano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piazzolla, A., Bizzoca, D., Berjano, P. et al. Major complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion access: multicentric study by Italian S.O.L.A.S. group. Eur Spine J 30, 208–216 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06542-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06542-0

Keywords

Navigation