Abstract
Purpose
The eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) approach has gained increasing importance in the last decade. This multicentric retrospective cohort study aims to assess the incidence of major complications in XLIF procedures performed by experienced surgeons and any relationship between the years of experience in XLIF procedures and the surgeon’s rate of severe complications.
Methods
Nine Italian members of the Society of Lateral Access Surgery (SOLAS) have taken part in this study. Each surgeon has declared how many major complications have been observed during his surgical experience and how they were managed. A major complication was defined as an injury that required reoperation, or as a complication, whose sequelae caused functional limitations to the patient after one year postoperatively. Each surgeon was finally asked about his years of experience in spine surgery and XLIF approach. Pearson correlation test was used to evaluate the association between the surgeon’s years of experience in XLIF and the rate of major complications; a p-value of last than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
We observed 14 major complications in 1813 XLIF procedures, performed in 1526 patients. The major complications rate was 0.7722%. Ten complications out of fourteen needed a second surgery. Neither cardiac nor respiratory nor renal complications were observed. No significant correlation was found between the surgeon's years of experience in the XLIF procedure and the number of major complications observed.
Conclusion
XLIF revealed a safe and reliable surgical procedure, with a very low rate of major complications, when performed by an expert spine surgeon.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
08 February 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06614-1
References
Walker CT, Farber SH, Cole TS et al (2019) Complications for minimally invasive lateral interbody arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing prepsoas and transpsoas approaches. J Neurosurg Spine 30:446–460. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18800
Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012
Berjano P, Balsano M, Buric J et al (2012) Direct lateral access lumbar and thoracolumbar fusion: preliminary results. Eur Spine J 21:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2217-z
Formica M, Berjano P, Cavagnaro L et al (2014) Extreme lateral approach to the spine in degenerative and post traumatic lumbar diseases: selection process, results and complications. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 6):684–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3545-y
Berjano P, Damilano M, Lamartina C (2012) Sagittal alignment correction and reconstruction of lumbar post-traumatic kyphosis via MIS lateral approach. Eur Spine J 21:2718–2720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2568-5
Berjano P, Damilano M, Ismael M et al (2015) Anterior column realignment (ACR) technique for correction of sagittal imbalance. Eur Spine J 24:451–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3962-6
Berjano P, Lamartina C (2013) Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:242–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2426-5
Costanzo G, Zoccali C, Maykowski P et al (2014) The role of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion in sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 23:699–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3561-y
Khajavi K, Shen A, Hutchison A (2015) Substantial clinical benefit of minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 24:314–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3841-1
Berjano P, Langella F, Damilano M et al (2015) Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 24:369–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3929-7
Berjano P, Lamartina C (2011) Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach with advanced neurophysiologic monitoring for lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20:1584–1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1997-x
Sofianos DA, Briseño MR, Abrams J, Patel AA (2012) Complications of the lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody arthrodesis: a case series and literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1621–1632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2088-3
Formica M, Berjano P, Cavagnaro L et al (2014) Extreme lateral approach to the spine in degenerative and post traumatic lumbar diseases: selection process, results and complications. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3545-y
Kueper J, Fantini GA, Walker BR et al (2015) Incidence of vascular complications during lateral lumbar interbody fusion: an examination of the mini-open access technique. Eur Spine J 24:800–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3796-2
Tempel ZJ, Gandhoke GS, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS (2015) Impaired bone mineral density as a predictor of graft subsidence following minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 24:414–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3844-y
Tempel ZJ, Gandhoke GS, Bolinger BD et al (2015) Vertebral body fracture following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF): report of two events out of 712 levels. Eur Spine J 24:409–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3845-x
Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J (2011) Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Spine 36:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e1040a
Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA et al (2010) Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion. Spine 35:S302–S311. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182023438
Balsano M, Carlucci S, Ose M, Boriani L (2015) A case report of a rare complication of bowel perforation in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 24:405–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3881-6
Buric J, Bombardieri D (2016) Direct lesion and repair of a common iliac vein during XLIF approach. Eur Spine J 25:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4134-4
Ruf M, Voigt A, Kupczyk-Joeris D, Merk HR (2011) Perforation of the sigmoid colon due to intradiscal spacer dislocation. Eur Spine J 20:289–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1696-7
Billinghurst J, Akbarnia BA (2009) Extreme lateral interbody fusion-XLIF. Curr Orthop Pract 20:238–251. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0b013e3181a32ead
Joseph JR, Smith BW, La Marca F, Park P (2015) Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 39:E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15278
Hartl R, Joeris A, McGuire RA (2016) Comparison of the safety outcomes between two surgical approaches for anterior lumbar fusion surgery: anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and extreme lateral interbody fusion (ELIF). Eur Spine J 25:1484–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4407-6
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Daly D, Rao PJ, Lennox A (2016) Approach-related complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: results of a combined spine and vascular surgical team. Global Spine J 6(2):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557141
Acknowledgements
No funds
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piazzolla, A., Bizzoca, D., Berjano, P. et al. Major complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion access: multicentric study by Italian S.O.L.A.S. group. Eur Spine J 30, 208–216 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06542-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06542-0