Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extreme lateral approach to the spine in degenerative and post traumatic lumbar diseases: selection process, results and complications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of the study

The aim of this study is to describe clinical and radiological outcomes as well as accompanying complications in a series of consecutive lateral transpsoas approaches (XLIF).

Materials and methods

A retrospective study of 39 patients treated for degenerative and post-traumatic lumbar diseases was carried out. Functional status, leg and back pain and radiological outcomes were evaluated pre and post-operatively using the Oswestry disability index score (ODI) visual analog scales (VAS) and X-ray studies.

Results

Mean follow-up was 16 months (range 12–24 months). Mean improvement in back and leg pain on VAS was 6.08 (p < 0.01) and 2.77 (p < 0.01), respectively. Mean improvement in the ODI score was 38 (p < 0.01). Increases in lumbar lordosis (32.8°–39.2°, p < 0.05) and disc height (3.6–4.8 mm, p < 0.05) were noted in the post-operative. Mild, transient strength deficit of the quadriceps muscle was also noted in ten cases with complete regression.

Conclusions

XLIF proved to be a safe, effective, minimally invasive technique that allows valid arthrodesis to be carried out. Patients achieved positive clinical outcomes and satisfactory fusion rates, with sustained restoration of lordosis, spinal alignment and disc height.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pimenta L (2001) Lateral endoscopic transpsoas retroperitoneal approach for lumbar spine surgery. Paper presented at the VIII Brazilian Pine Society Meeting, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, May 2001

  2. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 6:435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Billinghurst J, Akbarnia BA (2009) Extreme lateral interbody fusion–XLIF. Curr Orthop Pract 20(3):238–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sasso RC, Best NM, Mummaneni PV et al (2005) Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Spine 30:670–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brau SA, Delamarter RB, Schiffman ML, Williams LA, Watkins RG (2004) Vascular injury during anterior lumbar surgery. Spine J 4:409–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tiusanen H, Seitsalo S, Osterman K et al (1995) Retrograde ejaculation after anterior interbody lumbar fusion. Euro Spine J 4:339–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Isiklar ZU, Lindsey RW, Coburn M (1996) Ureteral injury after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. A case report. Spine 21:2379–2382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P, Heary RF, Conklin L, Jacobs GB (1999) Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg 91(1 Suppl):60–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sofianos DA, Briseno MR, Abrams J, Patel AA (2012) Complications of the lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1621–1632

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, Kim JH, Kim SS, Choi WK, Lee KY, Lee SR (2007) Complications in posterior fusion and instrumentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2232–2237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Scaduto AA, Gamradt SC, Yu WD, Huang J, Delamarter RB, Wang JC (2003) Perioperative complications of threaded cylindrical lumbar interbody fusion devices: anterior versus posterior approach. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:502–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DiPaola CP, Molinari RW (2008) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:130–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel VC, Park DK, Herkowitz HN (2012) Lateral transpsoas fusion: indications and outcomes. Sci World J. doi:10.1100/2012/893608

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berjano P, Lamartina C (2011) Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach with advanced neurophysiologic monitoring for lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20:1584–1586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berjano P, Lamartina C (2013) Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):S242–S253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS (2010) Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus 28:E7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pimenta L, Oliveira L, Schaffa T, Coutinho E, Marchi L (2011) Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 14:38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Malham GM, Ellis NJ, Parker RM, Seex KA (2012) Clinical outcome and fusion rates after the first 30 extreme lateral interbody fusions. Sci World J 2012:246989. doi:10.1100/2012/246989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meredith DS, Kepler CK, Huamg RC, Hegde VV (2013) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine: technical report and early outcomes. HSSJ 9:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ (2007) Experience and early results with a minimally invasive technique for anterior column support through extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF). US Musculoskel Rev 2:28–32

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ (2010) Early complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the obese. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:393–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J (2011) Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA et al (2010) Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:S302–S311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Uribe JS, Dakwar E, Le TV, Christian G, Serrano S, Smith WD (2010) Minimally invasive surgery treatment for thoracic spine tumor removal: a mini-open, lateral approach. Spine (Phila Pa1976) 35:S347–S354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith WD, Dakwar E, Le TV, Christian G, Serrano S, Uribe JS (2010) Minimally invasive surgery for traumatic spinal pathologies: a mini-open, lateral approach in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:S338–S346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tohmeh AG, Rodgers WB, Peterson MD (2011) Dynamically evoked, discrete-threshold electromyography in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach. J Neurosurg Spine 14:31–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Uribe JS, Vale FL, Dakwar E (2010) Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:S368–S374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL (2010) Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine 13:260–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Huntoon M et al (1997) Location of the extraforaminal lumbar nerve roots. An anatomic study. Clin Orthop 340:230–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gu Y, Ebraheim NA, Xu R et al (2001) Anatomic considerations of the posterolateral lumbar disk region. Orthopedics 24:56–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cummock MD, Vanni S, Levi AD et al (2011) An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 15:11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Cavagnaro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Formica, M., Berjano, P., Cavagnaro, L. et al. Extreme lateral approach to the spine in degenerative and post traumatic lumbar diseases: selection process, results and complications. Eur Spine J 23 (Suppl 6), 684–692 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3545-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3545-y

Keywords

Navigation