Skip to main content
Log in

Goal-directed fluid therapy during post-resection phase in low central venous pressure assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy: a randomized controlled superiority trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this prospective single blinded randomized controlled trial was to find out whether goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) strategy in post-transection period in low central venous pressure (CVP) assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has more benefit than traditional fluid strategy.

Methods

Between April 2020 and Dec 2021, patients who were scheduled for laparoscopic liver resection surgery were eligible to participate in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: control group that received traditional fluid strategy in post-transection period in low CVP assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy and GDFT strategy group that received GDFT strategy in post-transection period. The primary outcome parameter is the incidence of postoperative complications. Secondary outcome parameters include perioperative clinical outcomes, postoperative clinical outcomes, length of hospital stay after surgery, postoperative lactic acid, fluids and vasoactive medications during the operation.

Results

A total of 159 patients in the control group and 160 patients in the GDFT were included. Two groups had no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications including pneumonia (P = 0.34), acute kidney injury (P = 0.72), hepatic insufficiency (P = 0.25), pleural effusion (P = 0.08) and seroperitoneum (P = 1.00), respectively. The amount of perioperative urine output is fewer in GDFT group than in the control group (P = 0.0354), while other perioperative variables and postoperative variables were comparable between two groups.

Conclusions

The results show the implementation of GDFT strategy is not associated with fewer postoperative complications. GDFT strategy did not result in improved outcomes in low CVP-assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the fndings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, YH.

References

  1. Dutta R, Mahato RI. Recent advances in hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;173:106–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(4):1203–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rhu J, Kim SJ, Choi GS, Kim JM, Joh JW, Kwon CHD. Laparoscopic versus open right posterior sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in a high-volume center: a propensity score matched analysis. World J Surg. 2018;42(9):2930–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pan YX, Wang JC, Lu XY, Chen JB, He W, Chen JC, Wang XH, Fu YZ, Xu L, Zhang YJ, Chen MS, Lai RC, Zhou ZG. Intention to control low central venous pressure reduced blood loss during laparoscopic hepatectomy: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Surgery. 2020;167(6):933–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mise Y, Sakamoto Y, Ishizawa T, Kaneko J, Aoki T, Hasegawa K, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N. A worldwide survey of the current daily practice in liver surgery. Liver Cancer. 2013;2(1):55–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Correa-Gallego C, Berman A, Denis SC, Langdon-Embry L, O’Connor D, Arslan-Carlon V, Kingham TP, D’Angelica MI, Allen PJ, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Jarnagin WR, Melendez J, Fischer M. Renal function after low central venous pressure-assisted liver resection: assessment of 2116 cases. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(3):258–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vallet B, Blanloeil Y, Cholley B, Orliaguet G, Pierre S, Tavernier B, Socie te franc aise d’anesthe sie et de re a. Guidelines for perioperative haemodynamic optimization. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2013;32(10):e151–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Michard F, Giglio MT, Brienza N. Perioperative goal-directed therapy with uncalibrated pulse contour methods: impact on fluid management and postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(1):22–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giustiniano E, Procopio F, Ruggieri N, Grimaldi S, Torzilli G, Raimondi F. Impact of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ monitoring on intraoperative fluid management and outcome after liver resection. Dig Surg. 2018;35(5):435–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor J. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2506–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T, Aihara A, Hasegawa K, Gotohda N, Hatano E, Tanahashi Y, Mizuguchi T, Kamiyama T, Ikeda T, Tanaka S, Taniai N, Baba H, Tanabe M, Kokudo N, Konishi M, Uemoto S, Sugioka A, Hirata K, Taketomi A, Maehara Y, Kubo S, Uchida E, Miyata H, Nakamura M, Kaneko H, Yamaue H, Miyazaki M, Takada T. Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22(10):721–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):831–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Xie SM, Xiong JJ, Liu XT, Chen HY, Iglesia-Garcia D, Altaf K, Bharucha S, Huang W, Nunes QM, Szatmary P, Liu XB. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fretland AA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjornelv GMW, Kazaryan AM, Kristiansen R, Fagerland MW, Hausken J, Tonnessen TI, Abildgaard A, Barkhatov L, Yaqub S, Rosok BI, Bjornbeth BA, Andersen MH, Flatmark K, Aas E, Edwin B. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2018;267(2):199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mizunoya K, Fujii T, Yamamoto M, Tanaka N, Morimoto Y. Two-stage goal-directed therapy protocol for non-donor open hepatectomy: an interventional before-after study. J Anesth. 2019;33(6):656–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weinberg L, Ianno D, Churilov L, McGuigan S, Mackley L, Banting J, Shen SH, Riedel B, Nikfarjam M, Christophi C. Goal directed fluid therapy for major liver resection: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019;45:45–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinberg L, Mackley L, Ho A, McGuigan S, Ianno D, Yii M, Banting J, Muralidharan V, Tan CO, Nikfarjam M, Christophi C. Impact of a goal directed fluid therapy algorithm on postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing open right hepatectomy: a single centre retrospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Cain PA, Ahl R, Hedstrom E, Ugander M, Allansdotter-Johnsson A, Friberg P, Arheden H. Age and gender specific normal values of left ventricular mass, volume and function for gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging: a cross sectional study. BMC Med Imaging. 2009;9:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Correa-Gallego C, Tan KS, Arslan-Carlon V, Gonen M, Denis SC, Langdon-Embry L, Grant F, Kingham TP, DeMatteo RP, Allen PJ, D’Angelica MI, Jarnagin WR, Fischer M. Goal-directed fluid therapy using stroke volume variation for resuscitation after low central venous pressure-assisted liver resection: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(2):591–601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. de Waal EEC, Frank M, Scheeren TWL, Kaufmann T, de Korte-de BD, Cox B, van Kuijk SMJ, Montenij LM, Buhre W. Perioperative goal-directed therapy in high-risk abdominal surgery. A multicenter randomized controlled superiority trial. J Clin Anesth. 2021;75:110506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty (Grant number: shslczdzk03603) and Edward (Shanghai) Medical Supplies Co., Ltd (Grant number: 2017-ji-27) to Jing Cang.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: JC, HY, SL; administrative support: JC; provision of study materials or patients: HY, SL, YY; collection and assembly of data: YY, PW, LJ; data analysis and interpretation: SL, HY; manuscript writing: all authors; final approval of manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Huan Yan or Jing Cang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Jing Cang received research support from Edward (Shanghai) Medical Supplies Co., Ltd. Shichao Li, Yue Yin, Pei Wang, Long Jiang and Huan Yan declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical statement

This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University (Approval No.: B2018-303R). The study has been registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn) and the registration number is ChiCTR1900027017. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The research is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Yin, Y., Wang, P. et al. Goal-directed fluid therapy during post-resection phase in low central venous pressure assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy: a randomized controlled superiority trial. J Anesth 38, 77–85 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03282-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03282-5

Keywords

Navigation