Abstract
Objectives
Catheter-based angiography is the reference-standard to establish coronary anatomy. While routinely employed clinically, lumen assessment correlates poorly with physiological measures of ischaemia. Moreover, functional studies to identify and localise ischaemia before elective angiography are often not available. This article reviews fractional flow reserve (FFR) and its role in guiding patient management for patients with a potentially haemodynamic significant coronary lesion.
Methods
This review discusses the theory, evidence, indications, and limitations of FFR. Also included are emerging non-invasive imaging FFR surrogates currently under evaluation for accuracy with respect to standard FFR.
Results
Coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) rapidly assesses the haemodynamic significance of individual coronary artery lesions and can readily be performed in the catheterisation laboratory. The use of FFR has been shown to effectively guide coronary revascularization procedures leading to improved patient outcomes.
Conclusions
FFR is an invaluable modality in guiding coronary disease treatment decisions. It is safe, cost-effective and leads to improved patient outcomes. Non-invasive imaging modalities to assess the physiologic significance of CAD are currently being developed and evaluated.
Key points
• Coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an important adjunct to angiography.
• FFR is an invaluable technique in guiding coronary disease treatment decisions.
• FFR is safe, cost-effective and leads to improved patient outcomes.
• New directions include CT-based non-invasive conventional FFR surrogates for functional lesion significance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC et al (2009) 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update). Circulation 120:2271–2306
King SB, Smith SC, Hirshfeld JW et al (2008) 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation 117:261–295
Lin GA, Dudley RA, Lucas FL, Malenka DJ, Vittinghoff E, Redberg RF (2008) Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 300:1765–1773
Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Rybicki FJ (2009) The “post-64” era of coronary CT angiography: understanding new technology from physical principles. Radiol Clin N Am 47:79–90
Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW (1976) Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 53:627–632
Keane D, Haase J, Slager CJ et al (1995) Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Circulation 91:2174–2183
Arbab-Zadeh A, Texter J, Ostbye KM et al (2010) Quantification of lumen stenoses with known dimensions by conventional angiography and computed tomography: implications of using conventional angiography as gold standard. Heart 96:1358–1363
Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213–224
Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N et al (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 31:2501–2555
Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P et al (1995) Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 92:3183–3193
Pantely G, Ladley H, Bristow J (1984) Low zero-flow pressure and minimal capacitance effect on diastolic coronary arterial pressure-flow relationships during maximum vasodilation in swine. Circulation 70:485–494
de Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Pijls NHJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W (1996) Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation 94:1842–1849
Fearon WF, Aarnoudse W, Pijls NH et al (2004) Microvascular resistance is not influenced by epicardial coronary artery stenosis severity: experimental validation. Circulation 109:2269–2272
Parham WA, Bouhasin A, Ciaramita JP, Khoukaz S, Herrmann SC, Kern MJ (2004) Coronary hyperemic dose responses of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside. Circulation 109:1236–1243
Kern MJ, Lerman A, Bech J-W et al (2006) Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circulation 114:1321–1341
Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K et al (1996) Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 334:1703–1708
Wongpraparut N, Yalamanchili V, Pasnoori V et al (2005) Thirty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versus conventional multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 96:877–884
Legalery P, Schiele F, Seronde MF et al (2005) One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J 26:2623–2629
Bech GJW, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ et al (2001) Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis. Circulation 103:2928–2934
Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G et al (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2105–2111
Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA et al (2010) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:177–184
Fearon WF, Bornschein B, Tonino PAL et al (2010) Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve–guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease/clinical perspective. Circulation 122:2545–2550
Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK et al (2007) Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 356:1503–1516
Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ et al (2008) Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 117:1283–1291
Kern MJ, Samady H (2010) Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:173–185
Samady H, Lepper W, Powers ER et al (2006) Fractional flow reserve of infarct-related arteries identifies reversible defects on noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging early after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2187–2193
de Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Bartunek J et al (2001) Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation 104:157–162
Ntalianis A, Sels JW, Davidavicius G et al (2010) Fractional flow reserve for the assessment of nonculprit coronary artery stenoses in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:1274–1281
Kern MJ (2012) Conversations in cardiology: using new media to transmit timely medical knowledge. How do you assess the left main stenosis with FFR and IVUS in a patient with multivessel CAD? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:465-471
Ciaramita JP, Parham WA, Herrmann S, Khoukaz S, Kern MJ (2004) The influence of obstructive sleep apnea on FFR measurements for coronary lesion assessment. J Interv Cardiol 17:331–337
Perera D, Biggart S, Postema P et al (2004) Right atrial pressure: can it be ignored when calculating fractional flow reserve and collateral flow index? J Am Coll Cardiol 44:2089–2091
Claessens TE, Van Herck PL, Matthys KS, Segers P, Vrints CJ, Verdonck PR (2004) Influence of zero flow pressure on fractional flow reserve. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 3:48–55
Ladenheim ML, Pollock BH, Rozanski A et al (1986) Extent and severity of myocardial hypoperfusion as predictors of prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:464–471
Leslie WD, Tully SA, Yogendran MS, Ward LM, Nour KA, Metge CJ (2005) Prognostic value of automated quantification of 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med 46:204–211
Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ et al (1998) Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 97:535–543
Hodgson JM (2010) If you want to stent … do intravascular ultrasound! JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:818–820
Nishioka T, Amanullah AM, Luo H et al (1999) Clinical validation of intravascular ultrasound imaging for assessment of coronary stenosis severity: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1870–1878
Kumamaru KK, Hoppel BE, Mather RT, Rybicki FJ (2010) CT angiography: current technology and clinical use. Radiol Clin N Am 48:213–235, vii
Ramkumar PG, Mitsouras D, Feldman CL, Stone PH, Rybicki FJ (2009) New advances in cardiac computed tomography. Curr Opin Cardiol 24:596–603
Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324–2336
de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. Investig Radiol 45:331–340
Rist C, von Ziegler F, Nikolaou K et al (2006) Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. Acad Radiol 13:1465–1473
Hang C-L, Lee Y-W, Guo GB-F et al (2011) Evaluation of coronary artery stent patency by using 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography and conventional coronary angiography: a comparison with intravascular ultrasonography. Int J Cardiol
Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:636–643
George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Cerci RJ et al (2011) Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-MDCT: the CT angiography and perfusion methods of the CORE320 Multicenter Multinational Diagnostic Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:829–837
Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535–546
Hacker M, Rieber J, Schmid R et al (2005) Comparison of Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT with fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenoses. J Nucl Cardiol 12:645–654
Rieber J, Jung P, Erhard I et al (2004) Comparison of pressure measurement, dobutamine contrast stress echocardiography and SPECT for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenoses. The COMPRESS trial. Int J Cardiovasc Interv 6:142–147
Chamuleau SAJ, Meuwissen M, van Eck-Smit BLF et al (2001) Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestambi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1316–1322
Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P et al (2010) Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:307–314
Rodes-Cabau J, Candell-Riera J, Angel J et al (2005) Relation of myocardial perfusion defects and nonsignificant coronary lesions by angiography with insights from intravascular ultrasound and coronary pressure measurements. Am J Cardiol 96:1621–1626
Tani S, Watanabe I, Kobari C et al (2004) Mismatch between results of myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements and myocardial perfusion SPECT for identification of the severity of ischemia: pitfall of FFR in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Jpn Heart J 45:867–872
Bourque JM, Beller GA (2011) Stress myocardial perfusion imaging for assessing prognosis: an update. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:1305–1319
Jimenez-Navarro M, Alonso-Briales JH, Hernandez Garcia MJ, Rodriguez Bailon I, Gomez-Doblas JJ, de Teresa Galvan E (2001) Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess moderately severe coronary lesions: correlation with dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Interv Cardiol 14:499–504
Bartunek J, Marwick TH, Rodrigues ACT et al (1996) Dobutamine-induced wall motion abnormalities: correlations with myocardial fractional flow reserve and quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:1429–1436
Watkins S, McGeoch R, Lyne J et al (2009) Validation of magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary heart disease. Circulation 120:2207–2213
Jogiya R, Kozerke S, Morton G et al (2012) Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:756–765
Manka R, Paetsch I, Kozerke S et al (2012) Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location. Eur Hear J 33:2016–2024
Costa MA, Shoemaker S, Futamatsu H et al (2007) Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:514–522
Steigner ML, Otero HJ, Cai T et al (2009) Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:85–90
Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:117–121
Lockie T, Ishida M, Perera D et al (2011) High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:70–75
Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 248:466–475
Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS et al (2009) Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1072–1084
George RT (2009) Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: developmental points of emphasis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 7:99–101
George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM et al (2009) Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:174–182
Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ et al (2006) Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 113:823–833
Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 113:394–404
Chow BJ, Kass M, Gagne O et al (2011) Can differences in corrected coronary opacification measured with computed tomography predict resting coronary artery flow? J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1280–1288
Choi JH, Min JK, Labounty TM et al (2011) Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:1149–1157
Steigner ML, Mitsouras D, Whitmore AG et al (2010) Iodinated contrast opacification gradients in normal coronary arteries imaged with prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3:179–186
Davies PF, Shi C, Depaola N, Helmke BP, Polacek DC (2001) Hemodynamics and the focal origin of atherosclerosis: a spatial approach to endothelial structure, gene expression, and function. Ann N Y Acad Sci 947:7–16, discussion 16–17
Rybicki F, Melchionna S, Mitsouras D et al (2009) Prediction of coronary artery plaque progression and potential rupture from 320-detector row prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat CT angiography: Lattice Boltzmann evaluation of endothelial shear stress. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:289–299
van der Giessen AG, Schaap M, Gijsen FJ et al (2010) 3D fusion of intravascular ultrasound and coronary computed tomography for in-vivo wall shear stress analysis: a feasibility study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:781–796
Chatzizisis YS, Jonas M, Coskun AU et al (2008) Prediction of the localization of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the basis of low endothelial shear stress: an intravascular ultrasound and histopathology natural history study. Circulation 117:993–1002
Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA et al (2002) Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol 90:210–215
Yang C, Bach RG, Zheng J et al (2009) In vivo IVUS-based 3-D fluid-structure interaction models with cyclic bending and anisotropic vessel properties for human atherosclerotic coronary plaque mechanical analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56:2420–2428
Kim H, Vignon-Clementel I, Coogan J, Figueroa C, Jansen K, Taylor C (2010) Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 38:3195–3209
Melchionna S, Bernaschi M, Succi S et al (2010) Hydrokinetic approach to large-scale cardiovascular blood flow. Comput Phys Commun 181:462–472
Kim HJ, Vignon-Clementel IE, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA (2010) Developing computational methods for three-dimensional finite element simulations of coronary blood flow. Finite Elem Anal Des 46:514–525
Kim H, Vignon-Clementel I, Figueroa C et al (2009) On coupling a lumped parameter heart model and a three-dimensional finite element aorta model. Ann Biomed Eng 37:2153–2169
St. Goar F, Min JK, Koo B-K, Taylor C (2012) CTA-derived coronary FFR: the “holy Grail” of noninvasive imaging? Cardiac Interventions Today, March/April, pp 44–48
Koo B-K, Erglis A, Doh J-H et al (2011) Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms: results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1989–1997
Martus P, Schueler S, Dewey M (2012) Fractional flow reserve estimation by coronary computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1410–1411, author reply 1411
Min JK, Berman DS, Budoff MJ et al (2011) Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:301–309
Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 308:1237-1245
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kakouros, N., Rybicki, F.J., Mitsouras, D. et al. Coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve in the assessment of coronary artery stenoses. Eur Radiol 23, 958–967 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2670-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2670-4