Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Three-dimensional transient finite element cooling simulation for injection molding tools

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plastic injection molding is one of the most popular manufacturing processes for mass production, and optimizing the mold cooling system is critical for reducing the cycle time and improving the final part quality. This paper develops a three-dimensional transient cooling simulation model based on the finite element method. Comparing with the conventional cycle-averaged cooling model that uses boundary element method, this method has two major advantages: First, the transient mold temperature is more accurate than the cycle-averaged mold temperature. Second, this method allows performing cooling simulation directly on the real-world mold models without the simplifications that required by the boundary element method. To speed up the transient cooling simulation, this method uses the cycle-averaged cooling model as initial condition and applies the heat flux conservation equations at the discontinuous mesh boundaries to eliminate the interface iterations. It is shown that this method finishes the transient cooling analysis in 478 s on the real-world injection molding mold with more than 6.9 million tetrahedral elements, which is a satisfactory time for practical usages. The simulation result is validated by the actual molding experiment. It is found that the maximum temperature error is less than 4% and the average temperature error is less than 1%. The validation proves the accuracy of this simulation method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data and models generated or used during the study appear in the submitted manuscript.

Code availability

All code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted manuscript.

References

  1. Sardo L, Daldoul W, Vincent M, Toulorge T (2019) Simulations of heat transfer in thermoplastic injection molds manufactured by additive techniques. Int Polym Proc 34(1):37–46. https://doi.org/10.3139/217.3594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kwon TH (1988) Mold cooling system design using boundary element method. Journal of Engineering for Industry 110(4):384–394. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3187898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koo BH, Choi KI (2005) Three-dimensional mold cooling analysis for injection molding process. society of plastics engineers. Annu Tech Conf 2:103

  4. Qiao H (2006) A systematic computer-aided approach to cooling system optimal design in plastic injection molding. Int J Mech Sci 48(4):430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.11.001

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hioe Y, Chang KC, Zuyev K, Bhagavatula N, Castro JM (2008) A simplified approach to predict part temperature and minimum “safe” cycle time. Polym Eng Sci 48(9):1737–1746. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.21133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou H, Zhang Y, Wen J, Li D (2009) An acceleration method for the BEM-based cooling simulation of injection molding. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 33(8–9):1022–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2009.04.001

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Y, Huang Z, Zhou H, Li D (2015) A rapid BEM-based method for cooling simulation of injection molding. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 52:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2014.11.020

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Li Z, Wang X, Gu J, Ruan S, Shen C, Lyu Y, Zhao Y (2018) Topology optimization for the design of conformal cooling system in thin-wall injection molding based on BEM. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 94(1):1041–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang LQ, Pochiraju K, Chassapis C, Manoochehri S (1996) Three-dimensional transient mold cooling analysis based on galerkin finite element formulation with a matrix-free conjugate gradient technique. Int J Numer Meth Eng 39(18):3049–3064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang RY, Hsu D, Yang V, Yang W (2003) Three-dimensional computer-aided mold cooling design for injection molding. Proceedings of the annual technical conference – ANTEC, conference proceedings society of plastics engineers 1:656–660

  11. Malhotra D, Biros G (2016) Algorithm 967: a distributed-memory fast multipole method for volume potentials. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 43(2):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2898349

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Michiels B, Fostier J, Bogaert I, De Zutter D (2015) Full-wave simulations of electromagnetic scattering problems with billions of unknowns. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 63(2):796–799. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2014.2380438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Adelman R, Gumerov NA, Duraiswami R (2017) FMM/GPU-accelerated boundary element method for computational magnetics and electrostatics. IEEE Trans Magn 53(12):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2017.2725951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Erhart K, Divo E, Kassab AJ (2006) A parallel domain decomposition boundary element method approach for the solution of large-scale transient heat conduction problems. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 30(7):553–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2005.12.004

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng Z, Shao Y, Gao H, Wang S, Lin S (2017) High-fidelity, high-performance computational algorithms for intrasystem electromagnetic interference analysis of IC and electronics. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology 7:653–668. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCPMT.2016.2636296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Adelman R (2021) Highly parallel boundary element method for solving extremely large, wide-area power-line models. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 35(2):136–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342020976783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aliyeva N, Sas HS, Okan BS (2021) Recent developments on the overmolding process for the fabrication of thermoset and thermoplastic composites by the integration of nano/micron-scale reinforcements. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 149:106525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sánchez R, Martinez A, Mercado D, Carbonel A, Aisa J (2021) Rapid heating injection moulding: an experimental surface temperature study. Polym Testing 93:106928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Y, Gehde M (2015) Evaluation of heat transfer coefficient between polymer and cavity wall for improving cooling and crystallinity results in injection molding simulation. Appl Therm Eng 80:238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.01.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Park EM, Kim SK (2019) Effects of mold heat transfer coefficient on numerical simulation of injection molding. Trans Korean Soc Mech Eng B 43(3):201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu L, Min L, Li X, Zhai Z, Drummer D, Jiang B (2019) Effects of process conditions on the heat transfer coefficient at the polymer-mold interface and tensile strength of thin-wall injection molding parts. J Polym Eng 39(5):493–500. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2018-0369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van der Vorst HA (1992) BI-CGSTAB: a fast and smoothly converging variant of BI-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 13(2):631–644. https://doi.org/10.1137/0913035

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kennedy P, Zheng R (2013) Flow analysis of injection molds. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG, Germany

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No. U20A20288.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China

    Lu Chen, Xiaowei Zhou, Zhigao Huang & Huamin Zhou

Authors
  1. Lu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaowei Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhigao Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huamin Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Zhigao Huang conceived the idea; Zhigao Huang and Lu Chen conducted the analyses; Lu Chen and Xiaowei Zhou participated in the development and testing of the prototype system; all authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhigao Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, L., Zhou, X., Huang, Z. et al. Three-dimensional transient finite element cooling simulation for injection molding tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 7919–7936 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09154-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09154-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation