Abstract
Discrete material optimization (DMO) is a method, which was originally developed for designing composite structures via multi-material topology optimization principles. Current study applies DMO to sandwich structures with variable thickness in the core and face sheets. Each layer contains design variables for available materials. Materials are combined through interpolation schemes to define properties of the layer. The objective function (mass of the structure) and the failure constraints are interpolated via Rational Approximation of Material Properties (RAMP) in order to calculate with smooth variables, but achieve discrete results. This enables gradient optimization via Interior Point Optimizer (IPOPT) with constraints on maximum stress, wrinkling, and crimping. Structure is modeled by the finite element method, which calculates element forces and moments repeatedly as the stiffness of the structure changes during optimization. Element loads are used by the first-order shear deformation theory to evaluate the stresses in the layers to obtain failure constraints requested in each iteration by the gradient optimizer. Solution is demonstrated on the plate examples showing material distribution and discreteness level. In addition, constraint aggregation by Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser (KS) function was utilized to decrease the number of constraints in the optimization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Material input values are from referenced sources. Calculated results are shown in the paper.
Code availability
Source code is not published by now, but is available upon request.
References
Bruggi M (2008) On an alternative approach to stress constraints relaxation in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 36:125–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0203-6
Cheng GD, Guo X (1997) ε-relaxed approach in structural topology optimization. Struct Optim 13:258–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197454
Data Sheet 01.2020 (2020) Data Sheet 01.2020: Airex C70. https://www.3accorematerials.com/uploads/documents/TDS-AIREX-C70-E-01.2020.pdf. Accessed 16 Jul 2020
Di Sciuva M, Gherlone M, Lomario D (2003) Multiconstrained optimization of laminated and sandwich plates using evolutionary algorithms and higher-order plate theories. Compos Struct 59:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00132-0
Duysinx P, Sigmund O (1998) New developments in handling stress constraints in optimal material distribution. 7th AIAAUSAFNASAISSMO Symp Multidiscip Anal Optim. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-4906
Ferenc T, Mikulski T (2020) Parametric optimization of sandwich composite footbridge with U-shaped cross-section. Compos Struct 246:112406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112406
Gantovnik VB, Gürdal Z, Watson LT (2002) A genetic algorithm with memory for optimal design of laminated sandwich composite panels. Compos Struct 58:513–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00128-9
Gao T, Zhang W (2011) A mass constraint formulation for structural topology optimization with multiphase materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 88:774–796. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.3197
Ghiasi H, Pasini D, Lessard L (2009) Optimum stacking sequence design of composite materials part I: constant stiffness design. Compos Struct 90:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.01.006
Ghiasi H, Fayazbakhsh K, Pasini D, Lessard L (2010) Optimum stacking sequence design of composite materials part II: variable stiffness design. Compos Struct 93:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.001
Gibiansky LV, Sigmund O (2000) Multiphase composites with extremal bulk modulus. J Mech Phys Solids 48:461–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00043-5
Hoff NJ, Mautner SE (1945) The buckling of bandwich-type panels. J Aeronaut Sci 12:285–297. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.11246
Holmberg E, Torstenfelt B, Klarbring A (2013) Stress constrained topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48:33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-012-0880-7
IDAFLIEG (1988) Dimensionierungsrichtwerte für den Segel und Motorsegelflugzeugbau (Dimensioning guide values for gliders and motor gliders). Interessengemeinschaft Deutscher Akademischer Fliegergrupen (IDAFLIEG). Braunschweig, Germany
Kennedy GJ (2016) A full-space barrier method for stress-constrained discrete material design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54:619–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1428-z
Kennedy GJ, Hicken JE (2015) Improved constraint-aggregation methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 289:332–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.02.017
Kraft D (1988) A software package for sequential quadratic programming. Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DFVLR), Institut für Dynamik der Flugsysteme Oberpfaffenhofen (German Test and Research Institute for Aviation and Space Flight, Oberpfaffenhofen Institute of Flight System Dynamic)
Kreisselmeier G, Steinhauser R (1980) Systematic control design by optimizing a vector performance index. Comput Aided Des Control Syst:113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-024488-4.50022-X
Kristinsdottir BP, Zabinsky ZB, Tuttle ME, Neogi S (2001) Optimal design of large composite panels with varying loads. Compos Struct 51:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00128-8
Lambe AB, Kennedy GJ, Martins JRRA (2017) An evaluation of constraint aggregation strategies for wing box mass minimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55:257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1495-1
Le C, Norato J, Bruns T et al (2010) Stress-based topology optimization for continua. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41:605–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0440-y
Lund E (2009) Buckling topology optimization of laminated multi-material composite shell structures. Compos Struct 91:158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.046
Lund E (2018) Discrete material and thickness optimization of laminated composite structures including failure criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57:2357–2375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1866-2
Lund E, Stegmann J (2005) On structural optimization of composite shell structures using a discrete constitutive parametrization. Wind Energy 8:109–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.132
Nikbakt S, Kamarian S, Shakeri M (2018) A review on optimization of composite structures Part I: Laminated composites. Compos Struct 195:158–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.063
París J, Navarrina F, Colominas I, Casteleiro M (2010) Block aggregation of stress constraints in topology optimization of structures. Adv Eng Softw 41:433–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.03.006
Píštěk A (1980) Optimalizace leteckých konstrukcí s využitím metody konečných prvků (Aircraft structure optimization with use of finite element method). Vojenská akademie Antonína Zápotockého (Military Academy of Antonín Zápotocký). Brno, Czech Republic
Reddy JN (2003) Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells: theory and analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Sigmund O, Torquato S (1997) Design of materials with extreme thermal expansion using a three-phase topology optimization method. J Mech Phys Solids 45:1037–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(96)00114-7
Sjølund JH, Peeters D, Lund E (2019) Discrete material and thickness optimization of sandwich structures. Compos Struct 217:75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.003
Sohouli A, Yildiz M, Suleman A (2017) Design optimization of thin-walled composite structures based on material and fiber orientation. Compos Struct 176:1081–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.030
Sonmez FO (2017) Optimum design of composite structures: a literature survey (1969–2009). J Reinf Plast Compos 36:3–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684416668262
Soremekun G, Gürdal Z, Kassapoglou C, Toni D (2002) Stacking sequence blending of multiple composite laminates using genetic algorithms. Compos Struct 56:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00185-4
Sørensen SN, Lund E (2013) Topology and thickness optimization of laminated composites including manufacturing constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48:249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0904-y
Sørensen R, Lund E (2015) Thickness filters for gradient based multi-material and thickness optimization of laminated composite structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52:227–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1230-3
Sørensen SN, Sørensen R, Lund E (2014) DMTO – a method for discrete material and thickness optimization of laminated composite structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 50:25–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1047-5
Stegmann J, Lund E (2005) Discrete material optimization of general composite shell structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 62:2009–2027. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1259
Stolpe M, Svanberg K (2001) An alternative interpolation scheme for minimum compliance topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 22:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001580100129
Sullins RT, Smith GW, Spier EE (1969) Manual for structural stability analysis of sandwich plates and shells. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19700004831
Symonov VS, Karpov IS, Juračka J (2013) Optimization of a panelled smooth composite shell with a closed cross-sectional contour by using a genetic algorithm. Mech Compos Mater 49:563–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-013-9372-0
Tapp C, Hansel W, Mittelstedt C, Becker W (2004) Weight-minimization of sandwich structures by a heuristic topology optimization algorithm. Comput Model Eng Sci Henderson 5:563–574. https://doi.org/10.3970/cmes.2004.005.563
Velea MN, Wennhage P, Zenkert D (2014) Multi-objective optimisation of vehicle bodies made of FRP sandwich structures. Compos Struct 111:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.030
Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE et al (2020) SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 17:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
Wächter A, Biegler LT (2006) On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math Program 106:25–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y
Funding
Research was supported by the affiliate institution and state scholarship of the doctoral study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Replication of results
Program source code is not published by now, but is available upon request.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: W. H. Zhang
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Löffelmann, F. Discrete material optimization with sandwich failure constraints. Struct Multidisc Optim 64, 2513–2523 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03006-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03006-x