Abstract
This paper develops and evaluates a method for handling stress constraints in topology optimization. The stress constraints are used together with an objective function that minimizes mass or maximizes stiffness, and in addition, the traditional stiffness based formulation is discussed for comparison. We use a clustering technique, where stresses for several stress evaluation points are clustered into groups using a modified P-norm to decrease the number of stress constraints and thus the computational cost. We give a detailed description of the formulations and the sensitivity analysis. This is done in a general manner, so that different element types and 2D as well as 3D structures can be treated. However, we restrict the numerical examples to 2D structures with bilinear quadrilateral elements. The three formulations and different approaches to stress constraints are compared using two well known test examples in topology optimization: the L-shaped beam and the MBB-beam. In contrast to some other papers on stress constrained topology optimization, we find that our formulation gives topologies that are significantly different from traditionally optimized designs, in that it actually manage to avoid stress concentrations. It can therefore be used to generate conceptual designs for industrial applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allaire G, Jouve F (2008) Minimum stress optimal design with the level set method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 32(11):909–918
Amstutz S, Novotny A (2010) Topological optimization of structures subject to von Mises stress constraints. Struct Multidisc Optim 41(3):407–420
Bendsøe M (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Multidisc Optim 1(4):193–202
Bendsøe M, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71(2):197–224
Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization—theory, methods, and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Bendsøe M, Ben-Tal A, Zowe J (1994) Optimization methods for truss geometry and topology design. Struct Multidisc Optim 7(3):141–159
Bruggi M (2008) On an alternative approach to stress constraints relaxation in topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 36(2):125–141
Bruns T, Tortorelli D (2001) Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(26–27):3443–3459
Cheng G, Guo X (1997) ε-relaxed approach in structural topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 13(4):258–266
Christensen P, Klarbring A (2008) An introduction to structural optimization, vol 153. Springer, Berlin
Cook R, Malkus D, Plesha M, Witt R (2002) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. Wiley, New York
Dorn W, Gomory R, Greenberg H (1964) Automatic design of optimal structures. J Méc 3(6):25–52
Duysinx P, Bendsøe M (1998) Topology optimization of continuum structures with local stress constraints. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43(8):1453–1478
Duysinx P, Sigmund O (1998) New developments in handling optimal stress constraints in optimal material distribution. In: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary design optimization, AIAA Paper 98-4906, pp 1501–1509
Guo X, Cheng G, Yamazaki K (2001) A new approach for the solution of singular optima in truss topology optimization with stress and local buckling constraints. Struct Multidisc Optim 22(5):364–373
Guo X, Zhang W, Wang M, Wei P (2011) Stress-related topology optimization via level set approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(47):3439–3452
Hughes T (1987) The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Kirsch U (1990) On singular topologies in optimum structural design. Struct Multidisc Optim 2(3):133–142
Kočvara M, Stingl M (2012) Solving stress constrained problems in topology and material optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 46(1):1–15
Le C, Norato J, Bruns T, Ha C, Tortorelli D (2010) Stress-based topology optimization for continua. Struct Multidisc Optim 41(4):605–620
París J, Navarrina F, Colominas I, Casteleiro M (2009) Topology optimization of continuum structures with local and global stress constraints. Struct Multidisc Optim 39(4):419–437
París J, Navarrina F, Colominas I, Casteleiro M (2010) Block aggregation of stress constraints in topology optimization of structures. Adv Eng Softw 41(3):433–441
Rozvany G, Birker T (1994) On singular topologies in exact layout optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 8(4):228–235
Rozvany G, Zhou M, Birker T (1992) Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Struct Multidisc Optim 4(3):250–252
Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):359–373
Svanberg K (2002) A class of globally convergent optimization methods based on conservative convex separable approximations. SIAM J Optim 12(2):555–573
Svanberg K, Werme M (2007) Sequential integer programming methods for stress constrained topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 34(4):277–299
Sved G, Ginos Z (1968) Structural optimization under multiple loading. Int J Mech Sci 10(10):803–805
Torstenfelt B (2012) The TRINITAS project. http://www.solid.iei.liu.se/Offered_services/Trinitas. Accessed 4 Sept 2012
Werme M (2008) Using the sequential linear integer programming method as a post-processor for stress-constrained topology optimization problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 76(10):1544–1567
Yang R, Chen C (1996) Stress-based topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 12(2):98–105
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holmberg, E., Torstenfelt, B. & Klarbring, A. Stress constrained topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 48, 33–47 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-012-0880-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-012-0880-7