Abstract
This article presents emerging results from a phenomenographic study that examines Bangladeshi university students’ experience of using mobile devices in their learning. Three students from one renowned university participated in the semi-structured interviews to explore their experiences of m-learning. The findings revealed that university students viewed mobile learning (m-learning) in four qualitatively different ways that were: (i) storing learning materials; (ii) accessing information and knowledge; (iii) effective learning tool; and (iv) effective tool for collaboration. This study is constructed on previous studies of university students’ conceptions of learning. However, the focus taken in this research was on the experience of m-learning, as an emerging research area, which revealed new facets of university learning. The findings of this study play a significant role in the faculty development program and have an impact on the teaching and learning practices in university education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Learning about phenomenography: interviewing, data analysis and the qualitative research paradigm. In J. Bowden & P. Green (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography (pp. 63–74). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
Al-Fahad, F. N. (2009). Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. Online Submission, 8(2).
Barnard, A., McCosker, H., & Gerber, R. (1999). Phenomenography: A qualitative research approach for exploring understanding in health care. Qualitative Health Research, 9(2), 212–226.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
Bruce, C., Buckingham, L., Hynd, J., McMahon, C., Roggenkamp, M., & Stoodley, I. (2004). Ways of experiencing the act of learning to program: A phenomenographic study of introductory programming students at university. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 3(1), 145–160.
Duarte, A. (2007). Conceptions of learning and approaches to learning in Portuguese students. Higher Education, 54(6), 781–794. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9023-7.
Eklund-Myrskog, G. (1998). Students’ conceptions of learning in different educational contexts. Higher Education, 35(3), 299–316. doi:10.1023/a:1003145613005.
Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O’Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 22(4), 244–256. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00173.x.
Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Calvo, R. A., & Prosser, M. (2008). Engineering students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 267–282.
Forster, M. (2013). A phenomenographic investigation into information literacy in nursing practice—Preliminary findings and methodological issues. Nurse Education Today, 33(10), 1237–1241.
González, C. (2009). Conceptions of, and approaches to, teaching online: a study of lecturers teaching postgraduate distance courses. Higher Education, 57(3), 299–314. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9145-1.
Hammond, M. (2014). Introducing ICT in schools in England: Rationale and consequences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 191–201.
Hammond, M., Reynolds, L., & Ingram, J. (2011). How and why do student teachers use ICT? Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 27(3), 191–203.
Harris, L. R. (2011). Phenomenographic perspectives on the structure of conceptions: The origins, purposes, strengths, and limitations of the what/how and referential/structural frameworks. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 109–124. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.01.002.
Hashim, K. F., Tan, F. B., & Rashid, A. (2014). Adult learners’ intention to adopt mobile learning: A motivational perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2). doi: 10.1111/bjet.12148.
Kafyulilo, A. (2014). Access, use and perceptions of teachers and students towards mobile phones as a tool for teaching and learning in Tanzania. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 115–127.
Karim, M. A. (2010). Digital Bangladesh for Good governance. Paper presented at the Bangladesh Development Forum 2010, Bangabandhu International Conference Centre. Retrieved from http://www.lcgbangladesh.org/bdf-2010/BG_Paper/BDF2010_SessionVI.pdf.
Khan, S. H. (2014). Phenomenography: a qualitative research methodology in Bangladesh. International Journal on new trends in education and their implication, 5(2), 34–43.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.
Limbu, L., & Markauskaite, L. (2015). How do learners experience joint writing: University students’ conceptions of online collaborative writing tasks and environments. Computers & Education, 82, 393–408.
Lucas, U. (2001). Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: A phenomenographic study. Accounting Education, 10(2), 161–184.
Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Noor-Ul-Amin, S. (2013). An effective use of ICT for education and learning by drawing on worldwide knowledge, research, and experience: ICT as a change agent for education. Scholarly Journal of Education, 2(4), 38–45.
Ozdamli, F., & Cavus, N. (2011). Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 937–942.
Ozdamli, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2014). M‐learning adequacy and perceptions of students and teachers in secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605.
Potyrala, K. (2001). ICT tools in biology education.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Rogers, Y., Connelly, K., Hazlewood, W., & Tedesco, L. (2010). Enhancing learning: a study of how mobile devices can facilitate sensemaking. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14(2), 111–124.
Serin, O. (2012). Mobile learning perceptions of the prospective teachers (Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus sampling). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(3), 222–233.
Sha, L., Looi, C.-K., Chen, W., Seow, P., & Wong, L.-H. (2012). Recognizing and measuring self-regulated learning in a mobile learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 718–728.
Sin, S. (2010). Considerations of quality in phenomenographic research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(4), 305–319.
Vermunt, J., & Vermetten, Y. (2004). Patterns in student learning: relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y.
Virtanen, V., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2010). University students’ and teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in the biosciences. Instructional Science, 38(4), 355–370. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9088-z.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Bob Fox, Professor, School of Education, UNSW for his useful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khan, M.H., Abdou, B.O., Clement, C.K. (2016). University Student Conceptions of M-learning in Bangladesh . In: Churchill, D., Lu, J., Chiu, T., Fox, B. (eds) Mobile Learning Design. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0025-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0027-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)