Skip to main content

University Student Conceptions of M-learning in Bangladesh 

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mobile Learning Design

Abstract

This article presents emerging results from a phenomenographic study that examines Bangladeshi university students’ experience of using mobile devices in their learning. Three students from one renowned university participated in the semi-structured interviews to explore their experiences of m-learning. The findings revealed that university students viewed mobile learning (m-learning) in four qualitatively different ways that were: (i) storing learning materials; (ii) accessing information and knowledge; (iii) effective learning tool; and (iv) effective tool for collaboration. This study is constructed on previous studies of university students’ conceptions of learning. However, the focus taken in this research was on the experience of m-learning, as an emerging research area, which revealed new facets of university learning. The findings of this study play a significant role in the faculty development program and have an impact on the teaching and learning practices in university education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Learning about phenomenography: interviewing, data analysis and the qualitative research paradigm. In J. Bowden & P. Green (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography (pp. 63–74). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fahad, F. N. (2009). Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. Online Submission, 8(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, A., McCosker, H., & Gerber, R. (1999). Phenomenography: A qualitative research approach for exploring understanding in health care. Qualitative Health Research, 9(2), 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C., Buckingham, L., Hynd, J., McMahon, C., Roggenkamp, M., & Stoodley, I. (2004). Ways of experiencing the act of learning to program: A phenomenographic study of introductory programming students at university. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 3(1), 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, A. (2007). Conceptions of learning and approaches to learning in Portuguese students. Higher Education, 54(6), 781–794. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9023-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eklund-Myrskog, G. (1998). Students’ conceptions of learning in different educational contexts. Higher Education, 35(3), 299–316. doi:10.1023/a:1003145613005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O’Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 22(4), 244–256. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00173.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Calvo, R. A., & Prosser, M. (2008). Engineering students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, M. (2013). A phenomenographic investigation into information literacy in nursing practice—Preliminary findings and methodological issues. Nurse Education Today, 33(10), 1237–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, C. (2009). Conceptions of, and approaches to, teaching online: a study of lecturers teaching postgraduate distance courses. Higher Education, 57(3), 299–314. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9145-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. (2014). Introducing ICT in schools in England: Rationale and consequences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M., Reynolds, L., & Ingram, J. (2011). How and why do student teachers use ICT? Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 27(3), 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. R. (2011). Phenomenographic perspectives on the structure of conceptions: The origins, purposes, strengths, and limitations of the what/how and referential/structural frameworks. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 109–124. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashim, K. F., Tan, F. B., & Rashid, A. (2014). Adult learners’ intention to adopt mobile learning: A motivational perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2). doi: 10.1111/bjet.12148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafyulilo, A. (2014). Access, use and perceptions of teachers and students towards mobile phones as a tool for teaching and learning in Tanzania. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karim, M. A. (2010). Digital Bangladesh for Good governance. Paper presented at the Bangladesh Development Forum 2010, Bangabandhu International Conference Centre. Retrieved from http://www.lcgbangladesh.org/bdf-2010/BG_Paper/BDF2010_SessionVI.pdf.

  • Khan, S. H. (2014). Phenomenography: a qualitative research methodology in Bangladesh. International Journal on new trends in education and their implication, 5(2), 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limbu, L., & Markauskaite, L. (2015). How do learners experience joint writing: University students’ conceptions of online collaborative writing tasks and environments. Computers & Education, 82, 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, U. (2001). Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: A phenomenographic study. Accounting Education, 10(2), 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor-Ul-Amin, S. (2013). An effective use of ICT for education and learning by drawing on worldwide knowledge, research, and experience: ICT as a change agent for education. Scholarly Journal of Education, 2(4), 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdamli, F., & Cavus, N. (2011). Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 937–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdamli, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2014). M‐learning adequacy and perceptions of students and teachers in secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potyrala, K. (2001). ICT tools in biology education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Y., Connelly, K., Hazlewood, W., & Tedesco, L. (2010). Enhancing learning: a study of how mobile devices can facilitate sensemaking. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14(2), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serin, O. (2012). Mobile learning perceptions of the prospective teachers (Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus sampling). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(3), 222–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sha, L., Looi, C.-K., Chen, W., Seow, P., & Wong, L.-H. (2012). Recognizing and measuring self-regulated learning in a mobile learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 718–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sin, S. (2010). Considerations of quality in phenomenographic research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(4), 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J., & Vermetten, Y. (2004). Patterns in student learning: relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen, V., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2010). University students’ and teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in the biosciences. Instructional Science, 38(4), 355–370. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9088-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Bob Fox, Professor, School of Education, UNSW for his useful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Shahadat Hossain Khan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khan, M.H., Abdou, B.O., Clement, C.K. (2016). University Student Conceptions of M-learning in Bangladesh . In: Churchill, D., Lu, J., Chiu, T., Fox, B. (eds) Mobile Learning Design. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0025-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0027-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics