Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptions of learning and approaches to learning in Portuguese students

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article describes a study that attempted to characterise Portuguese students’ conceptions of learning and approaches to learning. A sample of university students answered open questions on the meaning, process and context of learning. Results, derived from content analysis, replicate most conceptions of learning described by phenomenographical research (i.e. distinction between learning as memorisation and learning as comprehension). Moreover, new variants of known conceptions of learning emerged (e.g. learning occurs through: exploratory practice; learning to learn; motivation) and an apparently new conception (i.e. learning as understanding and application). The same sample answered a questionnaire which attempted to measure motivation and learning strategies. Through factorial analysis of results it was possible to confirm the presence of three well-known approaches to learning: surface, deep and achieving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman J. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. London: Cambridge University Press.

  • Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1988). Approaches to learning and to essay writing. In R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 185–228). NY: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1990). Teaching for desired learning outcomes. In N. Entwistle (Ed.), Handbook of␣educational ideas and practices (pp. 681–693). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Wilss, L., & Mutch, S. (1994). Teachers as adult learners: Their knowledge of their own learning and implications for teaching. Higher Education, 31, 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, J. M., & Marshall, D. (2004). Between deep and surface: Procedural approaches to learning in engineering contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 605–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A.F. (1998). Teacher-learners' conceptions of learning: Evidence of a ``communalist'' conception amongst postgraduate learners? Higher Education, 35(2), 205–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, A. M. (1997). Approaches to learning and writing: Development of an inventory for secondary students (“IPEs”-2 v.), Presented at the 4th Conference on Psychological Assessment, Lisbon.

  • Eklund-Myrskog, G. (1998). Students’ conceptions of learning in different educational contexts’. Higher Education, 35, 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (1990). Handbook of educational ideas and practices. London and New York: Routledge

  • Entwistle, N., & Entwistle, D. (2003). Preparing for examinations: The interplay of memorizing and understanding, and the development of knowledge objects. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Peterson, E.R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 407–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, N. (1983). Understanding student learning. London and Canberra: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, J. G. (1994). Análisis de datos cualitativos—aplicaciones a la investigación educativa. Barcelona: PPV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M. G. (1996). Dar sentido a los datos: la combinacion de perspectivas cualitativo y cuantitativo em el analisis de entrevistas. Technical report, Universidad de Sevilla.

  • Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning: Theory and practice. Bristol: TES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggis, T. (2003). Constructing images of ourselves? A critical investigation into ‘approaches to learning’ research in higher education. British Educational research Journal, 29, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkillä, A., & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: Students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (1997). Learning from problem-solving. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications to teaching and studying in higher education (2nd␣ed.). Edinburgh: The Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonka, K., Olkinuora, E., & Mäkinen, J. (2004). Aspects and prospects of measuring studying and learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 301–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography—Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1988). Describing and improving learning. In R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 53–82). NY: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of␣educational Research, 19(3), 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning—I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Watkins, D., & Tang, C. (1997). Discontinuities and continuities in the experience of learning: An interview study of high school students in Hong Kong. Learning and Instruction, 7, 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd␣ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A., Taylor, E., & Gibbs, G. (1982). Variations in students’ approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students’ approaches to learning and teachers’ approaches to teaching in higher education. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 673–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (1979). Learning about learning. Higher Education, 8, 443–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Säljö (1994). Minding action. Conceiving of the world versus participating in cultural practices. Nordisk Pedagogik, 2, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. R., & Bain, J. D. (1982). Consistency in learning strategies. Higher Education, 11, 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Ashwin, P. (2006). An exploratory study of situated conceptions of learning and learning environments. Higher Education, 51, 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink, K., Alemany, I., Plat, A., Duarte, A. Ericsson, L., & Slack, R. (2000). Students’ learning with educational multimedia in school—A multinational study. Presented at the X␣Coloque AFIRSE Portugaise, Lisbon.

  • Vermunt, J.D., & Vermetten, Y.J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D., & Regmi, M. (1990). An investigation of the approach to learning of Nepalese tertiary students. Higher Education 20, 459–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D., & Regmi, M. (1992). How universal are student conceptions of learning? A Nepalese investigation. Psychologia 35, 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author is obliged to Tom Kundert and Allison Byrne for language revision and to two anonymous reviewers for helpful remarks on previous versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to António M. Duarte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duarte, A.M. Conceptions of learning and approaches to learning in Portuguese students. High Educ 54, 781–794 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9023-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9023-7

Keywords

Navigation