Skip to main content
Log in

The Spatial Distribution of Fungi on Decomposing Woody Litter in a Freshwater Stream, Western Ghats, India

  • Fungal Microbiology
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We mapped filamentous fungal association with mechanically “hard” and “soft” woody litter naturally deposited in a stream of the Western Ghats of India. Using a durometer (rubber hardness tester), the toughness of surface of wood collected from stream was determined by considering durometer reading from 60–72 to 30–37 as hardwood and softwood, respectively. From each wood (1.5 cm diameter), two segments each of 3 cm length were excised and vertically cut into nine sections comprising eight marginal and one central section. From three stream locations, hardwood and softwood sections were assessed for the occurrence of lignicolous and Ingoldian fungi. A first set of wood sections was incubated in damp chambers up to 4 months with periodical screening (every 2 weeks) for lignicolous fungi. Another set was incubated in bubble chambers up to 72 h to ascertain colonization of Ingoldian fungi. In hardwood sections, 17 lignicolous fungi (ascomycetes, four; mitosporic fungi, 13; mean, 6.8; range, 6–8/section) and ten Ingoldian fungi (mean, 2; range, 0–4/section) comprising nine lignicolous (11.1–40.7%) and three Ingoldian (11.1–14.8%) fungi as core-group taxa were recovered. In softwood, ten lignicolous fungi (ascomycetes, 0; mitosporic fungi, ten; mean, 3.8; range, 2–5/section) and 26 Ingoldian fungi (mean, 8.1; range, 5–10/section) comprising six lignicolous (11.1–85.2%) and 12 Ingoldian (11.1–88.9%) fungi as core-group taxa were recovered. The ratio of lignicolous fungi/Ingoldian fungi was higher in hardwood than softwood (1.7 vs. 0.4). The spore output of Ingoldian fungi was higher in softwood (mean, 901 g−1; range, 80–2546 g−1) than hardwood (mean, 21 g−1; range, 0–140 g−1). The Shannon diversity of lignicolous fungi was higher in hardwood than softwood (3.604 vs. 2.665), whereas it was opposite for Ingoldian fungi (3.116 vs. 3.918). The overall fungal diversity was higher in softwood than hardwood (4.413 vs. 4.219). The range of Jaccard’s index of similarity among wood sections was higher in lignicolous fungi (8–71% and 13–75%) than Ingoldian fungi (0–50% and 8–55%) in hardwood and softwood. The rarefaction indices of expected number of taxa against hardwood sections revealed higher and persistent lignicolous fungi than the Ingoldian fungi, while the Ingoldian fungi were persistent in softwood sections, although they were lower than lignicolous fungi. Our study demonstrated the dominance of lignicolous fungi and Ingoldian fungi in hardwood and softwood, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gulis V, Suberkropp K, Rosemond AD (1998) Comparison of fungal activities on wood and leaf litter in unaltered and nutrient-enriched headwater streams. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1094–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shearer CA, Descals E, Kohlmeyer B, Kohlmeyer J, Marvanová L, Padgett D, Porter D, Raja HA, Schmit JP, Thorton HA, Voglymayr H (2007) Fungal biodiversity in aquatic habitats. Biodivers Conser 16:49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Simonis JL, Raja HA, Shearer CA (2008) Extracellular enzymes and soft rot decay: Are ascomycetes important degraders in fresh water? Fungal Divers 31:135–146

    Google Scholar 

  4. Triska FJ, Cromack FJ Jr (1980) The role of wood debris in forests and streams. In: Waring RH (ed) Forests: fresh perspectives from ecosystem analysis. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 171–190

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cai L, Hyde KD, Tsui CKM (2006) Genera of freshwater fungi. Fungal diversity research series # 18. Fungal Diversity, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fryar SC, Booth W, Davies J, Hodgkiss IJ, Hyde KD (2004) Distribution of fungi on wood in the Tutong River, Brunei. Fungal Divers 17:17–38

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goh TK, Hyde KD (1999) Fungi on submerged wood and bamboo in the Plover Cove Reservoir, Hong Kong. Fungal Divers 3:57–85

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gulis V (2001) Are there any substrate preferences in aquatic hyphomycetes? Mycol Res 105:1088–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho WH, Yanna HKD, Hodgkiss IJ (2002) Seasonality and sequential occurrence of fungi on wood submerged in Tai Po Kau Forest Stream, Hong Kong. Fungal Divers 10:21–43

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hu D, Cai L, Chen H, Bahkali AH, Hyde KD (2010) Fungal diversity on submerged wood in a tropical stream and an artificial lake. Biodiver Conser 19:3799–3808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearman JK, Taylor JE, Kinghorn JR (2010) Fungi in aquatic habitats near St Andrews in Scotland. Mycosphere 1:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raja HA, Miller AN, Shearer CA (2010) Freshwater Ascomycetes: Hyalorostratum brunneisporum, a new genus and species in the Diaporthales (Sordariomycetidae, Sordariomycetes) from North America. Mycosphere 1:275–288

    Google Scholar 

  13. Révay A, Gönczöl J (1990) Longitudinal distribution and colonization pattern of wood-inhabiting fungi in a mountain stream in Hungary. Nova Hedwig 51:505–520

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sivichai S, Jones EBG, Hywel-Jones N (2000) Fungal colonization of wood in a freshwater stream Khoa Yai National Park, Thailand. Fungal Divers 5:71–88

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tsui CKM, Hyde KD (2004) Biodiversity of fungi on submerged wood in a stream and its estuary in the Tai Ho Bay, Hong Kong. Fungal Divers 15:205–220

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tsui CKM, Hyde KD, Hodgkiss IJ (2000) Biodiversity of fungi on submerged wood in Hong Kong streams. Aquat Microb Ecol 21:289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsui CKM, Hyde KD, Hodgkiss IJ (2001) Colonization patterns of wood-inhabiting fungi on baits in Hong Kong rivers, with reference to the effects of organic pollution. Ant van Leeuwenhoek 79:33–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vijaykrishna D, Hyde KD (2006) Inter- and intra stream variation of lignicolous freshwater fungi in tropical Australia. Fungal Divers 21:203–224

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vijaykrishna D, Jeewon R, Hyde KD (2006) Molecular taxonomy, origins and evolution of freshwater ascomycetes. Fungal Divers 23:351–390

    Google Scholar 

  20. Willoughby LB, Archer JF (1973) The fungal spora of a freshwater stream and its colonization pattern on wood. Freshwat Biol 3:219–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wong MKM, Goh TK, Hodgkiss IJ, Hyde KD, Ranghoo VM, Tsui CKM, Ho WH, Wong SWW, Yuen TK (1998) Role of fungi in freshwater ecosystems. Biodiver Conser 7:1187–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Raja HA, Schmit JP, Shearer CA (2009) Latitudinal, habitat and substrate distribution patterns of freshwater ascomycetes in the Florida Peninsula. Biodivers Conser 18:419–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shearer CA (1992) Role of woody debris. In: Bärlocher F (ed) The ecology of aquatic hyphomycetes. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–98

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spänhoff B, Meyer EI (2004) Breakdown rates of wood in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 23:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanders PF, Anderson JM (1979) Colonization of wood blocks by aquatic Hyphomycetes. Trans Br Mycol Soc 73:103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shearer CA, Webster J (1991) Aquatic hyphomycete communities in the River Teign. IV. Twig colonization. Mycol Res 95:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sridhar KR, Karamchand KS, Hyde KD (2010) Wood-inhabiting filamentous fungi in 12 high altitude streams of the Western Ghats by damp incubation and bubble chamber incubation. Mycoscience 51:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bärlocher F (2009) Reproduction and dispersal in aquatic hyphomycetes. Mycoscience 50:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdul-Raheem AM (2004) Study of the effect of different techniques on diversity of freshwater hyphomycetes in the River Nile (Upper Egypt). Mycopathol 157:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chamier A-C, Dixon PA, Archer SA (1984) The spatial distribution of fungi on decomposing alder leaves in a freshwater stream. Oecologia 64:92–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shearer CA, Lane L (1983) Comparison of three techniques for the study of aquatic hyphomycete communities. Mycologia 75:498–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. APHA (1995) Standard methods in examination of water and waste water, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis (15th Edition). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  34. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pielou FD (1975) Ecological diversity. Wiley InterScience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kenkel NC, Booth T (1992) Multivariate analysis in fungal ecology. In: Carroll GC, Wicklow DT (eds) The fungal community: its organization and role in the ecosystem. Dekker, New York, pp 209–227

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF (1988) Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sridhar KR (2009) Fungi in the tree canopy—An appraisal. In: Rai M, Bridge P (eds) Applied mycology. CAB International, UK, pp 73–91

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Stone JF, Sherwood MA, Carroll GC (1996) Canopy microfungi: Function and diversity. Northwest Sci 70:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sokolski S, Piché Y, Chauvet E, Bérubé JA (2006) A fungal endophyte of black spruce (Picea mariana) needles is also an aquatic hyphomycete. Mol Ecol 15:1955–1962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bärlocher F (2006) Fungal endophytes in submerged roots. In: Schulz B, Boyle C, Sieber T (eds) Microbial root endophytes. Springer, Berlin, pp 179–190

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Marvanová L, Fisher F (1991) A new endophytic hyphomycetes from alder roots. Nova Hedwig 52:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  43. Marvanová L, Fisher PJ, Aimer R, Segedin B (1992) A new Filosporella from alder roots and from water. Nova Hedwig 54:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  44. Marvanová Lm Fisher PJ, Descals E, Bärlocher F (1997) Fontanospora sp nov, a hyphomycete from live tree roots and from stream foam. Czech Mycol 50:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sati SC, Arya P, Belwal M (2009) Tetracladium nainitalense sp nov, a root endophyte from Kumaun Himalaya, India. Mycologia 101:692–695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sridhar KR, Bärlocher F (1993) Aquatic hyphomycetes on leaf litter in and near a stream in Nova Scotia, Canada. Mycol Res 97:1430–1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mangalore University for permission to carry out this study at the Department of Biosciences and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. (NPCIL), Mumbai, for funding. NMS is indebted to the NPCIL for the award of research fellowship. Authors are thankful to Drs. H.M. Somashekarappa, University Science Instrumentation Centre, Mangalore University; S.G. Ghadge, M. Kansal, P.M. Ravi, B.N. Dileep, and S.K. Singh, NPCIL, Kaiga, Karnataka, for support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kandikere R. Sridhar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sridhar, K.R., Sudheep, N.M. The Spatial Distribution of Fungi on Decomposing Woody Litter in a Freshwater Stream, Western Ghats, India. Microb Ecol 61, 635–645 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9803-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9803-1

Keywords

Navigation