Abstract
A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was carried out for milk production extending from the origin of the inputs to the agricultural step to the consumer phase and the waste management of the packaging. Three Norwegian dairies of different sizes and degree of automation were studied. The main objectives were to find any hot spots in the life cycle of milk, to determine the significance of the dairy size and degree of automation, and to study the influence of transport. The agriculture was found to be the main hot spot for almost all the environmental themes studied, although the dairy processing, packaging, consumer phase and waste management were also of importance. The consumer phase was the main contributor to photo-oxidant formation and important regarding eutrophication. The small dairy was found to have a greater environmental impact than the middle-sized and the largest dairies. The transport did not have any major influence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson K (1998): Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Food Products and Production Systems. PhD Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden; Int J LCA 5 (4) 239–248 (2000)
Audsley E (Ed); Alber S, Clift R, Cowell S, Gaillard G, Hausheer J, Jolliett O, Kleijn R, Mortensen B, Pearce D, Roger E, Teulon H, Weidema B, van Zeits H (1997): Harmonisation of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Agriculture. Final Report. Concerted Action AIR3-CT94-2028, Silsoe Research Institute, Bedford, UK
Baumann H, Ekvall T, Eriksson E, Kullman M, Rydberg T, Ryding S-O, Steen B, Svensson G (1993): Miljömässiga skillnader mellan återvinning/äteranvending och förbränning/deponering (Environmental comparison between recycling/re-use and incineration/ landfilling). Stiftelsen Reforsk, FoU No 79, Sweden (in Swedish)
Cederberg C (1998): Life cycle Assessment of Milk Production—A comparison of conventional and organic farming. SIK-report No 643, SIK, The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Sweden
Cederberg C, Mattsson B (2000): Life Cycle Assessment of milk production—A comparison of conventional and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 8 (1) 49–60
CORINAIR (1996): The EMEP/CORINAIR Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook (CORINAIR 90). European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark
Davis J, Haglund C (1999): Life cycle Inventory (LCI) of Fertiliser Production. SIK-Report No 654, SIK, The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Sweden
Ekvall T (1999): System expansion and allocation in Life Cycle Assessment. PhD Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Finnveden G, Andersson-Sköld Y, Samuelsson M-O, Zetterberg L, Lindfors L-G (1992): Classification (Impact Analysis) in Connection with Life Cycle Assessment—A preliminary study. The Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 172–231
Frees N et al. (1998): Life cycle assessment on packaging systems for beer and soft drinks. Technical Report 7: Energy and transport scenarios, Chalmers Industrial Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden and Institute for Product Development, Lyngby, Denmark
Høgaas Eide M (1998): Livsløpsanalyse for transport ogproduksjon av søt konsummelk (Life Cycle Assessment of transport and production of drinking milk). SIK-report No 639, SIK, The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Sweden (in Norwegian)
Høgaas Eide M, Ohlsson T (1998): A comparison of two different approaches to inventory analysis of dairies. Int J LCA 3 (4) 209–215
Høgaas Eide M, Angel H, Flatemo HO, Helgesen LI, Homleid JP, Jäger WR, Sauar BO, Skjørestad AJ (1999): Livsløpsanalyse av fire metoder for CIP-vask (Life cycle Assessment of four different CIP-methods). TINE Norwegian Dairies BA, Centre for Research and Development, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)
ISO (1998): Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis. ISO 14041:1998 (E) International Organization for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland
Koudijs E, Dutilh C (1998): Aquatic Ecotoxicity for Common Crop Protection Aids. Int J LCA 3 (4) 200–202
Lindfors L-G, Christiansen K, Hoffmann L, Virtanen Y, Juntilla V, Hanssen O-J, Running A, Ekvall T, Finnveden G (1995): Nordic Guidelines on Life-Cycle Assessment. Nordic Council of Ministers, Nord 1995-20, Copenhagen, Denmark
Mattsson B (1999): Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Agricultural Food Production. PhD Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden
Meeusen-van Onna MJG, Leneman H (1996): Toepassing van LCA voor agrarische produkten. LEI-DLO, den Haag, The Netherlands (in Dutch)
Mekel OCL, Huppes G, Huele R, Guinée JB (1990): Environmental effects of different package systems for fresh milk. Centrum voor Milieukunde, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands
Møller H, Høgaas M (1997): Livsløpsanalyse ved produksjon av kjøtt og melk (LCA of beef production—Assessment of combined production of milk/beef and self recruiting production of beef). OR 53.97, Østfold Research Foundation, Fredrikstad, Norway (in Norwegian)
Møller H, Vold M (1995): Livsløpsanalyse ved kjøttproduksjon—En vurdering av svine- Og lammekjøttproduksjon (Life Cycle Assessment of meat production, assessment of lamb and pork meat production). OR 53:95, Østfold Research Foundation, Fredrikstad, Norway (in Norwegian)
NAF (1998): NAF Veibok (NAF Road Map). Norges Automobil Forbund Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)
NILF (1995): Handbok for driftsplanlegging (Agricultural economic planning guide). Norwegian Agricultural Economic Research Institute Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)
Oterholm B, Løkkeberg Ø, Sundström G (1994): LivsLapsanalyse av ulike emballasjesystemer for konsummelkprodukter (Life Cycle Assessment of different milk packaging options). Centre for Research and Development, TINE Norwegian Dairies BA, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)
PK-Produkter (1997): Plantevernkatalogen 1997, PK Produkter AS, Rygge, Norway (in Norwegian)
Ponsford CA (1993): Life Cycle Inventory Analysis of Milk Packaging Options. Pira International, UK
Ruud SO, Skrattalsrud T, Ryntveit GO (1998): Transport og miljø i skognæringen: Skognæringens innog utgående transporter (Environmental impacts of transportation in the Norwegian forestry) Report 2a, Transportbrukernes Fellesorganisasjon, Skogavdelingen, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)
Rydberg T, Frankenhaeuser M, Lundahl L, Otto T, Swan G, Tanner T, Hanssen O-J (1995): LCA of the Tetra Brik milk packaging system. CIT 1995:3, Chalmers Industrial Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Rydberg T (1997): Personal communication. Volvo Technical Development, Göteborg, Sweden. In: LCAiT (software), Chalmers Industrial Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Sandgren J, Heie A, Sverud T (1996): Utslipp ved håndtering av kommunalt avfall (Emissions from treatment of municipal solid waste). SFT, Norwegian Pollution Control Authority, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)
Solgaard RT (2000): Miljørapport TINE Meieriene 1999 (Environmental Report of TINE Dairies 1999). TINE Norwegian Dairies, Centre for Research and Development, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)
Tillman A-M, Baumann H, Eriksson E, Rydberg T (1991): Miljön och förpackningarna (Packaging and the environment). Statens Offentliga Utredningar 1991:77, Allmänna Förlaget, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish)
Torud E, Lang-Ree R, Rage A, Stoverud S, Sivertsen T, Ødegaard SA, Sørum H, Grave K, Austbø O, Grøndalen T, Aass RA, østerås O (1996): Strategier for å redusere forbruk av antibakterielle midler i storfeproduksjonen (Strategies to reduce the use of antibiotics in the cattle production). Norwegian Cattle Health Services, Ås, Norway (in Norwegian)
Weidema BP, Pedersen RL, Drivsholm TS (1995): Life cycle Screening of Food Products—Two examples and some methodological proposals. Danish Academy of Technical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
Personal Communications Homleid JP (1999): TINE Norwegian Dairies BA, Centre for Research and Development, Oslo, Norway, December 1999 Svensen T (2000): Norske Skog, Hurum, Norway, January 2000
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eide, M.H. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of industrial milk production. Int J LCA 7, 115–126 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978855
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978855