Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of two different approaches to inventory analysis of dairies

  • LCA Case Studies
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two different methods for Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) applied to the dairy industry was performed at two dairies. In the simplified method, total environmental loads from a dairy was registred and allocated to liquid milk. Energy and emissions are measured for each process step for the detailed method. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages. The simplified method captures all energy and emissions of dairy processing, but treats the dairy as a “black box”. The energy consumption was found to be 1, 27 MJ/1 and 2,55 MJ/1 for the two dairies. By use of the detailed method it is easy to “loose” information, and it is very time consuming. The energy consumption was lower than for the simplified method. The environmental loads can on the other hand be divided on the different process steps. The main conclusion is that choice of method depends on the purpose of the LCA-study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumann, H.,Ekvall, T.,Eriksson, E.,Kullman, M.,Rydberg, T.,Ryding, S-O,Steen, B.,Svensson, G., 1993: “Miljömässiga skillnader mellan återvinning/återanvending och förbränning/ deponering”, Stiftelsen Reforsk, Sweden (in Swedish)

  • Dalzell, J.M., 1994: “Food Industry and the Environment”, Chapman & Hall, Great Britain

    Google Scholar 

  • Glende, C., 1997: “LCA som beslutningsgrunnlag ved fordeling av kulturmelkproduksjon”, Department of Food Science, Agricultural University of Norway, Ås, Norway (in Norwegian)

  • Grøtan, M., 1996: “Livsløpsanalyse ved produksjon av kulturmelk”, Department of Food Science, Agricultural University of Norway, As, Norway (in Norwegian)

  • Høgaas, M., 1998: “Livsløpsanalyse for transport og produksjon av søt konsummelk”, SIK-rapport, The Swedish Institute of Food and Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden (in Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 1997: “Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework”, International Standard ISO 14040

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 1997: “Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Goal and Scope definition and inventory analysis”, Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 14040

  • Lindfors, L-G.,Christiansen, K.,Hoffman, L.,Virtanen, Y.,Juntilla, V.,Hanssen, O-J.,Rønning, A.,Ekvall, T.,Finnveden, G., 1995: “Nordic Guidelines on Life-cycle Assessment”, Nord 1995:20, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Mekel, O.C.L.,Huppes, G.,Huele, R.,Guinèe, J.B., 1990: “Environmental effects of different package systems for fresh milk”, Centrum voor Milieukunde, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands

  • Meeusen-van Onna, M.J.G., Leneman, H., Sleeswijk, A.W., Kleijn, R., van Zeijts, H., Reus, J.A.W.A., 1996: “Toepassing van LCA voor agrarische produkten. 4B: Ervaringen met de methodik in de case melkveehouderij”, Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden, Centrum voor Landbouw en Milieu, Landbouw Economisch Instituut (LEI-DLO), Den Haag, The Netherlands (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, H. andHøgaas, M., 1997: “Livsløpsnalayse ved kjøtt- og melkeproduksjon”, Stiftelsen Østfoldforskning, Norway, (in Norwegian)

  • Møller, H. andVold, M., 1995: “Livsløpsanalyse ved kjøttproduksjon”, Stiftelsen Østfoldforskning, Norway (in Norwegian)

  • Norwegian Dairies Association, 1995: “Optimalisering av vaskestasjoner”, Norwegian Dairies Association, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian)

  • Oterholm, B., Løkkeberg, Ø, SundstrÜm, G., 1994: “Livsløpsanalyse av ulike emballasjesystemer for konsummelkprodukter”, R& D, Norwegian Dairies Association, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian) Ponsford, C.A., 1993: “Life Cycle Inventory Analysis of Milk Packaging Options”, Pira International, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydberg, T.,Frankenhaeuser, M,Lundahl, L.,Otto, T.,Swan, G.,Tanner, T.,

  • Hanssen, O-J., 1995: “LCA of the Tetra Brik milk packaging system”, CIT 1995:3, Chalmers Industrial Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • SETAC, 1993: “Guidelines for Life cycle assessment, ’A code of practice’”, Brüssel, Belgium

  • Tillman, A-M.,Baumann, H.,Eriksson, E.,Rydberg, T., 1991: “Miljön och förpackningarna”, Statens Offentliga Utredningar 1991, 77, Miljödepartementet, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish)

  • Vorre, A., 1994: “Livsløpsanalyse av risgrøt”, Department of Food Science, Agricultural University of Norway, Ås, Norway (in Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidema, B.P., Pedersen, R.L., Drivsholm, T.S, 1995: “Life Cycle Screening of Food Products”, Danish Academy of Technical Sciences, Lyngby, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentralverband Schweizerischer Milchproduzenten, 1991: “Studie ‘Milchverpackungen’ Oekologie”, Switzerland (in German)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merete Høgaas Eide.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Høgaas Eide, M., Ohlsson, T. A comparison of two different approaches to inventory analysis of dairies. Int. J. LCA 3, 209–215 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02977571

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02977571

Keywords

Navigation