Skip to main content

The Role of Mineral, Living and Artificial Substrata in the Development of Subtidal Assemblages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Marine Hard Bottom Communities

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 206))

Abstract

The orientation of subtidal hard substrata has long been known to play a key role in the assemblage that develops and the assumption has been that the nature of the substratum plays a minor role in this regard. I examine the features of mineral, living and artificial surfaces that affect the development of sessile invertebrate assemblages and find evidence that not all hard substrata are equivalent. As an example, evidence is mounting that rock type can affect the structural complexity of the reef at a range of scales: from millimetres, due to mineralogical dissolution, to the km scale. Furthermore and rather surprisingly, mineralogical content may be an important structuring agent. A further exciting development in this field is the finding that surface microtexture provides antifouling defence for a broad range of taxa. As ecologists working on subtidal assemblages, the challenge facing us is to understand processes that underpin pattern in these systems, particularly on natural surfaces and at depths beyond SCUBA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson M, Berntsson K, Jonsson P, Gatenholm P (1999) Microtextured surfaces: towards macrofouling resistant coatings. Biofouling 14:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew NL (1993) Spatial heterogeneity, sea urchin grazing, and habitat structure on reefs in temperate Australia. Ecology 74:292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew NL, Choat JH (1982) The influence of predation and conspecific adults on the abundance of juvenile Evechinus chloroticus (Echinoidea: Echinodermata). Oecologia 54:80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayling AL (1983) Growth and regeneration rates in thinly encrusting demospongiae from temperate waters. Biol Bull 165:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock RC, Kelly S, Shears NT, Walker JW, Willis TJ (1999) Large-scale habitat change in a temperate marine reserve. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 189:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey-Brock JH (1989) Fouling community development on an artificial reef in Hawaiian waters. Bull Mar Sci 44:580–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Baine M (2001) Artificial reefs: a review of their design, application, management and performance. Ocean Coastal Manag 44:241–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes RSK, Calow P, Olive PJW, Golding DW, Spicer JI (2001) The invertebrates: a synthesis, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum C, Simon F, Meyer W, Fleischer LG, Siebers D, Kacza J, Seeger J (2003) Surface properties of the skin of the pilot whale Globicephala melas. Biofouling suppl 19:181–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bavestrello G, Bianchi CN, Calcinai B, Cattaneo - Vietti, Cerrano C, Morri C, Puce S, Sara M (2000) Bio-mineralogy as a structuring factor for marine epibenthic communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 193:241–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baynes TW, Szmant AM (1989) Effects of current on the sessile benthic community structure of an artificial reef. Bull Mar Sci 44:546–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell SS, McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR (1991) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell SS, Hall MO, Robbins BD (1995) Toward a landscape approach in seagrass beds: using macroalgal accumulation to address questions of scale. Oecologia 104:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bers AV, Wahl M (2004) The influence of natural surface microtopographies on fouling. Biofouling 20:43–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bers AV, Prendergast GS, Zurn CM, Hansson L, Head RM, Thomason JC (2006) A comparative study of the anti-settlement properties of mytilid shells. Biol Lett 2:88–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness MD, Leonard GH (1997) The role of positive interactions in communities: lessons from intertidal habitats. Ecology 78:1976–1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack JA (1991) Habitat structure and the design of artificial reefs. In: Bell SS, McCoy ED Mushinsky HR(eds) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 412–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourget E, DeGuise J, Daigle G (1994) Scales of substratum heterogeneity, structural complexity, and the early establishment of a marine epibenthic community. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 181:31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branch GM, Steffani CN (2004) Can we predict the effects of alien species? A case-history of the invasion of South Africa by Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 300:189–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CJ (2005) Epifaunal colonization of the Loch Linnhe artificial reef: influence of substratum on epifaunal assemblage structure. Biofouling 21:73–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler AJ, Connolly RM (1999) Assemblages of sessile marine invertebrates: still changing after all these years? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 182:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffey HM (1982) No effect of naturally-occurring rock types on settlement or survival in the intertidal barnacle Tesseropora rosea (Krauss). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 63:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffey HM (1985) Spatial and temporal variation in settlement and recruitment of intertidal barnacles. Ecol Mongr 55:313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter JW, Carpenter AL, Foster MS, Jessee WN (1985) Benthic succession on an artificial reef designed to support a kelp-reef community. Bull Mar Sci 37:86–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo-Vietti R, Albertelli G, Bavestrello G, Bianchi CN, Cerrano C, Chiantore M, Gaggero L, Morri C, Schiaparelli S (2002) Can rock composition affect sublittoral epibenthic communities? Mar Ecol 23:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerrano C, Arillo A, Bavestrello G, Benatti U, Calcinai B, Cattaneo-Vietti R, Cortesogno L, Gaggero L, Giovine M, Puce S, Sara M (1999) Organism-quartz interactions in structuring benthic communities: towards a marine biomineralogy? Ecol Lett 2:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabot R, Bourget E (1988) Influence of substratum heterogeneity and settled barnacle density on the settlement of cypris larvae. Mar Biol 97:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman FC, Williams SL (2002) Overexploiting marine ecosystem engineers: potential consequences for biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 17:40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell SD (2000) Floating pontoons create novel habitats for subtidal epibiota. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 247:183–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp DJ (1974) Factors influencing the settlement of marine invertebrate larvae. In: Grant PT, Mackie AN(eds) Chemoreception in marine organisms. Academic Press, London, pp 177–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp DJ (1976) Settlement responses in marine organisms. In: Newell RC(ed) Adaptation to environment: essays on the physiology of marine animals. Butterworth, London, pp 83–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp DJ, Barnes H (1954) The orientation and distribution of barnacles at settlement with particular reference to surface contour. J Anim Ecol 23:142–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AR (1996) Association among ascidians: facilitation of recruitment in Pyura spinifera. Mar Biol 126:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AR, Bremner J (1999) Potential antifouling natural products from ascidians: a review. In: Fingerman M, Nagabhushanam R, Thompson MF(eds) Recent Advances in Marine Biotechnology, vol III. Biofilms, bioadhesion, corrosion and biofouling. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, pp 259–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis AR, Butler AJ (1989) Direct observations of larval dispersal in the colonial ascidian Podoclavella moluccensis Sluiter: evidence for closed populations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 127:189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AR, Ward DW (2009) The establishment and persistence of species rich patches in a species poor landscape: role of a structure-forming subtidal barnacle. Mar Ecol Prog Ser (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis AR, White GA (1994) Epibiosis in a guild of sessile subtidal invertebrates in south-eastern Australia: a quantitative survey. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 177:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AR, Targett NM, McConnell OJ, Young CM (1989) Epibiosis of marine algae and benthic invertebrates: natural products chemistry and other mechanisms inhibiting settlement and overgrowth. In: Scheuer PJ (ed) Bioorganic Marine Chemistry, vol 3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 85–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis AR, Ayre DJ, Billingham MR, Styan CA, White GA (1996) The encrusting sponge Halisarca laxus: population genetics and association with the ascidian Pyura spinifera. Mar Biol 126:27–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AR, Fyfe SK, Turon X, Uriz MJ (2003) Size matters sometimes: wall height and the structure of subtidal benthic invertebrate assemblages in southeastern Australia and Mediterranean Spain. J Biogeogr 30:1797–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean TA (1981) Structural aspects of sessile invertebrates as organizing forces in a fouling community. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 53:163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean TA, Hurd LE (1980) Development in an estuarine fouling community: the influence of early colonists on later arrivals. Oecologia 46:295–301

    Google Scholar 

  • de Blok JW, Geelen HJ (1958) The substratum required for the settling of mussels (Mytilus edulis L.). Arch Neerl Zool jubilee vol, pp 446–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl R, Erwin DG(eds) (1983) Sublittoral ecology: the ecology of the shallow sublittoral benthos. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Faimali M, Garaventa F, Terlizzi A, Chiantore M, Cattaneo-Vietti R (2004) The interplay of substrate nature and biofilm formation in regulating Balanus amphitrite Darwin, 1854 larval settlement. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 306:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth EJ, Ellison AM (1996) Scale-dependent spatial and temporal variability in biogeography of mangrove-root epibiont communities. Ecol Monogr 66:45–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher WJ (1987) Interactions among subtidal Australian sea urchins gastropods and algae: effects of experimental removals. Ecol Monogr 57:89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster MS (1982) The regulation of macroalgal associations in kelp forests. In: Srivastava L (ed) Synthetic and degradative processes in marine macrophytes. W. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 185–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines SD, Roughgarden J (1985) Larval settlement rate: a leading determinant of structure in an ecological community. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:3707–3711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaines SD, Brown S, Roughgarden J (1985) Spatial variation in larval concentrations as a cause of spatial variation in settlement for the barnacle, Balanus glandula. Oecologia 67:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Turnes MS, Hay ME, Fenical W (1989) Symbiotic marine bacteria chemically defend crustacean embryos from a pathogenic fungus. Science 246:116–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glasby TM (2000) Surface composition and orientation interact to affect subtidal epibiota. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 248:177–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham KR, Sebens KP (1996) The distribution of marine invertebrate larvae near vertical surfaces in the rocky subtidal zone. Ecology 77:933–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groppelli S, Pennati R, Scari G, Sotgia C, De Bernardi F (2003) Observations on the settlement of Phallusia mammillata larvae: effects of different lithological substrata. Ital J Zool 70:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosberg RK (1981) Competitive ability influences habitat choice in marine invertebrates. Nature 290:700–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosberg RK (1982) Intertidal zonation of barnacles: the influence of planktonic zonation of larvae on vertical distribution of adults. Ecology 63:894–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosberg RK (1987) Limited dispersal and proximity-dependent mating success in the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri. Evolution 41:372–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guidetti P, Bianchi CN, Chiantore M, Schiaparelli S, Morri C, Cattaneo-Vietti R (2004) Living on the rocks: substrate mineralogy and the structure of subtidal rocky substrate communities in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 274:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond LS, Synnot RN(eds) (1994) Marine biology. Longman Cheshire, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlin MM, Lindbergh JM (1977) Selection of substrata by seaweeds: optimal surface relief. Mar Biol 40:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) The population biology of plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert RJH, Hawkins SJ (2006) Effect of rock type on the recruitment and early mortality of the barnacle Chthamalus montagui. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 334:96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills JM, Thomason JC (1996) A multi-scale analysis of settlement density and pattern dynamics of the barnacle Semibalanus balanoides. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 138:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills JM, Thomason JC (1998) The effects of scales of surface roughness on the settlement of the barnacle (Semibalanus balanoides). Biofouling 12:57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills JM, Thomason JC, Muhl J (1999) Settlement of barnacle larvae is governed by Euclidean and not fractal surface characteristics. Functional Ecol 13:868–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes SP, Sturgess CJ, Davies MS (1997) The effect of rock-type on the settlement of Balanus balanoides (L.) cyprids. Biofouling 11:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggett RJ (2007) Fundamentals of geomorphology. Rutledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP, Baird AH, Dinsdale EA, Moltschaniwskyj NA, Pratchett MS, Tanner JE, Willis BL (1999) Patterns of recruitment and abundance of corals along the Great Barrier Reef. Science 397:59–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP, Rodrigues MJ, Bellwood DR, Ceccarelli D, Hoegh-Guldberg O, McCook L, Moltschaniwskyj N, Pratchett MS, Steneck RS, Willis B (2007) Phase shifts, herbivory, and the resilience of coral reefs to climate change. Curr Biol 17:360–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley R, Holland DL, Crisp DJ (1984) Influence of oil shale on intertidal organisms: effect of oil shale surface roughness on settlement of the barnacle Balanus balanoide s (L.). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 82:231–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JBC (1977) Competition on marine hard substrata: the adaptive significance of solitary and colonial strategies. Am Nat 111:743–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan A, Lawler M, Halley V, Barrett N (2005) Seabed habitat mapping in the Kent Group of islands and its role in marine protected area planning. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 15:51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karieva PM, Bertness MD (1997) Re-examining the role of positive interactions in communities. Ecology 78:1945

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay AM, Keough MJ (1981) Occupation of patches in the epifaunal communities on pier pilings and the bivalve Pinna bicolor at Edithburgh, South Australia. Oecologia 48:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keough MJ (1983) Patterns of recruitment of sessile invertebrates in two subtidal habitats. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 66:213–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keough MJ (1984) Dynamics of the epifauna of the bivalve Pinna bicolor: interactions among recruitment, predation and competition. Ecology 65:677–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keough MJ, Downes BJ (1982) Recruitment of marine invertebrates: the role of active larval choices and early mortality. Oecologia 54:348–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keough MJ, Raimondi PT (1995) Responses of settling invertebrate larvae to bioorganic films: effects of different types of films. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 185:235–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keough MJ, Raimondi PT (1996) Responses of settling invertebrate larvae to bioorganic films: effects of large-scale variation in films. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 207:59–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott NA, Underwood AJ, Chapman MG, Glasby TM (2004) Epibiota on vertical and on horizontal surfaces on natural reefs and on artificial structures. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 84:1117–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler J, Hansen PD, Wahl M (1999) Colonization patterns at the substratum-water interface: how does surface micro-topography influence recruitment patterns of sessile organisms. Biofouling 14:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton J (1996) Patterns in ecology. Oikos 75:145–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenihan HS (1999) Physical-biological coupling on oyster reefs: how habitat structure influences individual performance. Ecol Monogr 69:251–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenihan HS, Peterson CH (1998) How habitat degradation through fishery disturbance enhances impacts of hypoxia on oyster reefs. Ecol Appl 8:128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim NSH, Everuss KJ, Goodman AE, Benkendorff K (2007) Comparison of surface microfouling and bacterial attachment on the egg capsules of two molluscan species representing Cephalopoda and Neogastropoda. Aquat Microb Ecol 47:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littler M, Taylor PR, Littler DS (1986) Plant defence associations in the marine context. Coral Reefs 5:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado M, Young CM (1998) Limits on the bathymetric distribution of keratose sponges: a field test in deep water. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 174:123–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariani S, Uriz MJ, Turon X (2005) The dynamics of sponge larvae assemblages from northwestern Mediterranean nearshore bottoms. J Plankton Res 27:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness KA (1989) Effects of some natural and artificial substrata on sessile marine organisms at Galeta Reef, Panama. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 52:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness KA, Underwood AJ (1986) Habitat structure and the nature of communities on intertidal boulders. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 104:97–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller MW (2002) Using ecological processes to advance artificial reef goals. ICES J Mar Sci suppl 59:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minchinton TE, Scheibling RE (1991) The influence of larval supply and settlement on the population structure of barnacles. Ecology 72:1867–1879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PG (1977) Inorganic particulate suspensions in the sea and their effects on marine animals. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 15:225–363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PG, Seed R(eds) (1985) The ecology of rocky coasts. Hodder and Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton KL, Creese B, Raftos D (2007) Spatial patterns of ascidian assemblages on subtidal rocky reefs in the Port Stephens-Great Lakes Marine Park, New South Wales. Mar Freshw Res 58:843–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda FP, Dearborn JH (1989) Community structure of macroinvertebrates inhabiting the rocky subtidal zone in the Gulf of Maine: seasonal and bathymetric distribution. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 57:147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson RR, McPherson R (1987) Potential vs. realized larval dispersal: fish predation on larvae of the ascidian Lissoclinum patella (Gottschaldt). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 110:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlik JR (1992) Chemical ecology of the settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 30:273–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Petraitis PS (1990) Direct and indirect effects of predation, herbivory and surface rugosity on mussel recruitment. Oecologia 83:405–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher CR, Butler AJ (1987) Predation by asteroids, escape response, and morphometrics of scallops with epizoic sponges. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 112:233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimondi PT (1988) Rock type affects settlement, recruitment, and zonation of the barnacle Chthamalus anisopoma Pilsbury. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 123:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relini G, Zamboni N, Tixi F, Torchia G (1994) Patterns of sessile macrobenthos community development on an artificial reef in the Gulf of Genoa (Northwest Mediterranean). Bull Mar Sci 55:745–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DE (1996) Patterns in subtidal marine assemblages associated with a deep-water sewage outfall. Mar Freshw Res 47:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DE, Fitzhenry SR, Kennelly SJ (1994) Quantifying subtidal macroinvertebrate assemblages on hard substrata using a jump camera method. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 177:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DE, Davis AR, Cummins SP (2006) Experimental manipulation of shade, silt, nutrients and salinity on the temperate reef sponge Cymbastela concentrica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 307:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR (1980) Effects of predation by fishes, competition, and structural complexity on the establishment of a marine epifaunal community. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 42:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiaparelli S, Guidetti P, Cattaneo-Vietti R (2003) Can mineralogical features affect the distribution patterns of sessile gastropods? The Vermetidae case in the Mediterranean Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83:1267–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebens KP (1985) Community ecology of vertical walls in the Gulf of Maine, USA: small scale processes and alternative community states. In: Moore PG, Seed R(eds) The ecology of rocky coasts. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 346–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Soniat TM, Burton GM (2005) A comparison of the effectiveness of sandstone and limestone as cultch for oysters, Crassostrea virginica. J Shellfish Res 24:483–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland JP, Karlson RH (1977) Development and stability of the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina. Ecol Monogr 47:425–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svane I, Petersen JK (2001) On the problems of epibiosis, fouling and artificial reefs, a review. PSZNI Mar Ecol 33:169–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd CD, Keough MJ (1994) Larval settlement in hard substratum epifaunal assemblages: a manipulative field study of the effects of substratum filming and the presence of incumbents. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 181:159v187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totti C, Cucchiari E, De Stefano M, Pennesi C, Romagnoli T, Bavestrello G (2007) Seasonal variations of epilithic diatoms on different hard substrates, in the northern Adriatic Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 87:649–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Twidale CR (1982) Granite landforms. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ, Anderson MJ (1994) Seasonal and temporal aspects of recruitment and succession in an intertidal estuarine fouling assemblage. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 74:563–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ, Chapman MG(eds) (1995) Coastal marine ecology of temperate Australia. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl M (1989) Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 58:75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl M (1997) Increased drag reduces growth of snails: comparison of flume and in situ experiments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 151:291–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl M, Hoppe K (2002) Interactions between substratum rugosity, colonization density and periwinkle grazing efficiency. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 225:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters LJ, Wethey DS (1996) Settlement and early post-settlement survival of sessile marine invertebrates on topographically complex surfaces: the importance of refuge dimensions and adult morphology. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 137:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters LJ, Miron G, Bourget E (1999) Endoscopic observations of invertebrate larval substratum exploration and settlement. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 182:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wethey D (1986) Ranking of settlement cues by barnacle larvae: influence of surface contour. Bull Mar Sci 39:393–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Witman JD (1985) Refuges, biological disturbance, and rocky subtidal structure in New England. Ecol Monogr 55:421–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witman JD, Dayton PK (2001) Rocky subtidal communities. In: Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Hay ME(eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 339–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Witman JD, Sebens KP (1990) Distribution and ecology of sponges at a subtidal rock ledge in the central Gulf of Maine. In: Rutzler K (ed) New perspectives in sponge biology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 391–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Young CM (1989a) Selection of predator-free settlement sites by larval ascidians. Ophelia 30:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young CM (1989b) Larval depletion by ascidians has little effect on settlement of epifauna. Mar Biol 102:481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young CM (1990) Larval ecology of marine invertebrates: a sesquicentennial history. Ophelia 32:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young CM, Chia F-S (1981) Laboratory evidence for delay of larval settlement in response to a dominant competitor. Int J Invert Reprod 3:221–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young CM, Gotelli NJ (1988) Larval predation by barnacles: effects on patch colonization in a shallow subtidal community. Ecology 69:624–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young R, Young A (1992) Sandstone landforms. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zobell CE (1939) The role of bacteria in the fouling of submerged surfaces. Biol Bull 77:302

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Martin Wahl for the opportunity to contribute this chapter and his patience when it was slow to materialise. He, Todd Minchinton and Kirsten Benkendorff provided insightful comments that substantially improved an early draft. Discussions with several geologists were useful in improving my understanding of how organisms may interact with rock type—special thanks to Leah Moore and Colin Murray-Wallace in this regard. Without the able assistance of Allison Broad this chapter would have been much more difficult to assemble, although any omissions or errors are my own. This represents contribution number 283 from the Ecology and Genetics Group at the University of Wollongong, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew R. Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, A.R. (2009). The Role of Mineral, Living and Artificial Substrata in the Development of Subtidal Assemblages. In: Wahl, M. (eds) Marine Hard Bottom Communities. Ecological Studies, vol 206. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/b76710_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics