Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a landscape approach in seagrass beds: using macroalgal accumulation to address questions of scale

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental investigation of drift macroalgal accumulation in seagrass beds was conducted to determine if the relationship between passively dispersed plant structure and the spatial arrangement of rooted macrophytes differed when examined across two spatial scales. Experiments were performed from December 1992 to April 1993 at four different sites in Tampa Bay, Florida, utilizing artificial seagrass units (ASUs) of uniform shoot length and density but with different areal dimensions [1 m2 (S) versus 4 m2 (L)]. Drift macroalgae were also collected from 1 m×1 m plots of natural seagrass at each of the experimental sites from November 1990 to May 1992 to determine the relationship between macroalgal abundance and structural characteristics of natural seagrass. Disproportionately higher amounts of macroalgae were captured in L compared to S plots suggesting that macroalgal accumulation does not scale up directly with the areal dimensions of ASU patches. Higher amounts of algae recovered in L plots is in accordance with patterns expected if algae accumulate in zones of attenuated water flow. Neither seagrass shoot density nor blade length could adequately describe the patterns of algal accumulation. These combined results suggest that explanations for trapping/retention of passively dispersed particles should extend beyond traditional measures of vegetation complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson VL, McLean RA (1974) Design of experiments: a realistic approach. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell JD, Westoby M (1986) Importance of local changes in leaf height and density to fish and decapods associated with seagrasses. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 104:249–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell JD, Steffe AS, Westoby M (1985) Artificial seagrass: how useful is it for field experiments on fish and macroinvertebrates? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 90:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell JD, Steffe AS, Westoby M (1988) Location of seagrass beds in estuaries: effects on associated fish and decapods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 122:127–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell SS, Hicks GRF (1990) Marine landscapes and faunal recruitment: a field test with seagrasses and copepods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 73:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell SS, Hall MO, Fonseca MS (1995) Evaluation of faunal and floral properties of seagrass beds in high and low energy regimes: a geographic comparison. In: Dyer KR, D'Elia CF (eds) Changes in fluxes in estuaries: implications from science to management. Olsen and Olsen Press, Fredensborg, Denmark (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Butman CA (1987) Larval settlement of soft-sediment invertebrates: the spatial scales of pattern explained by active habitat selection and the emerging role of hydrodynamical processes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 25:113–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca MS, Fisher JS, Zieman JC, Thayer GW (1982) Influence of the seagrass, Zostera marina L., on current flow. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 15:351–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascon C, Travis J (1992) Does the spatial scale of experimentation matter? A test with tadpoles and dragonflies. Ecology 73:2237–2243

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray CA (1991) Demographic patterns of the palaemonid prawn Macrobrachium intermedium in southeastern Australia: spatial heterogeneity and the effects of species of seagrass. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 75:239–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller KJ, Anderson SA (1992) Interception of moving organisms: influence of patch shape, size, and orientation on community structure. Landscape Ecol 6:293–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall MO, Bell SS (1993) Meiofauna on the seagrass Thalassia testudinum: population characteristics of harpacticoid copepods and associations with algal epiphytes. Mar Biol 116:137–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland MM, Risser PG (1991) The role of landscape boundaries in the management and restoration of changing environments. Introduction. In: Holland MM, Risser PG, Naiman RJ (eds) Ecotones. The role of landscape boundaries in the management and restoration of changing environments. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist JG (1992) Disturbance, dispersal and patch insularity in a marine benthic assemblage: influence of a mobile habitat on seagrasses and associated fauna. PhD dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

  • Holmquist JG (1994) Benthic macroalgae as a dispersal mechanism for fauna: influence of a marine tumbleweed. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 180:235–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Irlandi EA (1994) Large and small scale effects of habitat structure on rates of predation: how percent cover of seagrass affects rates of predation and siphon nipping on an infaunal bivalve. Oecologia 98:176–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AR, Wiens JA, Milne BT, Crist TO (1992) Animal movements and population dynamics in heterogenous landscapes. Landscape Ecol 7:63–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern JC, Taghon GL (1986) Can passive recruitment explain harpacticoid copepod distribution in relation to epibenthic structure? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 101:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilar JA, Norris JN (1988) Composition export, and import of drift vegetation on a tropical plant-dominated, fringin-reef platform (Caribbean Panama). Coral Reefs 7:93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurdziel JP, Bell SS (1992) Emergence and dispersal of phytaldwelling meiobenthic copepods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 163:43–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis FG III (1987) Crustacean epifauna of seagrass and macroalgae in Apalachee Bay, Florida, USA. Mar Biol 94:219–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis FG III, Stoner AW (1983) Distribution of macrofauna within seagrass beds: an explanation for patterns of abundance. Bull Mar Sci 33:296–304

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil SE, Fairweather PG (1993) Single large or several small marine reserves? An experimental approach with seagrass fauna. J Biogeogr 20:429–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton TA, Mathieson AC (1983) The biology of unattached seaweeds In: Round FE, Chapman AOR (eds) Progress in phycological research. Elsevier, New York, pp 334–386

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neil RV, Johnson AR King AW (1989) A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale. Landscape Ecol 3:193–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth RJ, Heck KL Jr, Montfrans J van (1984) Faunal communities in seagrass beds: a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator-prey relationships. Estuaries 7:339–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins BD, Bell SS (1994) Seagrass landscapes: a terrestrial approach to the marine subtidal environment. Trends Ecol Evol 9:301–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Sogard SM (1990) Parameters of habitat quality for epibenthic fishes and decapod crustaceans in New Jersey estuaries. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

  • Virnstein RW, Carbonara PA (1985) Seasonal abundance and distribution of drift algae and seagrasses in the mid-Indian River Lagoon, Florida. Aquat Bot 23:67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MF, Crome FHJ (1989) Patterns of seed rain at the edge of a tropical Queensland rain forest. J Trop Ecol 5:301–308

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, S.S., Hall, M.O. & Robbins, B.D. Toward a landscape approach in seagrass beds: using macroalgal accumulation to address questions of scale. Oecologia 104, 163–168 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328581

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328581

Key words

Navigation