Skip to main content

Flood Modeling Using MIF Method with GIS Techniques: A Case Study of Iril River Catchment, Manipur, India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
River, Sediment and Hydrological Extremes: Causes, Impacts and Management

Abstract

In the present study, a multi-influencing factor (MIF) (geospatial model) is used for mapping and assessment of the flood-affected areas in the Iril River catchment of Manipur, India, for the period of 2015–2021. The study region is in the plain valley part of the state, which is frequently prone to flooding due to its topographical landscape and rapid urbanization in recent years. In the MIF method, a major and minor influence is used to inter-relate the parameters and weight is calculated by using MIF score formula. Six parameters were used in MIF method, that is , slope, soil type, drainage density, rainfall, topographical wetness index (TWI), and NDVI (normalized vegetation index). Then each parameter is reclassified into five subclasses and ranking of 1–5 (low to high) is assigned to each subclass of the parameters. The predicted flood-affected areas were divided into four categories: very low, low, moderate, and high. The study region was found to be mostly affected by low to moderate flood (approximately 97%) in every year of the study period (2015–2021), which may not be a cause for concern. However, in terms of the magnitude of flood caused by the high category (as compared to the other flood classes), it was observed that the flood-affected area was highest in 2015, at 33.6 km2 (1.13%), followed by 32.5 km2 (1.09%) in 2017. And lower flood risk is thus observed in 2019 (0.74%) and 2021 (0.79%), respectively. Particularly, the predicted results for the year 2015 were compared and validated with literature and collected data, and a similar flood pattern was observed in this year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajin RS, Krishnamurthy RR, Jayaprakash M, Vinod PG (2013) Flood hazard assessment of Vamanapuram river basin, Kerala, India: An approach using remote sensing & GIS techniques. Adv Appl Sci Res 4(3):263–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Anbarasu S, Brindha K, Elango L (2020) Multi-influencing factor method for delineation of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing and GIS techniques in the western part of Perambalur district, southern India. Earth Sci Inf 13:317–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-019-00426-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behera PK, Devi TT (2022) Study on Impact of Urbanization by SWAT Model in Iril River, Northeast India. In: Jha R, Singh VP, Singh V, Roy LB, Thendiyath R (eds) Hydrological modeling, Water science and technology library, vol 109. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81358-1_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Borah H, Deka S (2022) Exploration of potential zones of groundwater in Jamuna Watershed, Assam, by applying multi-influencing factor technique. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 51:75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstert A, Agarwal A, Boessenkool B, Crisologo I, Fischer M, Heistermann M, Köhn-Reich L, López-Tarazón JA, Moran T, Ozturk U, Reinhardt-Imjela C (2018) Forensic hydro-meteorological analysis of an extreme flash flood: The 2016-05-29 event in Braunsbach, SW Germany. Sci Total Environ 630:977–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danumah JH, Odai SN, Saley BM, Szarzynski J, Thiel M, Kwaku A, Kouame FK, Akpa LY (2016) Flood risk assessment and mapping in Abidjan district using multi-criteria analysis (AHP) model and geoinformation techniques, (cote d’ivoire). Geoenvironmental Disasters 3(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-016-0044-y

  • Das J, Umamahesh NV (2017) Uncertainty and nonstationarity in streamflow extremes under climate change scenarios over a river basin. J Hydrol Eng 22(10):04017042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das J, Umamahesh NV (2018) Assessment of uncertainty in estimating future flood return levels under climate change. Nat Hazards 93:109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das J, Umamahesh NV (2022) Investigating risk, reliability and return period under the influence of large scale modes, and regional hydrological variability in hydrologic extremes. Hydrol Sci J 67(1):65–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash P, Sar J (2020) Identification and validation of potential flood hazard areas using GIS-based multi-criteria analysis and satellite data-derived water index. J Flood Risk Manag 13(3):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdi SA, Ahmad SA, Saleh GJIA (2019). Analysis of basin geometry in Ataq Region, Part of Shabwah Yemen: using remote sensing and geographic information system techniques. Bull Pure and Appl Sci. 38 F (Geology), No.1, 2019: P.1–15, 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammami S, Dlala M, Zouhri L, Souissi D, Souei A, Zghibi A, Marzougui A (2019) Application of the GIS based multi-criteria decision analysis and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the flood susceptibility mapping (Tunisia ). Arab J Geosci 12:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauer C, Leitner P, Unfer G, Pulg U, Habersack H, Graf W (2018) The role of sediment and sediment dynamics in the aquatic environment. In: Riverine ecosystem management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73250-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • IMD (2022) Statewise rainfall information, a web report. Indian Meteorological Department

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarajapu DC, Rathinasamy M, Agarwal A, Bronstert A (2022) Design flood estimation using extreme Gradient Boosting-based on Bayesian optimization. J Hydrol 613:128341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman SN, Dawson RJ (2012) Issues and challenges in flood risk management—editorial for the special issue on flood risk management. Water 2012(4):785–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SI, Hong Y, Wang J, Yilmaz KK, Gourley JJ, Adler RF, Brakenridge GR, Policelli F, Habib S, Irwin D (2011) Satellite remote sensing and hydrologic modeling for flood inundation mapping in lake Victoria basin: implications for hydrologic prediction in ungauged basins. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 49:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM, Gao Y, Annandale GW, Morris GL, Jiang E, Zhang J, Cao Y, Carling P, Fu K, Guo Q, Hotchkiss R, Peteuil C, Sumi T, Wang HW, Wang Z, Wei Z, Wu B, Wu C, Yang CT (2014) Sustainable sediment management in reservoirs and regulated rivers: experiences from five continents. Erath’s Future 2(5):256–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechowska E (2018) What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements. Nat Hazards 94:1341–1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3480-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranagam JP (2012) Delineation of groundwater potential zones in Theni district, Tamil Nadu, using remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques. Geosci Front 3(2):189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangukiya NK, Sharma A (2022) Flood risk mapping for the lower Narmada basin in India: a machine learning and IoT-based framework. Nat Hazards 113(2):1285–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra R, Saha P, Das J (2022) Assessment of the performance of GIS-based analytical hierarchical process (AHP) approach for flood modelling in Uttar Dinajpur district of West Bengal, India. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 13(1):2183–2226. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2112094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munawar HS, Hammad AWA, Waller ST (2022) Remote sensing methods for flood prediction: a review. Sensors (Basel) 22(3):960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nsangou D, Amidou K, Zakari M, Ngoupayou JRN (2022) The Mfoundi watershed at yaoundé in the humid tropical zone of Cameroon: a case study of urban flood susceptibility mapping. Earth Systems and Environment 6(2):99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-021-00276-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouma OY, Tateishi R (2014) Urban flood vulnerability and risk mapping using integrated multi-parametric AHP and GIS: methodological overview and case study assessment. Water 6(6):1515–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey P, Tiwari SK, Pandey HK, Chaurasia AK, Singh S (2021) Identification of potential recharge zones in drought prone area of bundelkhand region, India, Using SCS-CN and MIF technique under GIS-frame work. Water Conserv Sci Eng 6:105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saikumar G, Pandey M, Dikshit PKS (2022) Natural river hazards: their impacts and mitigation techniques. In: River dynamics and flood hazards: studies on risk and mitigation. Springer, Singapore, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Senan CPC, Ajin RS, Danumah JH, Costache R, Arabameri A, Rajaneesh A, Sajinkumar KS, Kuriakose SL (2023) Flood vulnerability of a few areas in the foothills of the Western Ghats: a comparison of AHP and F-AHP models. Stoch Env Res Risk A 37(2):527–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02267-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, NM, Devi TT (2022) Assessment and Identification of drought prone zone in a Low Laying Area by AHP and MIF method: A GIS based study, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1084 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1084/1/012047

  • Singh L, Saravanan S, Jennifer JJ, Abijith D (2021) Application of multi-influence factor (MIF) technique for the identification of suitable sites for urban settlement in Tiruchirappalli City, Tamil Nadu, India. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci 5(3):797–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-021-00194-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha R, Bapalu GVS, L.K. and Rath, B. (2008) Flood risk analysis in the Kosi River basin, north Bihar using the multi-parametric approach of analytical hierarchy process (AHP). J Indian Soc Remote Sens 36(4):335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha J, Das J, Jha S, Goyal MK (2020) Analysing model disparity in diagnosing the climatic and human stresses on runoff variability over India. J Hydrol 581:124407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souissi D, Zouhri L, Hammami S, Msaddek MH, Zghibi A, Dlala M (2020) GIS-based MCDM–AHP modeling for flood susceptibility mapping of arid areas, southeastern Tunisia. Geocarto Int 35(9):991–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1566405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taheri K, Missimer TM, Taheri M, Moayedi H, Mohseni PF (2020) Critical zone assessments of an alluvial aquifer system using the multi-influencing factor (MIF) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) models in western Iran. Nat Resour Res 29(2):1163–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09516-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khundrakpam, S., Devi, T.T. (2023). Flood Modeling Using MIF Method with GIS Techniques: A Case Study of Iril River Catchment, Manipur, India. In: Pandey, M., Gupta, A.K., Oliveto, G. (eds) River, Sediment and Hydrological Extremes: Causes, Impacts and Management. Disaster Resilience and Green Growth. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4811-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics