Abstract
Mosquitoes are the most recognizable insects distributed throughout the globe including tropical and sub-tropical zones. Accurate and precise mosquito species identification is crucial in many prospects including developing species-specific vector control strategies. Mosquito vectors transmit various disease causative pathogens, our studies about them not merely desire to a complete taxonomic survey of their bio-fauna but also their consequences on human public health. Except for a few siblings or closely related species, mosquito taxonomy based on Linnaean classification has stagnated for more than a century at the stage of recognizing and naming different species. The Linnaean classification of mosquito species is certainly limited since it does not consider phenotypic plasticity, genetic variation of individuals including the morphological complexity, e.g. the occurrence of cryptic taxa or keys only developed for a certain gender or life stages. In recent times, the lack of experienced taxonomists demands the shifting of identification methods from Linnaeus to DNA-based approach such as DNA barcodes which are considered as a moot point in identifying mosquito vectors at their any life stages. At present, the genomic as well as mitochondrial genes are extensively utilized in the phylogenetic analysis of mosquito species. Moreover, the utility of a single even a partial mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence such as cytochrome oxidase I (COI/COX1) gene can be considered as the initial point for categorizing mosquito biodiversity. The mitochondrial genome appears to be highly suited for barcoding as it lacks introns and its maternal inheritance property is also beneficial for barcoding studies. Additionally, due to more conserved regions within species, the COI gene creates strong phylogenetic signals for accurate species identification. Often more than one marker such as mitochondrial along with nuclear genes is also used for species discrimination. However, DNA barcoding is not an end but it will boost the rate of species identification and it also solves the morphological ambiguity arises within species complex and also helps in discriminating the exotic species from endemic mosquito species. The unique contribution of DNA barcoding to mosquito taxonomy and systematics is a compressed timeline for the exploration of its diversity. Moreover, the molecular data are also widely used for producing molecular phylogenies such as phylogenetic, phylogeographic, population genetics and species identification studies. Phylogeography and genetic variation within the species provide knowledge about the origin and migration of the species which further contribute to vector surveillance and vector control strategy. Phylogenetic trees are also utilized to analyse gene duplication, estimating rates of diversification, polymorphism, recombination, population dynamics and inferring organismal phylogenies by combining it with other data sources. This chapter confers about problems associated with mosquito species complex and the implementation of DNA barcoding in their identification as well as the management process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Hussaini MT, Muhammed Ali AK, Al- Rubae HM (2013) PCR based identification of Culex pipiens complex (Diptera: Culicidae) collected in Al-Najaf governorate. Mag Al-Kufa Univ J Biol 5:177–186
Ashfaq M, Hebert PD, Mirza JH, Khan AM, Zafar Y, Mirza MS (2014) Analyzing mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) diversity in Pakistan by DNA barcoding. PLoS One 9:e97268
Azari-Hamidian S, Linton YM, Abai MR et al (2010) Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) fauna of the Iranian islands in the Persian Gulf. J Nat History 44:913–925
Baimai V (1969) Karyotype variation in Drosophila birchii. Chromosoma 27:381–394
Baimai V (1988) Population cytogenetics of the malaria vector Anopheles leucosphyrus group. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Pub Hlth 19:668–680
Batovska J, Blacket MJ, Brown K, Lynch SE (2016) Molecular identification of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in southeastern Australia. Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2095
Beebe NW, Cooper RD, Morrison DA, Ellis JT (2000) A phylogenetic study of the Anopheles punctulatus group of malaria vectors comparing rDNA sequence alignments derived from the mitochondrial and nuclear small ribosomal subunits. Mol Phylogenet Evol 17(3):430–436. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2000.085
Brown WM, George M, Wilson AC (1979) Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76:1967–1971
Chan A, Chiang L, Hapuarachchi HC, Tan C, Pang S, Lee R et al (2014) DNA barcoding: complementing morphological identification of mosquito species in Singapore. Parasit Vectors 7:569
Collins FH, Mendez MA, Rasmussen MO, Mehaffey PC, Besansky NJ, Finnerty V (1987) A ribosomal RNA gene probe differentiates member species of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Am J Trop Med Hyg 37:37–41
Coluzzi M, Sabatini A (1968) Cytogenetic observations on species C of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Parassitilogia 10:156–164
Coluzzi M, Sabatini A, della Torre A, Di deco MA, Petrarca V, (2002) A Polytene chromosome analysis of the Anopheles gambiae species complex. Science 298:1415–1418
Cook S, Diallo M, Sall AA, Cooper A, Holmes EC (2005) Mitochondrial markers for molecular identification of Aedes mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) involved in transmission of arboviral disease in West Africa. J Med Entomol 42(1):19–28
Cywinska A, Hunter FF, Hebert PDN (2006) Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Med Vet Entomol 20:413–424
Daravath SS, Siddaiah M, ReddyaNaik B (2015) Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Culex quinquefasciatus by DNA barcoding. Adv Entomol 3:118–124. https://doi.org/10.4236/ae.2015.33014
Delgado JZ, Castaño JC, Hoyos-López R (2015) DNA barcode sequences used to identify Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in La Tebaida (Quindío, Colombia). Revista Colombiana de Entomología 41(2):212–217
Djadid ND, Barjesteh H, Raeisi A, Hassanzahi A, Zakeri S (2006) Identification, sequence analysis, and comparative study on GSTe2 insecticide resistance gene in three main world malaria vectors: Anopheles stephensi, Anopheles culicifacies and Anopheles fluviatilis. J Med Entomol 43(2006):1171–1177
Engdahl E, Larsson P, Slund JN, Bravo M, Ander ME, Lundstrom JO, Ahlm C, Bucht G (2014) Identification of Swedish mosquitoes based on molecular barcoding of the COI gene and SNP analysis. Mol Ecol Resour 14:478–488
Fang Y, Shi WQ, Zhang Y (2017) Molecular phylogeny of Anopheles hyrcanus group members based on ITS2 rDNA. Parasites Vect 10:417. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2351-x
Farajollahi A, Fonseca DM, Kramer LD, Kilpatrick MA (2011) “Bird biting” mosquitoes and human disease: a review of the role of Culex pipiens complex mosquitoes in epidemiology. Infect Genet Evol 11:1577–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2011.08.013
Favia G, Dimopoulos G, Louis C (1994a) Analysis of the Anopheles gambiae genome using RAPD markers. Insect Molecular Biology 3(3):149–157
Favia G, Dimopoulos G, Torre AD et al (1994b) Polymorphisms detected by random PCR distinguish between different chromosomal forms of Anopheles gambiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91(22):10315–10319
Foley DH, Wilkerson RC, Cooper RD, Volovsek ME, Bryan JH (2007) A molecular phylogeny of Anopheles annulipes (Diptera: Culicidae) sensu lato: The most species rich anopheline complex. Mol Phylogenet Evol 43:283–297
Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299
Foster RG, Peirson SN, Wulff K, Winnebeck E, Vetter C, Roenneberg T (2013) Sleep and circadian rhythm disruption in social jetlag and mental illness. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 119:325–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-396971-2.00011-7
Garros C, Koekemoer LL, Cortzee M, Coosemans M, Manguin S (2004a) A single multiplex assay to identify major malaria vectors with the African Anopheles funestus and the Oriental An. minimus groups. Am J Trop Med Hygiene 70(6):583–590
Garros C, Koekemoer LL, Kamau L, Awolola TS, Van Bortel W, Coetzee M, Coosemans M, Manguin S (2004b) Restriction fragment length polymorphism method for the identification of major African and Asian malaria vectors within the Anopheles funestus and An. minimus groups. Am J Trop Med Hygiene 70:260–265
Gonzalez R, Carrejo N, Wilkerson RC et al (2010) Confirmation of Anopheles (Anopheles) calderoni Wilkerson, 1991 (Diptera: Culicidae) in Colombia and Ecuador through molecular and morphological correlation with topotypic material. Memorias do InstitutoOswaldo Cruz 105:1001–1009
Guany F, Alten B, Simsek F, Aldemir A, Linton Y (2015) Barcoding Turkish Culex mosquitoes to facilitate arbovirus vector incrimination studies reveals hidden diversity and new potential vectors. Acta Trop 143:112–120
Hackett BJ, Gimnig J, Guelbeogo W, Costantini C, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M, Collins FH, Besansky NJ (2000) Ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) sequences differentiate Anopheles funestus and An. rivulorum, and uncover a cryptic taxon. Insect Mol Biol 9:369–374
Hasan AUS, Suguri SM, Ahmed C, Fujimoto M, Harada SM, Rahman et al (2009) Molecular phylogeography of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes in central Bangladesh. Acta Tropica 112:106–114
Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2006) DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:968–971. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510466103
Harbach RE (2016) Mosquito Taxonomic Inventory. Accessible at http://mosquito-taxonomic-inventory.info
Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003a) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Royal Soc Lond Series B Biol Sci 270:313–321
Hemmerter S, Šlapeta J, Beebe NW (2009) Resolving genetic diversity in Australasian Culex mosquitoes: incongruence between the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I and nuclear acetylcholine esterase 2. Mol Phylogenet Evol 50:317–325
Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard J (2003b) Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergence, among closely related species. Proc R Soc Lond B (Suppl) 270:S962S99
Jiang F, Jin Q, Liang L, Zhang AB, Li ZH (2014) Existence of species complex largely reduced barcoding success for invasive species of Tephritidae: a case study in Bactrocera spp. Mol Ecol Resour 14:1114–1128
Jinbo U, Kato T, Ito M (2011) Current progress in DNA barcoding and future implications for entomology. Entomological Science 14:107–124
Kambhampati S, Black WC, Rai KS (1992) Random amplified polymorphic DNA of mosquito species and populations (Diptera: Culicidae): Techniques, statistical analysis, and applications. Journal of Medical Entomology 29(6):939–945
Karthika P, Vadivalagan C, Thirumurugan D, Kumar RR, Murugan K, Canale A, Benelli G (2018) DNA barcoding of five Japanese encephalitis mosquito vectors (Culex fuscocephala, Culex gelidus, Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Culex pseudovishnui and Culex vishnui). Acta Trop 183:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.04.006
Kipling WW, Rubinoff D (2004) Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics 20:47–55
Krzywinski J, Wilkerson RC, Besansky NJ (2001) Evolution of mitochondrial and ribosomal gene sequences in Anophelinae (Diptera: Culicidae): implications for phylogeny reconstruction. Mol Phylogenet Evol 18(3):479–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2000.0894
Kumar NP, Rajaval AR, Natarajan R, Jambulingam P (2007) DNA barcode can distinguish species of Indian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entmol 44(1):1–7
Laboudi M, Faraj C, Sadak A, Harrat Z, Boubidi SC, Harbach RE, Aouad RE, Linton YM (2011) DNA barcodes confirm the presence of a single member of the Anopheles maculipennis group in Morocco and Algeria: An. sicaulti is conspecific with An. labranchiae. Acta Trop 118:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.12.006
Laurito M, de Oliveira TMP, Almir WR, Sallum MAM (2013) COI barcode versus morphological identification of Culex (Culex) (Diptera: Culicidae) species: A case study using samples from Argentina and Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 108(Suppl 1):110–122
Lee Y, Seifert SN, Nieman CC, McAbee RD, Goodell P, Fryxell RT et al (2012) High degree of single nucleotide polymorphisms in California Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) sensu lato. J Med Entomol 49:299–306
Ling FY, Wang W (1997) A new karyotype of Drosophila albomicans. Acta Genet Sinica 24:496–500
Lyman DF, Monteiro FA, Escalante AS, Cordon-Rosales C, Wesson DM, Dujardin J, Beard CB (1999) Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation among Triatomine vectors of Chargas’ disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60(3):377–386. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.377
Ma Y, Li S, Xu J (2006) Molecular identification and phylogeny of the Maculatus group of Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Acta Trop 99:272–280
Marrelli MT, Sallum MA, Marinotti O (2006) The second internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA as a tool for Latin American anopheline taxonomy- a critical review. Mem Inst Oswal do Cruz 101:817–832
Manonmani A, Nanda N, Jambulingam P, Sahu S, Vijayakumar T, Vani JR et al (2003) Comparison of polymerase chain reaction assay and cytotaxonomy for identification of sibling species of Anopheles fluviatilis (Diptera: Culicidae). Bull Entomol Res 93:169–171
Meier R, Shiyang K, Vaidya G, Ng PK (2006) DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: 696 a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst Biol 55(5):715–728
Miller DD, Stone LE (1962) Reinvestigation of karyotype in Drosophila affinis Sturtevant and related species. J Hered 53:12–24
Murugan K, Vadivalagan C, Karthika P, Panneerselvam C, Paulpandi M, Subramaniam J, Wei H, Aziz AT, Alsalhi MS, Devanesan S, Nicoletti M, Paramasivan R, Parajulee MN, Benelli G (2016) DNA barcoding and molecular evolution of mosquito vectors of medical and veterinary importance. Parasitol Res 115:107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4726-2
Naddaf SR, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H (2012) Confirmation of two sibling species among Anopheles fluviatilis mosquitoes in south and southeastern Iran by analysis of cytochrome oxidase I gene. J Arthropod Borne Dis 6(2):144–150
Norris DE (2002) Genetic markers for study of the anopheline vectors of human malaria. Int J Parasitol 32:1607–1615
Paramasivan R, Dhananjeyan KJ, Selvaraj Pandian R (2013) A preliminary report on DNA barcoding and phylogenetic relationships of certain public health important mosquito species recorded in rural areas of south India. J Vector Borne Dis 50:144–146
Pennisi E (2003) Modernizing the tree of life. Science 300:1692–1697
Porter CH, Collins FH (1996) Phylogeny of Neartic members of the Anopheles maculipennis species group derived from the D2 variable region of 28S ribosomal RNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 6:178–188. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1996.0070
Pramual P, Wongpakam K, Adler PH (2011) Cryptic biodiversity and phylogenetic relationships revealed by DNA barcoding of oriental black flies in the subgenus Gomphostilbia (Diptera: Simuliidae). Genome 54:1–9
Puslednik L, Russell RC, Ballard JWO (2012) Phylogeography of the medically important mosquito Aedes (Ochlerotatus) vigilax (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australasia. J Biogeogr 39:1333–1346
Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2007) Bold: the barcode of life data system. Mol Ecol Notes 7:355–364. http://www.barcodinglife.org
Rosero D, Gutiérrez L, Cienfuegos A, Jaramillo L, Correa M (2010) Optimization of a DNA extraction procedure for anopheline mosquitoes. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 36(2):260–263
Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K (2006) A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for “barcoding” identification. J Hered 97:581–594
Ruiling Z, Peien L, Xuejun W, Zhong Z (2017) Molecular analysis and genetic diversity of Aedes albopictus (Diptera, Culicidae) from China. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2017.1325481
Ruiz F, Linton YM, Ponsonby DJ et al (2010) Molecular comparison of topotypic specimens confirms Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) dunhami causey (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Colombian Amazon. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 105:899–903
Ruiz-Lopez F, Wilkerson RC, Conn JE, McKeon SN, Levin DM, Quiñones ML, Póvoa MM, Linton YM (2012) DNA barcoding reveals both known and novel taxa in the Albitarsis Group (Anopheles: Nyssorhynchus) of Neotropical malaria vectors. Parasites Vect 5:44. http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/44
Saccone C, De Giorgi C, Gissi C, Pesole G, Reyes A (1999) Evolutionary genomics in Metazoa: the mitochondrial DNA as a model system. Gene 238:195–209
Shouche SY, Milind SP (2000) Sequence analysis of mitochondrial 16s ribosomal RNA gene fragment from seven mosquito species. J BioSci 25(4):361–366
Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved PCR primers. Ann Entomol Soc Am 87:651–701
Singh OP, Chandra D, Nanda N, Raghavendra K, Sunil S, Sharma SK, Dua VK, Subbarao SK (2004) Differentiation of members of the Anopheles fluviatilis species complex by an Allelespecific polymerase chain reaction based on 28s ribosomal DNA sequences. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70(1):27–32
Sirivanakarn S (1977) A revision of the subgenus Lophoceraomyia of the genus Culex in the oriental region (Diptera: Culicidae). Contrib Am Entomol Inst (Ann Arbor) 13:1–245
Smith JL, Fonseca DM (2004) Rapid assays for identification of members of the Culex (Culex) pipiens complex, their hybrids, and other sibling species (Diptera: Culicidae). Am J Trop Med Hyg 70:339–345
Stahls G, Vujic A, Perez-Banon C et al (2009) COI barcodes for identification of Merodon hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) of Lesvos Island, Greece. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1431–1438
Torres-Gutierrez C, Bergo ES, Emerson KJ, de Oliveira TMP, Greni S, Sallum MAM (2016) Mitochondrial COI gene as a tool in the taxonomy of mosquitoes Culex subgenus Melanononion. Acta Trop 164:137–149
Tyagi V, Sharma AK, Yadav R, Sukumaran D, Agrawal OP, Veer V (2015) Cytotaxonomic examination for identification of Anopheles culicifacies sibling species in Central India. J Mosquito Res 5(20):1–7
Vadivalagan C, Karthika P, Murugan K, Panneerselvam C, Serrone PD, Benelli G (2017) Exploring genetic variation in haplotypes of the filariasis vector Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) through DNA barcoding. Acta Trop 169:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.01.020
Versteirt V, Nagy ZT, Roelants P, Denis L, Breman FC, Damiens D, Dekoninck W, Backeljau T, Coosemans M, Van Bortel W (2014) Identification of Belgian mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) by DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12318
Wang G, Li C, Guo X, Xing D, Dong Y, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Liu M, Zheng Z, Zhang H, Zhu X, Wu Z, Zhao T (2012) Identifying the main mosquito species in China based on DNA barcoding. PLoS One 7:e4705
Wang G, Li C, Guo X, Xing D, Dong Y, Zhao T (2014) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the subgenera Anopheles and Celia (Diptera: Culicidae) based on nuclear ribosomal sequences. Afr Entomol 22(3):660–669. https://doi.org/10.4001/003.022.0323
Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PD (2005) DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:1847–1857
Weeraratne TC, Surendran SN, Reimer LJ, Wondji CS, Perera MDB, Walton C, Parakrama Karunaratne SHP (2017) Molecular characterization of Anopheline (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes from eight geographical locations of Sri Lanka. Malar J. 16:234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1876-y
Weeraratne TC, Surendran SN, Walton C, Parakrama Karunaratne SHP (2018) Genetic diversity and population structure of malaria vector mosquitoes Anopheles subpictus, Anopheles peditaeniatus and Anopheles vagus in five districts of Sri Lanka. Malar J 17:271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2419-x
Wilkerson RC, Reinert JF, Li C (2004) Ribosomal DNA ITS2 sequences differentiate six species in the Anopheles crucians complex (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 41:392–401
Wilson FD, Wheeler MR, Harget M, Kambysellis M (1969) Cytogenetic relations in the Drosophila nasuta subgroup of the immigrans group of species. Univ Tex Publs 6918:207–253
Witt JD, Threloff DL, Hebert PD (2006) DNA barcoding reveals extraordinary cryptic diversity in an amphipod genus: Implications for desert spring conservation. Mol Ecol 15:3073–3082
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Panda, D., Barik, T.K. (2020). Unravelling Mosquito Species Complex Through DNA Barcodes: Complementing Morphological Identification for Accurate Discrimination. In: Barik, T.K. (eds) Molecular Identification of Mosquito Vectors and Their Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9456-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9456-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9455-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9456-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)