Abstract
Abiotic stresses are the major prevailing forms of environmental contaminants that result in harmful effects in plants and cause foremost environmental problems globally. A general effect of abiotic stress is the extreme accumulation of reactive oxygen species that can cause lipid peroxidation, oxidation of protein, inactivation of enzymes, DNA damage and interact with other imperative constituents of plant cells. Higher plants have evolved an intricate antioxidant defence system to scavenge reactive oxygen species during abiotic stress conditions. Genome editing approaches propose numerous applications in the improvement of crops towards abiotic stress tolerance, and produce quality improvement. Utilizing transgenic approaches, functional validation of several target genes engage in different processes, viz signalling, transcription, homeostasis, antioxidant defence for enhanced abiotic stress resistance has been employed in different plants including Brassicaceae crop plants. This chapter provides an inclusive outline to illustrate the interest of researchers for a better understanding of genome editing advancements in relation to abiotic stress tolerance in different Brassicaceae crops.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bidhan R, Noren SK, Asit BM, Asit KB (2011) Genetic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in agricultural crops. Biotechnology 10:1–22
Boch J, Scholze H, Schornack S et al (2009) Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science 326:1509–1512
Bortesi L, Fischer R (2015) The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol Adv 33:41–52
Cathomen T, Keith Joung J (2008) Zinc-finger nucleases: the next generation emerges. Mol Ther 16:1200–1207
Char SN, Neelakandan AK, Nahampun H, Frame B, Main M, Spalding MH, Becraft PW, Meyers BC, Walbot V, Wang K et al (2017) An agrobacterium-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 system for high-frequency targeted mutagenesis in maize. Plant Biotechnol J 15:257–268
Christian M, Cermak T, Doyle EL et al (2010) Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics 186:757–761
Christian ML, Demorest ZL, Starker CG et al (2012) Targeting G with TAL effectors: a comparison of activities of TALENs constructed with NN and NK repeat variable Di-residues. PLoS ONE 7:e45383
Cong L, Zhou RH, Kuo Y-C, Cunniff M, Zhang F (2012) Comprehensive interrogation of natural TALE DNA-binding modules and transcriptional repressor domains. Nat Commun 3:968
Eid A, Alshareef S, Mahfouz MM (2018) CRISPR base editors: genome editing without double-stranded breaks. Biochem J 475:1955–1964
Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF III (2013) ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 31:397–405
Gao W, Long L, Tian X, Xu F, Liu J, Singh PK, Botella JR, Song C (2017) Genome editing in cotton with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Front Plant Sc 8:1364
Gilbert LA, Larson MH, Morsut L, Liu Z, Brar GA, Torres SE, Stern-Ginossar N, Brandman O, Whitehead EH, Doudna JA, Lim WA, Weissman JS, Qi LS (2013) CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 154:442–451
Golldack D, Lüking I, Yang O (2011) Plant tolerance to drought and salinity: stress regulating transcription factors and their functional significance in the cellular transcriptional network. Plant Cell Rep 30:1383–139110
Gong X-Q, Liu J-H (2013) Genetic transformation and genes for resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses in Citrus and its related genera. Plant Cell Tiss Org 113:137–147
Jankele R, Svoboda P (2014) TAL effectors: tools for DNA targeting. Briefings Funct Genomics 13(5):409–419
Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E (2012) A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Sci 337(6096):816–821
Kim Y-G, Cha J, Chandrasegaran S (1996) Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:1156–1160
Klap C, Yeshayahou E, Bolger AM, Arazi T, Gupta SK, Shabtai S, Usadel B, Salts Y, Barg R (2017) Tomato facultative parthenocarpy results from SlAGAMOUS-LIKE 6 loss of function. Plant Biotechnol J 15:634–647
Kumar S, Andy A (2012) Health promoting bioactive phytochemicals from Brassica. Int Food Res J 19:141–152.
Kuzuoglu-Ozturk D, Cebeci Yalcinkaya O, Akpinar BA et al (2012) Autophagy-related gene, TdAtg8, in wild emmer wheat plays a role in drought and osmotic stress response. Planta 236:1081–1092
Lamb BM, Mercer AC, Barbas CF III (2013) Directed evolution of the TALE N-terminal domain for recognition of all 50 bases. Nucleic Acids Res 41:9779–9785
Lorraine S, Symington, Gautier J (2011) Double-Strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu Rev Genet 45(1):247–271
Mahas A, Mahfouz M (2018) Engineering virus resistance via CRISPR–Cas systems. CurrOpin Virol 32:1–8
Mak AN-S, Bradley P, Cernadas RA, Bogdanove AJ, Stoddard BL (2012) The crystal structure of TAL effector PthXo1 bound to its DNA target. Science 335:716–719
Mao Y, Zhang H, Xu N, Zhang B, Gou F, Zhu J-K (2013) Application of the CRISPR–Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol Plant 6:2008–2011
Miao J, Guo D, Zhang J, Huang Q, Qin G, Zhang X, Wan J, Gu H, Qu LJ (2013) Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Res 23:1233–1236
Möellers C (2017) Quality aspects in breeding Brassica species, in Brassica 2017: VII International Symposium on Brassicas, Pontevedra
Mickelbart MV, Hasegawa PM, Bailey-Serres J (2015) Genetic mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance that translate to crop yield stability. Nat Rev Genet 16:237
Nemudryi AA, Valetdinova KR, Medvedev SP, Zakian SM (2014) TALEN and CRISPR/Cas genome editing systems: tools of discovery. Acta Naturae 6(3):19–40
Osakabe K, Osakabe Y, Toki S (2010) Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis using custom-designed zinc finger nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:12034–12039
Pabo CO, Peisach E, Grant RA (2001) Design and selection of novel Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 70:313–340
Palpant NJ, Dudzinski D (2013) Zinc finger nucleases: looking toward translation. Gene Ther 20:121–127
Pandey P, Irulappan V, Bagavathiannan MV, Senthil-Kumar M (2017) Impact of combined abiotic and biotic stresses on plant growth and avenues for crop improvement by exploiting physio-morphological traits. Front Plant Sci 8:537
Pavletich NP, Pabo CO (1991) Zinc finger-DNA recognition: crystal structure of a Zif268-DNAcomplex at 2.1 A. Science 252:809–817
Puchta H (2016) Using CRISPR/Cas in three dimensions: towards synthetic plant genomes, transcriptomes and epigenomes. Plant J 87:5–15
Römer P, Hahn S, Jordan T, Strauß T, Bonas U, Lahaye T (2007) Plant pathogen recognition mediated by promoter activation of the pepper Bs3 resistance gene. Science 318: 645–648
RodrÃguez-Leal D, Lemmon ZH, Man J, Bartlett ME, Lippman ZB (2017) Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing. Cell 171:470–480
Schornack S, Meyer A, Römer P, Jordan T, Lahaye T (2006) Gene-for-gene-mediated recognition of nuclear-targeted AvrBs3-like bacterial effector proteins. J Plant Physiol 163: 256–272
Shukla VK, Doyon Y, Miller JC et al (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459:437–441
Singh KB, Foley RC, Oñate-Sánchez L (2002) Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:430–436
Streubel J, Blücher CA, Landgraf, Boch J (2012) TAL effector RVD specificities and efficiencies. Nat Biotechnol 30: 593–595
Townsend JA, Wright DA, Winfrey RJ et al (2009) High frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nature 459(442–445):2009
Wang W, Akhunova A, Chao S, Akhunov E (2016) Optimizing multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing for wheat. BioRxiv 051342
Weeks DP, Spalding MH, Yang B (2016) Use of designer nucleases for targeted gene and genome editing in plants. Plant Biotechnol J 14:483–495
Xiong J, Ding J, Li Y (2015) Genome-editing technologies and their potential application in horticultural crop breeding. Hortic Res 2:15019
Zafar SA, Zaidi SS, Gaba Y, Pareek SLS, Dhanhker OP, Li X, Mansoor S, Pareek A (2019) Engineering abiotic stress tolerance via CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing. J Exp Bot. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz476
Zhang F, Maeder ML, Unger-Wallaced E et al (2010) High frequency targeted mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using zinc finger nucleases. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 107:12028–12033
Zhang M, Zhao J, Li L, Gao Y, Zhao L, Patil SB, Fang J, Zhang W, Yang Y, Li M et al (2017) The Arabidopsis U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase PUB30 negatively regulates salt tolerance by facilitating BRI1 kinase inhibitor 1 (BKI1) degradation. Plant, Cell Environ 40:2831–2843
Zhang, Y, Li S, Xue S, Yang S, Huang J, Wang, L (2018). Phylogenetic and CRISPR/Cas9 studies in deciphering the evolutionary trajectory and phenotypic impacts of rice ERECTA genes. Front Plant Sci 9:473.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00473
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jalil, S.U., Ansari, M.I. (2020). Genome Editing for the Improvement of Brassicaceae for Abiotic Stress Tolerance. In: Hasanuzzaman, M. (eds) The Plant Family Brassicaceae. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6345-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6345-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6344-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6345-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)