Skip to main content

Abstracts of Selected Posters

  • Chapter
Chromosomes Today
  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

The analysis of chromosomes of mouse embryos permits detection of transmitted chromosome damage. The protocol involves the treatment of one parent (usually the male) with a clastogen, recovery of embryos and preparation of chromosomes for metaphase analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. A. de Klein et al., Nature 300, 765–767, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Granzow and K. Nielsen (1983): J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 105. A37.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buys CHCM, Koerts T, Aten JA, Hum Genet 61(1982)157

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aten JA Stap J, van der Veen AY, Buys CHCM, Abstr 6th Int Symp Flow Cytometry 1982: 254

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aten JA, Yu L-C, Lucas JC, Gray JW, Basic Appl Histochem 24(1980)341.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Whang-Peng J., Bunn J., Kao-Shan C.S., Lee E.C., Carney, D.N., Gazdar A., Minna, J.D., Cancer Genet Cytogenet 6(1982)119

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bergh, J., Larsson, E., Zech, L., Nilsson, K. Acta Path Microbiol Immunol Scand 90 (1982) 149.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matthey, R. (1971)–Boll. Zool. 38:183–186. Petter, F. & Trainer, M. (1975)–Mammalia 39: 405–414.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Delhanty, J.D.A. et al., 1983. Chromosome instability in lymphocytes, fibroblasts and colon epithelial-like cultures from patients with Familial Polyposis Coli. Cancer Genet. & Cytogenet. 8: 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans, E.P. & Phillips, R.J.S., 1975. Inversion heterozygosity and the origin of XO daughters of Bpa/+ female mice. Nature, Vol. 256, pp. 40–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ford, J.H. & lester, P. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 33: 327–332 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. White, M.J.D. 1973. Animal cytology and evolution. Third Edition, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gebhart E: Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and structural chromosome aberration in mutagenicity testing. Hum. Genet. 58 (1981) 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goyanes, V.J. 1977. Hum. Genet. 40, 205–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Howell, W.M. and Hsu, T.C. 1979. Chromosoma 73, 61–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Demartino, E. Capanna, M.R. Nicotia and P.G. Natali, Cell Tissue Res. 213 (1980) 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holmquist, G., Gray, M., Porter, T., Jordan, J. 1982. Cell 32, 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kerem, B., Goitein, R., Richler, C., Marcus, M. and Cedar, H. 1983 (Nature, in press). Supported by grants from the Israel Academy of Sciences & Humanities, N.I.H. GM20483 and D.F.G. Sp 144/9–2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chamberlin, J., Magenis, R.E. 1980. Parental Origin of de novo Chromosomal Rearrangements, Human Genetics. 53, 343–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Solari J.A., Chromosome 81: 315–337 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dutrillaux B. 1979. Chromosomal evolution in primates: tentative phylogeny from Microcebus murìnus (prosimian) to man. Hum. Genet. 48, 251–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Linder, D; Kaiser-McCaw, B; Hecht, F. 1975 N.Eng.J.Med. 292: 6366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carritt, B; Parrington J.M; Welch, H.M; Povey, S. 1982 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 7400–7404.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parrington, J.M; West, L.F. and Povey, S. 1983. Manuscript submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Patil, S.R. et al. 1978 Birth defects: Original Article Series, vol. XIV No. 6B, p. 297–301. National Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Froster-Iskenius U, Schwinger E, Weigert M, Fonatsch C (1982) Replication pattern in XXY cells with fra(X). Hum Genet 60: 278–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Howell RT, McDermott A (1982) Replication status of the fragile X chromosome, fra(X)(g27), in three heterozygous females. Hum Genet 62: 282–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Uchida IA, Joyce EM (1982) Activity of the fragile X in heterozygous carriers. Am J Hum Genet 34: 286–293.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bauman, J.G.J. and Van Duijn, P.: Histochemical J. 13 (1981) 723–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Prooijen-Knegt, A.C. et al.: Exp. Cell Res. 141 (1982), 397–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Grossbach U., and I. Streichhan (1981) Chromosome (Berl.) 82, 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Geraedts et al., Br. J. Haematol. 1980, 44, 569–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pedersen-Bjergaard et al., Blood 1981, 57, 712–723.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schvartzman, J.B. and Goyanes, V., Cell Biol. Int. Reps. 4, 415 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ohnuki, Y. 1968. Chromosoma (Berl.) 25, 402–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schwartzman, J.B., Cortés, F., Ldpez-Sfez, J.F. 1978. Exp. Cell Res. 114, 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sutherland (1979), Am. J. Hum. Genet. 31, 136–148

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sutherland (1982), Am. J. Hum. Genet. 34, 452–458.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nordheim et al. (1981) Nature 294, 417;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lemeunier et al. (1982) Exp. Cell Res. 141, 508;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lemeunier et al. (1983) Cell 32, 435;

    Google Scholar 

  42. Viegas-Péquignot et al. (1982) Ann. Génét. 25, 218;

    Google Scholar 

  43. egas-Péquignot et al. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 5890;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Couturier et al. (1981) Biochimie 64, 443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Prakken, R. and Müntzing, A. 1942. A meiotic peculiarity in rye, stimulating a terminal centromere. Hereditas 28, 442–482.;

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lelley, T., Josifek, K. and Kaltsikes, J. 1978. Polymorphism in the Giemsa C-banding pattern of rye chromosomes. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 20, 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schempp and Vogel: Chromosoma (Berl.) 67, 193–199 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sutherland, G.R. and Eyre, H. 1981. Two unusual G-band variants of the short arm of chromosome 9. Clin. Genet. 19, 331–334.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Carson and Yoon. 1982. Genetics and evolution of Hawaiian Drosophila. In Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3b, pp. 299–341, Eds. Ashburner, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 The Organising Committee of the VIII International Chromosome, Conference, Lübeck

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Albanese, R. et al. (1984). Abstracts of Selected Posters. In: Bennett, M.D., Gropp, A., Wolf, U. (eds) Chromosomes Today. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9163-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9163-3_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-9165-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9163-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics