Skip to main content

Improving Governability – Reflections for Future Applications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governability of Fisheries and Aquaculture

Part of the book series: MARE Publication Series ((MARE,volume 7))

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is twofold. First of all, it presents the major scholarly discussions with regard to the features and systems in interactive governance theory, highlighting the concept of governability. Secondly, it aims to introduce examples from other scholarly work on interactive governance to illustrate where progress has been made and further reinforcement is needed. The author concludes that governability has not only proven to be a rich concept and a source for further theoretical work, but that it can also be fruitfully applied to societal sectors or systems such as fisheries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, J.C., Giesen, B, Münch, R., Smelser, N.J. (Eds.). (1987). The micro-macro link. Berkeley: University of California press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Doubleday, N. (Eds.). (2007). Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts, B., & van Tatenhove, J. (2005). Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms. Policy Sciences, 37, 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baechtiger, A., & Steiner, J. (2005). Introduction to special issue on political deliberation. Acta Politica, 40, 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bair, J. (2005). Global capitalism and commodity chains: Looking back, going forward. Competition and Change, 9(2), 153–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bair, J. (2008). Analying economic organization: embedded networks and global chains compared. Economy and Society, 37/3, 339–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M., & Salagrama, V. (2008). Assessing the governability of capture fisheries in the Bay of Bengal – A conceptual enquiry. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1), 13 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (1998). Linking social systems and ecological systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C. (Eds.). (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, R., & Tallieu, T. (2004). Multi-party learning as social learning for interdependence. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G.D. (1999). The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences, 32, 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J., & Williams, R. (2004). Interdisciplinary integration in Europe. Futures, 36, 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R.S., & Oosterveer, P. (2007). The missing link: Intersecting governance and trade in the space of place and the space of flows. Sociologia Ruralis, 47/4, 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. (2005). Knowledge, limits and boundaries. Futures, 37, 605–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, J.M., & Payne, S.L. (2003). Coping with paradox: Multi stakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sense making process for addressing messy problems. Business and Society. 42/1, 7–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee, R. (2011). Interactive governance for marine conservation: An illustration. Bulletin of Marine Science, 87(2), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2009). Governability assessment for fisheries and coastal systems: A reality check. Human Ecology, 37, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee, R., Kooiman, J., Pullin, R. (2008). Assessing governability in capture fisheries, aquaculture and coastal zones. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1), 20 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corning, P.A. (2002). The re-emergence of “Emergence”: A venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity, 7(6), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, S., & Norgaard, O. (2004). Conceptualising state capacity. Political Studies, 52, 685–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Noerberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30, 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Force, J.E., & Machlis, G.E. (1997). The human ecosystem part II: Social indicators in ecosystem management. Society and Natural Resources, 10(4), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar. London: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., & Korzeniewicz, M. (Eds.). (1994). Commodity chains and global capitalism. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, P. (2001). Upgrading primary production: A global commodity chain approach. World Development, 29(2), 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, P., Bair, J., Ponte, S. (2008). Governing global value chains: An introduction. Economy and Society, 37(3), 315–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C., Ostrom, E., Ahn, T.K. (1997). Scaling issues in the social sciences (IHDP Working Paper No. 1). Berlin: IHDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gragson, T.L., & Grove, M. (2006). Social science in the context of the long-term ecological research program. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, A. (2005). The role of spatial scale and spatial interactions in sustainable development. In M. Purvis & A. Grainger (Eds.), Exploring sustainable development (pp. 51–84). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., Ohlson, D., Arvai, J. (2006). Deconstructing adaptive management. Ecological Application, 16(6), 2411–2425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldspink, C. (2000). Contrasting linear and nonlinear perspectives in contemporary social research. Emergence, 2(2), 72–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, 1(1), 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M.S. (Ed.). (1997). Getting good government: Capacity building in the pubic sectors of developing countries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L.H., & Holling, C.S. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., & Light, S.S. (2006). Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the everglades ecosystem. Policy Sciences, 39, 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & McGinty, P.J.W. (2002). Social organization across space and time: The policy process, mesodomain, and breadth of perspective. In S.C. Chew & J.D. Knottnerus (Eds.), Structure, culture, and history (pp. 303–323). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood, B.W., & Gunn, L.A. (1984). Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, T., & Wallerstein, I. (1977). Patterns of development of the modern world-system. Review, 1(2), 11–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, T., & Wallerstein, I. (1986). Commodity chains in the world prior to 1800. Review, 10(1), 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H. (1995). Hidden order. Reading: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S. (2007a). Limits of governability? Institutional implications for fisheries and coastal governance. Marine Policy, 4, 360–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S. (2007b). In the power of power: The understated aspect of fisheries and coastal management. Human Organization, 66(4), 426–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., Friis, P., Kooiman, J., & van der Schans, J.W. (2009). Knowledge-based fisheries: Opportunities for learning. In J. Kooiman, M. van Vliet, S. Jentoft (Eds.), Creative governance: Opportunities for fisheries in Europe (pp. 239–259). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Bundy, A., & Mahon, R. (2010). Pyramids and roses: Alternative images for the governance of fisheries systems. Marine Policy, 34, 1315–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.S. (2006). Category, narrative and value in the governance of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy, 30, 747–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinski, R. (2001). Globalisation and unequalisation: What can be learned from value chain analysis. Journal of Development Studies, 327(2), 117–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, S. (1995). At home in the universe. London: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W.J.M. (1979). The organization of decision-making. Amsterdam: North Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Konefal, J., Mascarenhas, M., & Hatanaka, H. (2005). Governance in the global agro-food system: Backlighting the role of transnational supermarket chains. Agriculture and Human Values, 22, 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (1970). Besturen is beslissen. Meppel: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2008). Governability: Exploring a concept. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 10(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H.D., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and society. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maasen, S., Lengwiller, M., Guggenheim, M. (2006). Practices of transdisciplinary research. Science and Public Policy, 33(6), 394–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, R., Bavinck, M., Roy, R. (2005). Governance in action. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 351–374). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olowu, D. (2002). Capacity building for policy management through twinning: Lessons from a Dutch-Namibian case. Public Administration and Development, 22, 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). Transition towards adaptive management of water facing climate change and global change. Water Resource Management, 21, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. (1995). Public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S. (2002). The ‘Latte revolution’? Regulation, markets and consumption in the global coffee trade. World Development, 7, 1099–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammel, C., Stagl, S., & Wifling, H. (2007). Managing complex adaptive systems. Ecological Economics, 63, 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L.T. (2004). The globalization of organic agro-food networks. World Development, 32(5), 725–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S.W. (2007). Rethinking democratic deliberation: The limits and potential of citizen participation. Polity, 39(3), 335–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. (1999). New ecology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 479–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1983). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, A.M., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2010). Operationalizing governability: Case study of a Lake Malawi fishery. Fish and Fisheries, 11, 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellmer, A.J., Allen, T.F.H., Kesseboehmer, A. (2006). The nature of ecological complexity. Ecological Complexity, 3, 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitoun, M., & Mirumachi, N. (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Kooiman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kooiman, J. (2013). Improving Governability – Reflections for Future Applications. In: Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S., Kooiman, J. (eds) Governability of Fisheries and Aquaculture. MARE Publication Series, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6107-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics