Abstract
During the last few decades, both policy practices and policy idioms have drastically changed. Concepts such as interactive planning, network management, stakeholder dialogue, deliberative democracy, policy discourses, governance, etc. have replaced older ones such as public administration, policy programmes, interest groups, institutions, power, and the like. Although we recognise the relevance and importance of this shift in vocabulary, we also regret related ‘losses’. We particularly regret that the concept of power has – in our view – become an ‘endangered species’ in the field of public policy analysis. We therefore will develop a framework to analyse power – being a multi-layered concept – in policy practices in this article. We will do so on the basis of the so-called policy arrangement approach, which combines elements of the old and new policy vocabularies. In addition, we draw upon different power theories in developing our argument and model. As a result, we hope to combine the best of two worlds, of the ‘old’ and the ‘new’ idioms in policy studies, and to achieve our two aims: to bring back in the concept of power in current policy analysis and to expand the policy arrangement approach from a power perspective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrow, M. (1996). The Global Age. State and Society Beyond Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Arts, B. (1998). The Political Influence of Global NGOs. Case Studies on the Climate and Biodiversity Conventions. Utrecht: International Books.
Arts, B. (2002). ‘Green Alliances' of Business and NGOs. New Styles of Self-Regulation or ‘Dead-End Roads’? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9(1): 26–36.
Arts, B. and en P. Leroy, red. (2003). Verandering van politiek, vernieuwing van milieubeleid. Klassieke en post-moderne arrangementen. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.
Arts, B., M. Noortmann and B. Reinalda (eds.) (2001). Non-state Actors in International Relations. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Arts, B. and J. van Tatenhove (2000). ‘Environmental policy arrangements: A new concept,’ in H. Goverde (ed.), Global and European Polity? Organizations, Policies, Contexts. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 223–237.
Bachrach, P. and M. Baratz (1962). ‘Two faces of power,’ American Political Science Review 56: 947–952.
Baldwin, D. A. (2002). ‘Power and international relations,’ in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. A. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE, pp. 177–189.
Beck, U. (1994). ‘The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization,’ in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds.), Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Oxford: Polity Press, pp. 1–55.
Beck, U. (1996). ‘World risk society as cosmopolitan society? Ecological questions in a framework of manufactured uncertainties,’ Theory, Culture & Society 13(4): 1–32.
Beck, U. (1998). ‘Politics of risk society’, in J. Franklin (ed.), The Politics of Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 9–22.
Beck, U. (2000). ‘The cosmopolitan perspective: Sociology of the second age of modernity,’ British Journal of Sociology 51(1): 79–105.
Bourdieu, P. (1980). ‘Quelques propriétés des champ,’ in Dutch translation in Dick Pels (1989). Pierre Bourdieu. Opstellen over smaak, habitus en het veldbegrip. Amsterdam: Van Gennip.
Brouns, M. (1993). De homo economicus als winkeldochter. Theorieën over arbeid, macht en sekse. Nijmegen: SUN.
Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume I, The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford UK, Malden USA: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1997). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume II, Power of Identity. Oxford, UK; Malden, USA: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1998). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume III End of Millennium. Oxford, UK; Malden, USA: Blackwell.
Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of Power. London: SAGE.
Dahl, R. A. (1957). ‘The concept of power,’ Behavioral Science 2: 201–215.
Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Driessen, P. and P. Glasbergen (eds.) (2002). Greening Society. The Paradigm Shift in Dutch Environmental Politics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The Politics of the Earth. Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elias, N. (1970). Was ist Soziologie? München: Juventa Verlag.
Foucault, M. (1984). De wil tot weten. Nijmegen: SUN (Dutch translation of Histoire de la sexualité 1. La volonté de savoir. Parijs: Gallimard, 1976).
Frouws, J. (1993). Mest en macht. Een politiek-sociologische studie naar belangenbehartiging en beleidsvorming inzake de mestproblematiek in Nederland vanaf 1970, PhD Dissertation, Wageningen.
Gerth, H. H. and C. Wright Mills (eds.) (1982). From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Gibbins, J. and B. Reimer (1999). The Politics of Postmodernity. An Introduction to Contemporary Politics and Culture. London: SAGE.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.
Goehler, G. (2000). ‘Constitution and the use of power,’ in H. Goverde, P. Cerny, M. Haugaard and H. Lentner (eds.), Power in Contemporary Politics. London: SAGE, pp. 41–58.
Goverde, H. P., C. M. Haugaard and H. Lentner (eds.) (2000). Power in Contemporary Politics. London: SAGE.
Goverde, H. and J. van Tatenhove (2000). ‘Power and policy networks,’ in H. Goverde, P. Cerny, M. Haugaard and H. Lentner (eds.), Power in Contemporary Politics. London: SAGE, pp. 96–111.
Guzzini, S. (1993). ‘Structural power: The limits of neorealist power analysis,’ International Organization 47(3): 443–478.
Haas, E. (1990). Saving the Mediteranean. New York: Colombia UP.
Hajer, M. A. (2003). ‘De beleidsarrangementen-benadering en de institutionele leegte,’ in B. Arts en P. Leroy (ed.), Verandering van politiek, vernieuwing van milieubeleid. Klassieke en post-moderne arrangementen. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press, pp. 39–58.
Hajer, M. A. (2000). Politiek als vormgeving. Oratie, Universiteit van Amsterdam (in Dutch).
Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Held, D. (1989). Political Theory and the Modern State. Essays on State, Power and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the Global Order. From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hewson, M. and T. Sinclair (eds.) (1999). Approaches to Global Governance Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hocking, B. and M. Smith (1990), World Politics. An Introduction to International Relations, New York: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
Hoogenboom, B. (1998). Mexico and the NAFTA Environment Debate. The Transnational Politics of Economic Integration. Utrecht: Van Arkel/International Books.
Hooghe, L. and G. Marks (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, etc.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Keohane, R. O. and J. S. Nye (eds.) (1971). Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Keohane, R. O. and J. S. Nye (eds.) (1989). Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition. Glenview: Scott Foresman and Company.
Kickert, W. J. M., E. H. Klijn and J. F. M. Koppenjan (eds.) (1997). Managing Complex Networks. Strategies for the Public Sector. London: SAGE.
Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanisation of National Administrations. Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kumar, K. (1995). From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society. New Theories of the Contemporary World. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc.
Lasswell, H. D. and A. Kaplan (1950). Power and Society. A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Leroy, P. and J. van Tatenhove en B. Arts (2001). ‘Politieke modernisering en beleidsarrange-menten: een interpretatiekader voor vernieuwingen in het milieubeleid,’ Beleidsweten-schap 15(3): 209–228.
Liefferink, J. D. (1995). Environmental Policy on the Way to Brussels. The Issue of Acidification Between the Netherlands and the European Community. Wageningen: WAU.
Lowndes, V. (2002). ‘Institutionalism’, in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Sciences (second edition). New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 90–108.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power. A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
Marsh, J. G. and J. P. Olson (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis for Politics. New York.
Marsh, D. and R. A. W. Rhodes (eds.) (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nelissen, N., H. Goverde en N. van Gestel, red. (2000). Bestuurlijk vermogen. Analyse en beoordeling van nieuwe vormen van besturen. Bussum: Coutinho.
Putnam, R. D. (1988). ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics – the logic of 2-Level gGames,’ International Organization 42(3): 427–460.
Ray, L. R. (1987). Global Politics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Risse-Kappen, T. (eds.) (1995). Bringing Transnational Relations Back In. Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Risse, Th. (2002). Arguing and Persuasion in Multilateral Negotiations. Free University of Berlin: Unpublished paper.
Sabatier, P. A. (1987). ‘Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change,’ Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8(4): 649–692.
Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research (3rd ed.). Boulder, etc.: Westview Press.
Stone S. A., W. Sandholtz and N. Fligstein (eds.) (2001). The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Kersbergen, K. and F. van Waarden (2001). Shifts in Governance: Problems of Legitimacy and Accountability. The Hague: Social Science Research Council.
Van Tatenhove, J. (1999). ‘Political modernisation and the institutionalisation of environmental policy,’ in Marcel Wissenburg, Gökhan Orkan, Ute Collier (eds.), European Discources on Environmental Policy. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 59–78.
Van Tatenhove, J., B. Arts and P. Leroy (eds.), (2000). Political Modernisation and the Environment. The Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Van Tatenhove, J. (2001). ‘De meervoudige groene ruimte,’ in Henk de Haan, Tuur Mol en Gert Spaargaren (eds.), Het precaire evenwicht tussen distantie en betrokkenheid. Wageningen: WUR, pp. 98–113.
Tatenhove, J. and H. Goverde (2002). ‘Strategies in environmental policy. A historical institutional perspective’, in P. Driessen and P. Glasbergen (eds.), Greening Society. The Paradigm Shift in Dutch Environmental Politics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 47–63.
Van Waarden, F. (1992). ‘Dimensions and types of policy networks,’ European Journal of Political Research 21(1–2): February 1992: pp. 29–52.
Weber, M. (1964). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: The Free Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). ‘Communities of practice. Learning as a social system,’ in Systems Thinker.
Willets, P. (eds.), (1982). Pressure Groups in the Global System. London: Frances Pinter.
Woods, L. (1993). ‘Nongovernmental organizations and the United Nations System: Reflection upon the Earth Summit,’ International Studies Notes (1): 9–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arts, B., Tatenhove, J.V. Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms. Policy Sci 37, 339–356 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-0156-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-0156-9