Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the everglades ecosystem

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Everglades is an intensively managed ecosystem where control of the water has allowed agricultural, urban and economic development, while struggling to meet biodiversity conservation goals. The over 100 year history of control began in response to a disastrous series of floods and droughts followed by environmental crises at an ecosystem scale. Each of these events precipitated technological fixes that extended control of water resources. Institutional structures have been continually reorganized over the last century to meet shifting social objectives, the latest of which is ecosystem restoration. However, the basic response, which employs engineering and technological solutions, is a type of social trap, where governmental mandates, planning-based paradigms and vested interests all interact to inhibit the resolution of chronic environmental issues. Experience from other resource systems indicates that in such an inherently complex system wrought with multiple uncertainties, restoration must be discovered through experimentation and learning embraced by adaptive management. Though minimal steps towards adaptive management have been made, we argue that adaptive forms of experimentation and governance are needed to resolve chronic resource issues and achieve restoration goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, H.E., & Hobbs, R.J. (2004). Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “Lock-in Trap” of the Western Australian agricultural region. Ecology and Society, 9, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumen, N.G. (1995). History of human-related impacts to Lake Okeechobee, Florida (U.S.A.), Related Research, and Lake Management Issues. In N.G. Aumen & R.G. Wetzel (Eds.), Ecological studies on the littoral and pelagic systems of Lake Okeechobee, Florida (USA). Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebn. Limnol., vol. 45, pp. 1–16.

  • Berkes F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (Eds.) (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, H. (1980). Land into water, water into land history of water management in Florida. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blann, K., Light, S., & Musumeci, J. (2003). Facing the adaptive challenge. In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C. Folke (Eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change (pp. 210–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D., & Steelman, T.D. (2006). Beyond scientific management. In R.D. Brunner, T.D. Steelman, L. Coe-Juell, C.M. Cromley, C.M. Edwards, & D.W. Tucker (Eds.), Adaptive governance: integrating science policy and decision making. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D., Steelman, T.D., Coe-Juell, L., Cromley, C.M., Edwards, C.M., & Tucker, D.W. (2006). Adaptive governance: integrating science policy and decision making. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. (2000). http://www.cerp.org.Accessed November 2005.

  • Davis, S.M., & Ogden, J.C. (Eds.) (1994). The Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P.C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1902–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M.S. (1947). The Everglades, river of grass. Miami, FL: Pineapple Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S., & Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31, 437–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review Environmental Resources, 30, 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L.H. (1999). Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management. Conservation Ecology, 3, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L.H. (2001). Managing surprising ecosystems in Southern Florida. Ecological Economics, 37, 371–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L.H. (2003). Managing ecological crisis. In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C Folke (Eds.), Navigating natures dynamics – ecosystem institution linkages for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L.H., & Loftus, W.F. (1993). The Everglades. In W.H. Martin, S.C. Boyce, & A.T. Echternacht (Eds.), Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States (pp. 199–255). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., Light, S.S. (Eds.) (1995). Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L.H., & Holling, C.S. (Eds.) (2002). Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. (1992). Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. (1996). Engineering resilience vs. ecological resilience. In P.C. Schulze (Ed.), Engineering within ecological constraints (pp. 31–43). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S., Gunderson, L.H., & Walters, C.J. (1994). Synthesis chapter. In S. Davis & J. Ogden (Eds.), The everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S., & Meffe, G. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, D. (1994). Civic environmentalism: alternatives to regulation in states and communities. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.N. (1993). Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, S.S., & Dineen, W. (1994). History of water management in the Everglades. In S. Davis & J. Ogden (Eds.), The Everglades: The ecosystem and its restoration. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, S.S., Wodraska, J.R., & Sabine, J. (1989). The southern Everglades: evolution of water management. The National Forum, 8.

  • Light, S.S., Gunderson, L.H., & Holling, C.S. (1995). The Everglades: Evolution of management in a turbulent environment. In L.H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling, & S.S. Light (Eds.), Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, S.S. (2001). Adaptive ecosystem assessment and management: the path of last resort? In M. Jensen (Ed.), A guidebook for integrated ecological assessment. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (1999). Our common journey: a transition toward sustainability. Washington, DC: National Research Council, NAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (2003). Science and the greater Everglades ecosystem restoration: an assessment of the critical ecosystem studies initiative panel to review the critical ecosystem studies initiative. Washington, DC: National Research Council, NAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Hahn, T. (2004). Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a Wetland Landscape in Southern Sweden. Ecology and Society, 9, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, P., Gunderson, L.H., Carpenter, S.R., Ryan, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C., & Holling, C.S. (2006). Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1996). Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H.J., & Weber, R.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2005). Social traps and the problem of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S.R., Foley, J., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., Westley, F., & Brock, W. (2003). Slow response of societies to new problems: causes and costs. Ecosystems, 6, 493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schusler, T.M., Decker, D.J., & Pfeffer, M.J. (2003). Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, J.T., & Stiftel, B. (2005). Adaptive governance and water conflict: new institutions for collaborative planning. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science Coordination Team. (2003). The role of flow in the Everglades ridge and slough landscape. http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/sct_flows/. Accessed June 2006.

  • Volkman, J.M., & McConnaha, W.E. (1993). Through a glass, darkly: Columbia River Salmon, the endangered species act, and adaptive management. Environmental Law, 23, 1249–1272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C.J. (1986). Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C.J. (1997). Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems. Conservation Ecology, 1, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C.J., Gunderson, L.H., & Holling, C.S. (1992). Experimental policies for water management in the Everglades. Ecological Applications, 2, 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C.J., & Gunderson, L.H. (1994). Screening water policies for ecosystem restoration. In S. Davis & J. Ogden (Eds.), The Everglades: The ecosystem and its restoration. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F. 2002. ‘The Devil is in the Dynamic’. In L.H. Gunderson and C.S. Holling, (Eds.), Panarchy. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., Zimmerman, B., & Patton, M. (2006). Getting to maybe. Toronto, Canada: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lance Gunderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gunderson, L., Light, S.S. Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the everglades ecosystem. Policy Sci 39, 323–334 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-006-9027-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-006-9027-2

Keywords

Navigation