Abstract
It is widely recognized in mathematics education research that issues of social justice, democracy, inclusion or diversity are political in nature and extend beyond mathematics education. However, the great majority of mathematics education research lacks a theoretical understanding of how the problems it tries to solve are related with broader social and political structures in society. In this chapter, we will make a contribution to this understanding, by analyzing how social discourses and forms of ideology permeate the way mathematics education research engages with the issues of equity and quality. We base our reflections on theoretical tools drawn from the philosophy of Gert Biesta and Slavoj Žižek. Our argument is that exclusion and inequity within mathematics education and education in general are integral parts of current school education and cannot be conceptualized without understanding the relation between school education and capitalism as the dominant mode of social living.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In this context, the Lacanian notion of big Other stands for all the State, Justice and Law that give symbolic meaning to our social life.
References
Althusser, L. (1994). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). In S. Žižek (Ed.), Mapping ideology (1st ed. 1970, pp. 100–140). New York: Verso.
Althusser, L. (2000). Freud e Lacan/Marx e Freud. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Graal.
Baldino, R., & Cabral, T. (2006). Inclusion and diversity from Hegel-Lacan point of view: Do we desire our desire for change? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4,19–43.
Biesta, G. (2005). Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pædagogik, 25(1), 54–55.
Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.
Bishop, A. J., & Forgasz, H. J. (2007). Issues in access and equity in mathematics education. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1145–1167). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Boero, P. (2008). Autonomy and identity of mathematics education: Why and how to use external theories. To be published as part of the Proceedings of the 11 th International Congress on Mathematics Education. http://www.unige.ch/math/EnsMath/Rome2008/WG5/Papers/BOERO.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2010.
Cobb, P. (2007). Putting philosophy to work: Coping with multiple theoretical perspectives. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics and learning (pp. 3–38). New York: Information Age.
Gates, P., & Zevengergen, R. (2009). Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 161–170.
Goldin, G. (2008). Perspectives on representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 176–201). New York: Routledge.
Gutiérrez, R. (2007). (Re)Defining equity: The importance of a critical perspective. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 37–50). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Gutiérrez, R. (2008). A “gap-gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 357–364.
Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 37–73.
Knijnik, G. (1993). An ethnomathematical approach in mathematical education: A matter of political power. For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(2), 23–25.
Langrall, C., Mooney, E., Nisbet, S., & Jones, G. (2008). Elementary students’ access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 109–135). New York: Routledge.
Lubienski, S. (2002). Research, reform and equity in U. S. Mathematics education. Mathematical and Learning, 4(2 & 3), 103–125.
Lubienski, S. (2008). On “gap gazing” in mathematics education: The need for gap analyses. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 350–356.
Marx, K. (1989). A contribution to the critique of political economy (1st ed. 1857). http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1859/critique-pol-economy/appx1.htm. Accessed 13 Jan 2010.
Nasir, N., & Cobb, P. (2007). Introduction. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 1–9). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Niss, M. (1996). Goals of mathematics teaching. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 11–47). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Niss, M. (2007). Reflections in the state and trends in research on mathematics teaching and learning: From here to utopia. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1293–1312). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Pais, A., Stentoft, D., & Valero, P. (2010). From questions of how to questions of why in mathematics education research. In U. Gellert, E. Jablonka, & C. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 369–378). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
Schoenfeld, A. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13–25.
Silver, E., & Herbst, P. (2007). Theory in mathematics education scholarship. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics and learning (pp. 39–56). New York: Information Age.
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2008). Democratic access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Directions for the 21st century (2nd ed., pp. 415–438). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Stentoft, D., & Valero, P. (2010). Fragile learning in mathematics classrooms: Exploring mathematics lessons within a pre-service course. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogies. New perspectives for mathematics (pp. 87–107). Charlotte, USA: IAP.
Valero, P. (2004a). Postmodernism as an attitude of critique to dominant mathematics education research. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 35–54). Greenwich: Information Age.
Valero, P. (2004b). Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 5–24). Boston: Kluwer.
Valero, P. (2007). A socio-political look at equity in the school organization of mathematics education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(3), 225–233.
Valero, P. (2010). Mathematics education as a network of social practices. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. LIV-LXXX). Lyon: Institut National de Récherche Pédagogique.
Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (1991). For they know not what they do: Enjoyment as a political factor. London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (1994). The spectre of ideology. In S. Žižek (Ed.), Mapping ideology. London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2006). The parallax view. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Žižek, S. (2010). Denial: The liberal utopia. www.lacan.com. Accessed 20 Jan 2010.
Acknowledgment
This chapter is part of Alexandre Pais’ PhD study, supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal, grant SFRH/BD/38231/2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pais, A., Valero, P. (2010). Beyond Disavowing the Politics of Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education. In: Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., Valero, P. (eds) Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9802-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9803-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)