Skip to main content

Beyond Disavowing the Politics of Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education

Abstract

It is widely recognized in mathematics education research that issues of social justice, democracy, inclusion or diversity are political in nature and extend beyond mathematics education. However, the great majority of mathematics education research lacks a theoretical understanding of how the problems it tries to solve are related with broader social and political structures in society. In this chapter, we will make a contribution to this understanding, by analyzing how social discourses and forms of ideology permeate the way mathematics education research engages with the issues of equity and quality. We base our reflections on theoretical tools drawn from the philosophy of Gert Biesta and Slavoj Žižek. Our argument is that exclusion and inequity within mathematics education and education in general are integral parts of current school education and cannot be conceptualized without understanding the relation between school education and capitalism as the dominant mode of social living.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this context, the Lacanian notion of big Other stands for all the State, Justice and Law that give symbolic meaning to our social life.

References

  • Althusser, L. (1994). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). In S. Žižek (Ed.), Mapping ideology (1st ed. 1970, pp. 100–140). New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (2000). Freud e Lacan/Marx e Freud. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Graal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldino, R., & Cabral, T. (2006). Inclusion and diversity from Hegel-Lacan point of view: Do we desire our desire for change? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4,19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2005). Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pædagogik, 25(1), 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. J., & Forgasz, H. J. (2007). Issues in access and equity in mathematics education. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1145–1167). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boero, P. (2008). Autonomy and identity of mathematics education: Why and how to use external theories. To be published as part of the Proceedings of the 11 th International Congress on Mathematics Education. http://www.unige.ch/math/EnsMath/Rome2008/WG5/Papers/BOERO.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2010.

  • Cobb, P. (2007). Putting philosophy to work: Coping with multiple theoretical perspectives. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics and learning (pp. 3–38). New York: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, P., & Zevengergen, R. (2009). Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. (2008). Perspectives on representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 176–201). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (2007). (Re)Defining equity: The importance of a critical perspective. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 37–50). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (2008). A “gap-gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 37–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knijnik, G. (1993). An ethnomathematical approach in mathematical education: A matter of political power. For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(2), 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langrall, C., Mooney, E., Nisbet, S., & Jones, G. (2008). Elementary students’ access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 109–135). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. (2002). Research, reform and equity in U. S. Mathematics education. Mathematical and Learning, 4(2 & 3), 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. (2008). On “gap gazing” in mathematics education: The need for gap analyses. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 350–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1989). A contribution to the critique of political economy (1st ed. 1857). http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1859/critique-pol-economy/appx1.htm. Accessed 13 Jan 2010.

  • Nasir, N., & Cobb, P. (2007). Introduction. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 1–9). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M. (1996). Goals of mathematics teaching. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 11–47). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M. (2007). Reflections in the state and trends in research on mathematics teaching and learning: From here to utopia. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1293–1312). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A., Stentoft, D., & Valero, P. (2010). From questions of how to questions of why in mathematics education research. In U. Gellert, E. Jablonka, & C. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 369–378). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E., & Herbst, P. (2007). Theory in mathematics education scholarship. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics and learning (pp. 39–56). New York: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2008). Democratic access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Directions for the 21st century (2nd ed., pp. 415–438). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stentoft, D., & Valero, P. (2010). Fragile learning in mathematics classrooms: Exploring mathematics lessons within a pre-service course. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogies. New perspectives for mathematics (pp. 87–107). Charlotte, USA: IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valero, P. (2004a). Postmodernism as an attitude of critique to dominant mathematics education research. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 35–54). Greenwich: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valero, P. (2004b). Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 5–24). Boston: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Valero, P. (2007). A socio-political look at equity in the school organization of mathematics education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(3), 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valero, P. (2010). Mathematics education as a network of social practices. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. LIV-LXXX). Lyon: Institut National de Récherche Pédagogique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1991). For they know not what they do: Enjoyment as a political factor. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1994). The spectre of ideology. In S. Žižek (Ed.), Mapping ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2006). The parallax view. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2010). Denial: The liberal utopia. www.lacan.com. Accessed 20 Jan 2010.

Download references

Acknowledgment

This chapter is part of Alexandre Pais’ PhD study, supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal, grant SFRH/BD/38231/2007.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Pais .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pais, A., Valero, P. (2010). Beyond Disavowing the Politics of Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education. In: Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., Valero, P. (eds) Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics