Abstract
This paper discusses the problem of social exclusion, reported to be intrinsically connected to mathematical teaching from the perspective of Hegel's philosophy and Lacan's psychoanalysis. It provides a characterization of mathematics from a language viewpoint discusses the perennial demand for more mathematical achieving from the perspective of hysterics and obsessive symptoms and shows how desire is linked with the choice of values in assessment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldino, R.R. (1997). Student strategies in solidarity assimilation groups. In V. Zack, J. Mousdley & C. Breen (Eds.), Developing Practice: Teacher's Inquiry and Educational Change (pp. 123–134). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University. (20/06/1997).
Breen, C. (2000). Becoming more aware: Psychoanalytic insights concerning fear and relationship in the mathematics classroom. In T. Nakamara & M. Koyama (Eds.) Vol. 2, Proceedings of the 24th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 105–112). Hiroshima: Hiroshima University.
Breen, C. (2004). In the Serpent's Den: Contrasting scripts relating to fear of mathematics. In M.J. Hoines & A.B. Fuglestad (Eds.) Vol. 2, Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 167–174). Bergen: Bergen University College.
Brown, T. (1997). Mathematics Education and Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Brown, T., Hardy, T., & Wilson, D. (1993). Mathematics on Lacan's couch. For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(1), 11–14.
Cabral, T. (2004). Affect and cognition in pedagogical transference: A Lacanian perspective. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics Education Within the Postmodern (pp. 141–158). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age.
Cabral, T.C.B. & Baldino, R.R. (2002). Lacanian psychoanalysis and pedagogical transfer: Affect and cognition. In A.D. Cockburn, H. Nardi (Eds.), Vol. 2, Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 177–184). Norwich: University of East Anglia.
Cabral, T.C.B. & Baldino, R.R. (2004). Formal inclusion and real diversity in an engineering program of a new public university. In M.J. Hoines & A.B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Vol. 2, Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 175–182). Bergen: Bergen University College.
Coulanges, F. (1975). A Cidade Antiga. São Paulo: Hemus. Orig. La Cité Antique, 1864, Paris.
Dedekind, R. (1963). Theory of numbers. New York: Dover.
Dowling, P. (1998) The sociology of mathematics education. London: Falmer.
Ellerton, N.F. & Clarkson, P.C. (1996). Language factors in mathematics teaching and learning. In A. Bishop, et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 985–1033). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Evans, J. (2000). Adults' mathematical thinking and emotions: A study of numerate practices. London: Routledge Falmer.
Frankenstein, M. (1989). Relearning mathematics: A different third r-radical math(s). London: Free Association Books.
Gates, P. (2004). Lives, learning and liberty. The impact and responsibilities of mathematics education. In M.J. Hoines & A.B. Fuglestad, (Eds.), Vol. 1, Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 71–80). Bergen: Bergen University College.
Hardy, G.H. (1992). Divergent series. Chelsea Pub. Co.
Harré, R. (1995). But is it science? Traditional and alternative approaches to the study of social behaviour. World Psychology, 1(4), 47–78.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1970). Encyclopédie des Sciences Philosophiques. J. Vrin: Paris.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1998). Science of Logic. Humanity Books. Paperback edition. Translated by A.V. Miller. Originally published: London: Allen & Unwin, 1969.
Henrich, D. (1971). Hegel im Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Jaworski, B. (2004). Grappling with complexity: Co-learning in inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development. In M.J. Hoines & A.B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Vol. 1, Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 17–36). Bergen: Bergen University College.
Klette, K. (2004). Classroom business as usual? (What) do researchers and policy makers learn form classroom research? In M.J. Hoines, & A.B. Fuglestad (Eds.) Vol. 1, Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 3–16). Bergen: Bergen University College.
Knijnik, G. (2002). Two political facets of mathematics education in the production of social exclusion. In P. Valero & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Vol. 2, Proceedings of the Third International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 357–363). Copenhagen: Centre for Research in Learning Mathematics.
Lacan, J. (1966). Écrits. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Moses, R.P. & Cobb, C.E. Jr. (2001). Radical equations. Boston: Beacon.
Powell, A. (2004). The diversity backlash and the mathematical agency of students of color. In M.J. Hoines, & A.B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Vol. 1, Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 37–54). Bergen: Bergen University College.
Powell, A.B. & Frankenstein, M. (Eds.), Ethnomathematics: Challenging Eurocentrism in Mathematics Education. New York: State University of New York, 1997.
Restivo, S. (1992). Mathematics in society and history. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Skowsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critics mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Teixeira, M.V., Sad, L.A. & Baldino, R.R. (2001). Cauchy and the problem of point-wise convergence. Archives Internationales D'histoire des sciences, 51(147), 277–308.
Walshaw, M. (2004). The pedagogical relation in postmodern times: Learning with Lacan. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 121–139). USA: Information Age Publishing. ISBN 1-59311-130-4.
Willis, S. (1989). Real girls don't do maths. gender and the construction of privilege. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University.
Zaslavski, C. (1981). Mathematics education: The fraud of “Back to Basics” and the socialist counterexample. Science and Nature (4), 15–27.
Zizek, S. (1999). The Sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
Zizek, S. (2002). For they know not what they do. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baldino, R.R., Cabral, T.C.B. Inclusion and Diversity from Hegelylacan Point of View: Do We Desire Our Desire for Change?. Int J Sci Math Educ 4, 19–43 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9004-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9004-9