Abstract
This paper presents some theoretical tools to help understand the meaning of mathematics education as socio-political practices and the implications of these for researching mathematics education. Taking two cases of schools and students in Denmark and South Africa, the paper illustrates how the theoretical and methodological ideas come into operation when illuminating issues of equity. It is contended that the disadvantaged positioning of some students for participating in mathematics teaching and learning is the result of the routines, ideas, shared meanings, and ways of talking and conceiving mathematics education among the actors in the school organization, inside as well as outside the classroom.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Ole Skovsmose’s paper here in this number provides a good overview on this issue.
Such an approach shares many points in common with the recent work of Paul Cobb and collaborators (Cobb, McClain, Silva Lamberg, & Dean, 2003) on viewing mathematics teachers’ instructional practices as part of the school community of practice.
More details on the methodology and analysis of data in the empirical studies can be found in Valero (2002b).
The case of Gitte could be interpreted within the research on mathematics education for children with special needs. For a discussion of this trend see Magne (2001).
References
Adler J. (2001a). Resourcing practice and equity: A dual challenge for mathematics education. In: B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.) Sociocultural research on mathematics education. An international perspective (pp. 185–200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Adler, J. (2001b). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer.
Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics. Teaching styles, sex and setting. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Boaler, J. (1998). Nineties girls challenge eighties stereotypes: Updating gender perspectives. In: C. Keitel (Ed.) Social justice and mathematics education. Gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling (pp. 278–293). Berlin: IOWME—Freie Universität Berlin.
Burton, L. (Ed.). (2003). Which way social justice in mathematics education? Westport, CT: Praeger.
Cobb, P., McClain, K., Silva Lamberg, T. d., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational researcher: A publication of the American Educational Research Association, 32(6), 13–25.
De Freitas, E. (2004). Plotting intersections along the political axis: The interior voice of dissenting mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 259–274.
Fennema, E. (1995). Mathematics, gender and research. In B. Grevholm, & G. Hanna (Eds.) Gender and mathematics education (pp. 21–38). Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (1st American ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M., & Faubion, J. D. (2000). Power. New York: New Press; Distributed by W.W. Norton.
Ginsburg, H. (1997). The myth of the deprived child: New thoughts on poor children. In A. B. Powell, & M. Frankenstein (Eds.) Ethnomathematics: Challenging eurocentrism in mathematics education (pp. 129–154). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hardy, T. (2004). “There’s no hiding place”. Foucault’s notion of normalization at work in a mathematics lesson. In: M. Walshaw (Ed.) Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 103–119). Greenwich, USA: Information Age.
Keitel, C. (2006). Mathematics, knowledge and political power. In: J. Maasz, & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.) New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 11–22). Rotterdam: Sense.
Keitel, C. (Ed.). (1998). Social justice and mathematics education. Gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling. Berlin: IOWME—Freie Universität Berlin.
Leder, G., & Forgasz, H. (1998). Single-sex groupings for mathematics: An equitable solution? In: C. Keitel (Ed.) Social justice and mathematics education. Gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling (pp. 162–179). Berlin: IOWME—Freie Universität Berlin.
Lerman, S. (2006). Cultural psychology, anthropology and sociology: The developing ‘strong’ social turn. In: J. Maasz, & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.) New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 171–188). Rotterdam: Sense.
Licón-Khisty, L., & Chval, K. (2002). Pedagogic disocurse and equity in mathematics: When teachers’ talk matters. Mathematics Education Research Journal. Special issue: Equity and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 154–168.
Magne, O. (2001). Literature on special educational needs in mathematics. A bibliography with some comments. Malmö, Sweden: Department of Educational and Psychological Research—Malmö University.
Meaney, T. (2004). So what’s power got to do with it? In: M. Walshaw (Ed.) Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 181–200). Greenwich, USA: Information Age.
Perry, P., Valero, P., Castro, M., Gómez, P., & Agudelo, C. (1998). Calidad de la educación matemática en secundaria. Actores y procesos en la institución educativa. Bogotá: Una empresa docente.
Perry, P., Valero, P., & Gómez, P. (1996). La problemática de las matemáticas escolares desde una perspectiva institucional. In: P. Gómez (Ed.) La problemátca de las matemáticas escolares. Un reto para directivos y profesores. México: Una empresa docente y Grupo Editorial Iberoamérica.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2002). Whose heaven and whose redemption? The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum to save (please check one or all of the following: (a) the economy, (b) democracy, (c) the nation, (d) human rights, (d) the welfare state, (e) the individual). In P. Valero, & O. Skovsmose (Eds.) Proceedings of the third international conference on mathematics education and society (pp. 29–45). Copenhagen: Center for research in learning mathematics.
Rogers, P., & Kaiser, G. (1995). Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture. London, Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
Setati, K. (2005). Power and access in multilingual mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the Fourth Intenrational Conference on Matematics Education adn Society, Gold Coast, Australia.
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2001). Breaking political neutrality: The critical engagement of mathematics education with democracy. In: B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.) Sociocultural research on mathematics education. An international perspective (pp. 37–55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2002). Democratic access to powerful mathematical ideas. In: L. D. English (Ed.) Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Directions for the 21st century (pp. 383–407). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sriraman, B. (Ed.). (2007). The montana mathematics enthusiast. Monograph 1: International perspectives on social justice in mathematics education. Missoula, USA: Department of Mathematical Sciences—The University of Montana.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–467). Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE Publications.
Undervisningsministeriet. (1995). Matematik. Faghæfte 12: Undervisningsministeriet.
Valero, P. (2002a). The myth of the active learner: From cognitive to socio-political interpretations of students in mathematics classrooms. In P. Valero, & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on mathematics education and society (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 489–500). Copenhagen: Center for research in learning mathematics.
Valero, P. (2002b). Reform, democracy and matahematics education. Towards a socio-political frame for understanding change in the organization of secondary school mathematics. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Danish University of Education, Copenhagen.
Valero, P. (2004). Postmodernism as an attitude of critique to dominant mathematics education research. In: M. Walshaw (Ed.) Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 35–54). Greenwich, USA: Information Age.
Valero, P. (2007). In between the global and the local: The politics of mathematics education reform in a globalized society. In: B. Atweh, A. Calabrese Barton, M. Borba, N. Gough, C. Keitel, C. Vistro-Yu, & R. Vithal (Eds.) Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 421–439). New York: Springer.
Vithal, R. (2003). In search of a pedagogy of conflict and dialogue for mathematics education. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer.
Zevenbergen, R., & Flavel, S. (2007). Undertaking an archaeological dig in search of pedagogical relay. In: B. Sriraman (Ed.) The montana mathematics enthusiast. Monograph 1: International perspectives on social justice in mathematics education (pp. 63–74). Missoula, USA: Department of Mathematical Sciences—The University of Montana.
Zevenbergen, R., & Ortiz-Franco, L. (Eds.). (2002). Mathematics education research journal. Special issue: Equity and mathematics education (Vol. 14(2)). Melbourne: MERGA.
Acknowledgments
This paper makes part of the project “Mathematics Education and Democracy” which Ole Skovsmose and I are engaged with, at the Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valero, P. A socio-political look at equity in the school organization of mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education 39, 225–233 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0027-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0027-2